• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习预测心力衰竭患者的院内全因死亡率。

Predicting in-hospital all-cause mortality in heart failure using machine learning.

作者信息

Mpanya Dineo, Celik Turgay, Klug Eric, Ntsinjana Hopewell

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Wits Institute of Data Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 11;9:1032524. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1032524. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1032524
PMID:36712268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9875063/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The age of onset and causes of heart failure differ between high-income and low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC). Heart failure patients in LMIC also experience a higher mortality rate. Innovative ways that can risk stratify heart failure patients in this region are needed. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of machine learning in predicting all-cause mortality in heart failure patients hospitalised in a tertiary academic centre.

METHODS

Six supervised machine learning algorithms were trained to predict in-hospital all-cause mortality using data from 500 consecutive heart failure patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 50%.

RESULTS

The mean age was 55.2 ± 16.8 years. There were 271 (54.2%) males, and the mean LVEF was 29 ± 9.2%. The median duration of hospitalisation was 7 days (interquartile range: 4-11), and it did not differ between patients discharged alive and those who died. After a prediction window of 4 years (interquartile range: 2-6), 84 (16.8%) patients died before discharge from the hospital. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82, 0.78, 0.77, 0.76, 0.75, and 0.62 for random forest, logistic regression, support vector machines (SVM), extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and decision trees, and the accuracy during the test phase was 88, 87, 86, 82, 78, and 76% for random forest, MLP, SVM, extreme gradient boosting, decision trees, and logistic regression. The support vector machines were the best performing algorithm, and furosemide, beta-blockers, spironolactone, early diastolic murmur, and a parasternal heave had a positive coefficient with the target feature, whereas coronary artery disease, potassium, oedema grade, ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and right bundle branch block on electrocardiogram had negative coefficients.

CONCLUSION

Despite a small sample size, supervised machine learning algorithms successfully predicted all-cause mortality with modest accuracy. The SVM model will be externally validated using data from multiple cardiology centres in South Africa before developing a uniquely African risk prediction tool that can potentially transform heart failure management through precision medicine.

摘要

背景

高收入国家与低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)心力衰竭的发病年龄和病因有所不同。LMIC的心力衰竭患者死亡率也更高。需要有创新方法对该地区的心力衰竭患者进行风险分层。本研究的目的是证明机器学习在预测三级学术中心住院的心力衰竭患者全因死亡率方面的效用。

方法

使用来自500例连续的左心室射血分数(LVEF)低于50%的心力衰竭患者的数据,训练六种监督式机器学习算法来预测院内全因死亡率。

结果

平均年龄为55.2±16.8岁。男性有271例(54.2%),平均LVEF为29±9.2%。中位住院时间为7天(四分位间距:4 - 11天),存活出院患者与死亡患者之间无差异。在4年的预测窗口(四分位间距:2 - 6年)后,84例(16.8%)患者在出院前死亡。随机森林、逻辑回归、支持向量机(SVM)、极端梯度提升、多层感知器(MLP)和决策树的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.82、0.78、0.77、0.76、0.75和0.62,测试阶段随机森林、MLP、SVM、极端梯度提升、决策树和逻辑回归的准确率分别为88%、87%、86%、82%、78%和76%。支持向量机是表现最佳的算法,呋塞米、β受体阻滞剂、螺内酯、舒张早期杂音和胸骨旁抬举与目标特征呈正系数,而冠状动脉疾病、血钾、水肿分级、缺血性心肌病和心电图右束支传导阻滞呈负系数。

