Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 May;38(5):485-499. doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00956-4. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
AIMS: To investigate the association between circulating lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population and in patients with chronic diseases, and to elucidate the dose-response relations. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched literature to find prospective studies reporting adjusted risk estimates on the association of Lp(a) and mortality outcomes. Forty-three publications, reporting on 75 studies (957,253 participants), were included. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI ) for the top versus bottom tertile of Lp(a) levels and risk of all-cause mortality were 1.09 (95%CI: 1.01-1.18, I: 75.34%, n = 19) in the general population and 1.18 (95%CI: 1.04-1.34, I: 52.5%, n = 12) in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The HRs for CVD mortality were 1.33 (95%CI: 1.11-1.58, I: 82.8%, n = 31) in the general population, 1.25 (95%CI: 1.10-1.43, I: 54.3%, n = 17) in patients with CVD and 2.53 (95%CI: 1.13-5.64, I: 66%, n = 4) in patients with diabetes mellitus. Linear dose-response analyses revealed that each 50 mg/dL increase in Lp(a) levels was associated with 31% and 15% greater risk of CVD death in the general population and in patients with CVD. No non-linear dose-response association was observed between Lp(a) levels and risk of all-cause or CVD mortality in the general population or in patients with CVD (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence that higher Lp(a) levels are associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality and CVD-death in the general population and in patients with CVD. These findings support the ESC/EAS Guidelines that recommend Lp(a) should be measured at least once in each adult person's lifetime, since our study suggests those with higher Lp(a) might also have higher risk of mortality.
目的:研究循环脂蛋白 (a) (Lp(a)) 与普通人群和慢性病患者全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率的相关性,并阐明剂量反应关系。
方法和结果:我们检索文献以寻找报告 Lp(a)与死亡率结果相关性的前瞻性研究。共纳入 43 篇文献,报道了 75 项研究(957253 名参与者)。Lp(a)水平最高与最低三分位组之间的风险比 (HR) 和 95%置信区间 (95%CI) 为全因死亡率分别为 1.09(95%CI:1.01-1.18,I:75.34%,n=19)和 1.18(95%CI:1.04-1.34,I:52.5%,n=12)在心血管疾病(CVD)患者中。普通人群中 CVD 死亡率的 HR 为 1.33(95%CI:1.11-1.58,I:82.8%,n=31),CVD 患者为 1.25(95%CI:1.10-1.43,I:54.3%,n=17),糖尿病患者为 2.53(95%CI:1.13-5.64,I:66%,n=4)。线性剂量反应分析表明,Lp(a)水平每增加 50mg/dL,普通人群和 CVD 患者的 CVD 死亡风险分别增加 31%和 15%。在普通人群或 CVD 患者中,未观察到 Lp(a)水平与全因或 CVD 死亡率之间存在非线性剂量反应关系(P>0.05)。
结论:本研究进一步证明,较高的 Lp(a)水平与普通人群和 CVD 患者的全因死亡率和 CVD 死亡风险增加相关。这些发现支持 ESC/EAS 指南,建议在每个成年人的一生中至少测量一次 Lp(a),因为我们的研究表明,Lp(a)较高的人可能也有更高的死亡风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-8-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-11-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-6-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-7-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025-7-22
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025-6-1
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025-5-27
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025-3-24
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024-11-6
Eur J Intern Med. 2021-9
J Diabetes Complications. 2020-7