Suppr超能文献

认知老化伴痴呆、轻度认知障碍或无认知障碍:同性别和混合性别夫妇的比较。

Cognitive Aging with Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, or No Impairment: A Comparison of Same- and Mixed-Sex Couples.

机构信息

Mental Health Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;92(1):109-128. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220309.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lesbian and gay older adults have health disparities that are risk factors for Alzheimer's disease, yet little is known about the neurocognitive aging of sexual minority groups.

OBJECTIVE

To explore cross-sectional and longitudinal dementia outcomes for adults in same-sex relationships (SSR) and those in mixed-sex relationships (MSR).

METHODS

This prospective observational study utilized data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACC UDS) collected from contributing Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers. Participants were adults aged 55+ years at baseline with at least two visits in NACC UDS (from September 2005 to March 2021) who had a spouse, partner, or companion as a co-participant. Outcome measures included CDR® Dementia Staging Instrument, NACC UDS neuropsychological testing, and the Functional Activities Questionnaire. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models accounted for center clustering and repeated measures by individual.

RESULTS

Both MSR and SSR groups experienced cognitive decline regardless of baseline diagnosis. In general, MSR and SSR groups did not differ statistically on cross-sectional or longitudinal estimates of functioning, dementia severity, or neuropsychological testing, with two primary exceptions. People in SSR with mild cognitive impairment showed less functional impairment at baseline (FAQ M = 2.61, SD = 3.18 vs. M = 3.97, SD = 4.53, respectively; p < 0.01). The SSR group with dementia had less steep decline in attention/working memory (β estimates = -0.10 versus -0.18; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Participants in SSR did not show cognitive health disparities consistent with a minority stress model. Additional research into protective factors is warranted.

摘要

背景

女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋老年群体存在健康差距,这些差距是导致阿尔茨海默病的风险因素,但人们对性少数群体的神经认知老化知之甚少。

目的

探讨处于同性关系(SSR)和异性关系(MSR)中的成年人的横断面和纵向痴呆结局。

方法

本前瞻性观察性研究利用了来自参与阿尔茨海默病研究中心的国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心统一数据集中(NACC UDS)的数据。参与者为基线时年龄在 55 岁及以上、在 NACC UDS 中有至少两次就诊(2005 年 9 月至 2021 年 3 月)、有配偶、伴侣或同伴作为共同参与者的成年人。结果测量包括 CDR®痴呆分期工具、NACC UDS 神经心理学测试和功能活动问卷。多变量线性混合效应模型考虑了中心聚类和个体的重复测量。

结果

MSR 和 SSR 组无论基线诊断如何,都经历了认知能力下降。一般来说,MSR 和 SSR 组在横断面或纵向的功能、痴呆严重程度或神经心理学测试方面没有统计学差异,只有两个主要例外。轻度认知障碍的 SSR 组在基线时功能障碍程度较低(FAQ M=2.61,SD=3.18 与 M=3.97,SD=4.53;p<0.01)。痴呆的 SSR 组注意力/工作记忆的下降速度较慢(β估计值分别为-0.10 和-0.18;p<0.01)。

结论

SSR 组的参与者没有表现出与少数群体应激模型一致的认知健康差距。需要进一步研究保护因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验