Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan.
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Apr 19;11:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-65.
The aims of this study were to determine the time course of improvements in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) clinical symptoms and neurocognitive function in a realistic clinical setting, and the differences in ADHD symptom improvement using different classifications of ADHD subtypes.
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) was completed by parents of ADHD children at the initial visit. The computerized Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, and Version IV Scale for ADHD (SNAP-IV), and ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) were performed at baseline, one month, three months, and six months later, respectively. Patient care including drug therapy was performed at the discretion of the psychiatrist. The ADHD patients were divided into DSM-IV subtypes (Inattentive, Hyperactive-impulsive and Combined type), and were additionally categorized into aggressive and non-aggressive subtypes by aggression scale in CBCL for comparisons.
There were 50 ADHD patients with a mean age of 7.84 ± 1.64 years; 15 of them were inattentive type, 11 were hyperactive-impulsive type, and 24 were combined type. In addition, 28 of the ADHD patients were grouped into aggressive and 22 into non-aggressive subtypes. There were significant improvements in clinical symptoms of hyperactivity and inattention, and impulsivity performance in CPT during the 6-month treatment. The clinical hyperactive symptoms were significantly different between ADHD patients sub-grouping both by DSM-IV and aggression. Non-aggressive patients had significantly greater changes in distraction and impulsivity performances in CPT from baseline to month 6 than aggressive patients.
We found that ADHD symptoms, which included impulsive performances in CPT and clinical inattention and hyperactivity dimensions, had improved significantly over 6 months under pragmatic treatments. The non-aggressive ADHD patients might have a higher potential for improving in CPT performance than aggressive ones. However, it warrant further investigation whether the different classifications of ADHD patients could be valid for predicting the improvements in ADHD patients' clinical symptoms and neurocognitive performance.
本研究旨在确定在现实临床环境中注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)临床症状和神经认知功能的改善时间进程,以及使用不同 ADHD 亚型分类方法改善 ADHD 症状的差异。
ADHD 患儿的父母在初诊时填写儿童行为检查表(CBCL)。基线时、1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月后分别进行计算机连续执行测试(CPT)、斯旺森、诺兰和佩勒姆第四版量表(SNAP-IV)和 ADHD 评定量表(ADHD-RS)。患者的治疗(包括药物治疗)由精神科医生决定。将 ADHD 患者分为 DSM-IV 亚型(注意力不集中型、多动冲动型和混合型),并根据 CBCL 中的攻击量表将其进一步分为攻击型和非攻击型亚型进行比较。
共纳入 50 例 ADHD 患儿,平均年龄为 7.84±1.64 岁;15 例为注意力不集中型,11 例为多动冲动型,24 例为混合型。此外,28 例 ADHD 患者分为攻击型,22 例分为非攻击型。6 个月治疗期间,患儿的多动和注意力不集中症状及 CPT 冲动性表现均有显著改善。根据 DSM-IV 和攻击行为对 ADHD 患者进行分组后,临床多动症状存在显著差异。与攻击型患儿相比,非攻击型患儿在 CPT 中的分心和冲动性表现从基线到第 6 个月的变化更为显著。
我们发现,在实用治疗下,ADHD 症状(包括 CPT 中的冲动表现以及临床注意力不集中和多动维度)在 6 个月内显著改善。非攻击型 ADHD 患者在 CPT 表现上可能有更高的改善潜力。然而,不同 ADHD 患者分类是否能有效预测 ADHD 患者临床症状和神经认知表现的改善仍需进一步研究。