• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为澳大利亚原住民开发和评估“本土生育”服务:基于优势的生育力增强(BOOST)前瞻性混合方法生育队列研究方案。

Developing and evaluating Birthing on Country services for First Nations Australians: the Building On Our Strengths (BOOSt) prospective mixed methods birth cohort study protocol.

机构信息

Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, Charles Darwin University, Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.

Waminda South Coast Women's Health & Wellbeing Aboriginal Corporation, Kinghorne Street, Nowra, NSW, 2541, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05277-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-05277-8
PMID:36709265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9883816/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the impact of over two centuries of colonisation in Australia, First Nations families experience a disproportionate burden of adverse pregnancy and birthing outcomes. First Nations mothers are 3-5 times more likely than other mothers to experience maternal mortality; babies are 2-3 times more likely to be born preterm, low birth weight or not to survive their first year. 'Birthing on Country' incorporates a multiplicity of interpretations but conveys a resumption of maternity services in First Nations Communities with Community governance for the best start to life. Redesigned services offer women and families integrated, holistic care, including carer continuity from primary through tertiary services; services coordination and quality care including safe and supportive spaces. The overall aim of Building On Our Strengths (BOOSt) is to facilitate and assess Birthing on Country expansion into two settings - urban and rural; with scale-up to include First Nations-operated birth centres. This study will build on our team's earlier work - a Birthing on Country service established and evaluated in an urban setting, that reported significant perinatal (and organisational) benefits, including a 37% reduction in preterm births, among other improvements.

METHODS

Using community-based, participatory action research, we will collaborate to develop, implement and evaluate new Birthing on Country care models. We will conduct a mixed-methods, prospective birth cohort study in two settings, comparing outcomes for women having First Nations babies with historical controls. Our analysis of feasibility, acceptability, clinical and cultural safety, effectiveness and cost, will use data including (i) women's experiences collected through longitudinal surveys (three timepoints) and yarning interviews; (ii) clinical records; (iii) staff and stakeholder views and experiences; (iv) field notes and meeting minutes; and (v) costs data. The study includes a process, impact and outcome evaluation of this complex health services innovation.

DISCUSSION

Birthing on Country applies First Nations governance and cultural safety strategies to support optimum maternal, infant, and family health and wellbeing. Women's experiences, perinatal outcomes, costs and other operational implications will be reported for Communities, service providers, policy advisors, and for future scale-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia & New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry # ACTRN12620000874910 (2 September 2020).

摘要

背景

在澳大利亚两百多年殖民影响下,原住民家庭承受着不成比例的不良妊娠和分娩结果的负担。原住民母亲死于妊娠或分娩相关并发症的风险比其他母亲高 3-5 倍;婴儿早产、低体重或无法存活到一岁的风险比其他母亲高 2-3 倍。“在本土生育”有多种解释,但都传达了在原住民社区恢复以社区为基础的母性服务,以实现最佳的生命开端。重新设计的服务为女性及其家庭提供了综合的、整体的护理,包括从初级到三级服务的护理连续性;服务协调和高质量护理,包括安全和支持性空间。“强化优势(BOOST)”的总体目标是促进和评估“在本土生育”扩展到两个环境——城市和农村;扩大规模包括原住民运营的生育中心。这项研究将建立在我们团队早期的工作基础上,即在城市环境中建立和评估“在本土生育”服务,该服务报告了显著的围产期(和组织)效益,包括早产率降低 37%,以及其他改善。

方法

使用基于社区的参与式行动研究,我们将合作开发、实施和评估新的“在本土生育”护理模式。我们将在两个环境中进行一项混合方法、前瞻性的出生队列研究,将有原住民婴儿的女性与历史对照进行比较。我们对可行性、可接受性、临床和文化安全性、有效性和成本的分析将使用包括以下内容的数据:(i)通过纵向调查(三个时间点)和交谈访谈收集的女性体验;(ii)临床记录;(iii)员工和利益相关者的观点和经验;(iv)现场笔记和会议记录;(v)成本数据。该研究包括对这种复杂的卫生服务创新进行过程、影响和结果评估。

讨论

“在本土生育”应用原住民治理和文化安全策略,以支持产妇、婴儿和家庭的最佳健康和福祉。社区、服务提供者、政策顾问以及未来的扩大规模将报告女性的体验、围产期结果、成本和其他运营影响。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心 #ACTRN12620000874910(2020 年 9 月 2 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/651a/9883943/b636878e004a/12884_2022_5277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/651a/9883943/b636878e004a/12884_2022_5277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/651a/9883943/b636878e004a/12884_2022_5277_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and evaluating Birthing on Country services for First Nations Australians: the Building On Our Strengths (BOOSt) prospective mixed methods birth cohort study protocol.为澳大利亚原住民开发和评估“本土生育”服务:基于优势的生育力增强(BOOST)前瞻性混合方法生育队列研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05277-8.
2
The Indigenous Birthing in an Urban Setting study: the IBUS study : A prospective birth cohort study comparing different models of care for women having Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander babies at two major maternity hospitals in urban South East Queensland, Australia.原住民城市生育研究:IBUS 研究:一项前瞻性出生队列研究,比较了澳大利亚东南部两个主要妇产医院中,不同模式的护理对原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民婴儿的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 1;18(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2067-8.
3
Implementing Birthing on Country services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families: RISE Framework.实施原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民家庭的“本土生育服务”:RISE 框架。
Women Birth. 2019 Oct;32(5):466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
4
Enabling the context for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Birthing on Country services: Participatory action research.促进原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区控制生育服务的落地:参与式行动研究。
Women Birth. 2024 Mar;37(2):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.11.007. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
5
Effect of a Birthing on Country service redesign on maternal and neonatal health outcomes for First Nations Australians: a prospective, non-randomised, interventional trial.原住民产妇分娩服务模式改革对母婴健康结局的影响:一项前瞻性、非随机、干预性试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e651-e659. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00061-9. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
'Closing the Gap': how maternity services can contribute to reducing poor maternal infant health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women.“缩小差距”:产科服务如何助力降低原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民妇女不良母婴健康结局的发生率
Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jul-Sep;10(3):1383. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
7
Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care models of service delivery: a scoping review protocol.本土初级卫生保健服务提供模式的特点:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):43-51. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2474.
8
Self-determination in programmes of perinatal health for Aboriginal Communities: A systematic review.原住民社区围产期保健计划中的自决:系统评价。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2024 Aug;48(4):100169. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100169. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
9
Evaluation of an Australian Aboriginal model of maternity care: The Malabar Community Midwifery Link Service.评价澳大利亚原住民模式的产妇护理:马拉巴尔社区助产士联系服务。
Women Birth. 2019 Oct;32(5):427-436. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
10
"It's research, our input can grow": identifying health research priorities with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities-study protocol.“这是研究,我们的投入能够增加”:与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区共同确定健康研究重点——研究方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 28;9(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00467-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of a Birthing on Country service redesign on maternal and neonatal health outcomes for First Nations Australians: a prospective, non-randomised, interventional trial.原住民产妇分娩服务模式改革对母婴健康结局的影响:一项前瞻性、非随机、干预性试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e651-e659. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00061-9. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Caring for Mum On Country: Exploring the transferability of the Birthing On Country RISE framework in a remote multilingual Northern Australian context.在原住民土地上照顾妈妈:在澳大利亚北部偏远的多语言环境中探索生育在原住民土地上 RISE 框架的可转移性。
Women Birth. 2021 Sep;34(5):487-492. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
3
Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool.
从原住民视角评估卫生研究质量:原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民质量评估工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00959-3.
4
Reducing preterm birth amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander babies: A prospective cohort study, Brisbane, Australia.降低澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民婴儿的早产率:一项前瞻性队列研究,澳大利亚布里斯班
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jun 24;12:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.06.001. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
"Our culture, how it is to be us" - Listening to Aboriginal women about on Country urban birthing.“我们的文化,我们的本色”——倾听澳原住民女性讲述在故乡城市分娩的故事。
Women Birth. 2019 Oct;32(5):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
6
Implementing Birthing on Country services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families: RISE Framework.实施原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民家庭的“本土生育服务”:RISE 框架。
Women Birth. 2019 Oct;32(5):466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
7
The Indigenous Birthing in an Urban Setting study: the IBUS study : A prospective birth cohort study comparing different models of care for women having Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander babies at two major maternity hospitals in urban South East Queensland, Australia.原住民城市生育研究:IBUS 研究:一项前瞻性出生队列研究,比较了澳大利亚东南部两个主要妇产医院中,不同模式的护理对原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民婴儿的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 1;18(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2067-8.
8
Care Coordinators in Integrated Care: Burnout Risk, Perceived Supports, and Job Satisfaction.整合照护中的照护协调员:倦怠风险、感知支持和工作满意度。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jun;54(6 Suppl 3):S250-S257. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.044.
9
Yarning quiet ways: Aboriginal carers' views on talking to youth about sexuality and relationships.安静的方式:原住民照顾者对与青少年谈论性与关系的看法。
Health Promot J Austr. 2018 Apr;29(1):39-45. doi: 10.1002/hpja.14. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
10
"I just feel comfortable out here, there's something about the place": staff and client perceptions of a remote Australian Aboriginal drug and alcohol rehabilitation service.“我只是在这里感到舒服,这里有一些特别的地方”:员工和客户对澳大利亚偏远地区的土著药物和酒精康复服务的看法。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 Dec 6;12(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0135-0.