结论

尽管样本量较小,但监督式机器学习算法成功地以适度的准确率预测了全因死亡率。在开发一种独特的非洲风险预测工具之前,SVM模型将使用来自南非多个心脏病中心的数据进行外部验证,该工具可能通过精准医学改变心力衰竭的管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/7b073c369068/fcvm-09-1032524-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/b7ab4a8e448c/fcvm-09-1032524-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/c8274f1fdbb4/fcvm-09-1032524-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/b16750d38f3f/fcvm-09-1032524-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/3dba8447ab09/fcvm-09-1032524-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/7b073c369068/fcvm-09-1032524-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/b7ab4a8e448c/fcvm-09-1032524-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/c8274f1fdbb4/fcvm-09-1032524-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/b16750d38f3f/fcvm-09-1032524-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/3dba8447ab09/fcvm-09-1032524-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65ae/9875063/7b073c369068/fcvm-09-1032524-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting in-hospital all-cause mortality in heart failure using machine learning.使用机器学习预测心力衰竭患者的院内全因死亡率。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 11;9:1032524. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1032524. eCollection 2022.
2
Machine Learning for Mortality Prediction in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.机器学习在射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭患者死亡率预测中的应用。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;12(12):e029124. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029124. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
3
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
4
The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.应用机器学习模型预测伴有冠状动脉疾病的慢性肾脏病患者的院内死亡率。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jan 18;28(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-00995-x.
5
Predicting mortality and hospitalization in heart failure using machine learning: A systematic literature review.使用机器学习预测心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率:一项系统文献综述。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Apr 12;34:100773. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100773. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree.使用梯度提升决策树预测重症监护病房脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025813.
7
Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics.基于机器学习的心力衰竭再入院或死亡预测:选择正确模型和指标的意义。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):428-435. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12419. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.使用数据挖掘方法进行精液质量预测。
Technol Health Care. 2014;22(4):531-45. doi: 10.3233/THC-140816.
9
Machine learning-based in-hospital mortality prediction models for patients with acute coronary syndrome.基于机器学习的急性冠状动脉综合征患者院内死亡率预测模型。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.070. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Comparison of Approaches for Prediction of Renal Replacement Therapy-Free Survival in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.急性肾损伤患者无肾脏替代治疗生存期预测方法的比较
Blood Purif. 2021;50(4-5):621-627. doi: 10.1159/000513700. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of artificial intelligence in healthcare in South Africa: A scoping review.人工智能在南非医疗保健中的应用:一项范围综述。
Health SA. 2025 Jul 14;30:2977. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2977. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of artificial intelligence and digital technology-based diagnostic tools for communicable and non-communicable diseases in Africa.人工智能和基于数字技术的诊断工具对非洲传染病和非传染病的影响。
Afr J Lab Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(1):2516. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2516. eCollection 2024.
3
Using Machine Learning to Improve Readmission Risk in Surgical Patients in South Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Profiles and Outcomes of Heart Failure in Five African Countries: Results from INTER-CHF Study.五个非洲国家心力衰竭的临床特征和结局:INTER-CHF 研究结果。
Glob Heart. 2021 Jul 30;16(1):50. doi: 10.5334/gh.940. eCollection 2021.
2
Machine learning can predict survival of patients with heart failure from serum creatinine and ejection fraction alone.机器学习仅通过血清肌酐和射血分数即可预测心力衰竭患者的生存情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1023-5.
3
Improving risk prediction in heart failure using machine learning.
利用机器学习改善南非外科手术患者的再入院风险
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;22(3):345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030345.
4
Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.用于预测心力衰竭死亡率和再入院的机器学习方法评估:荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04700-0.
5
The application of machine learning models in a resource-constrained environment.机器学习模型在资源受限环境中的应用。
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03951-2.
6
An explainable multi-objective hybrid machine learning model for reducing heart failure mortality.一种用于降低心力衰竭死亡率的可解释多目标混合机器学习模型。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Feb 25;11:e2682. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2682. eCollection 2025.
7
Integrating EPSOSA-BP neural network algorithm for enhanced accuracy and robustness in optimizing coronary artery disease prediction.集成EPSOSA-BP神经网络算法以提高优化冠状动脉疾病预测的准确性和鲁棒性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):30993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82184-2.
8
Predictive Value of Machine Learning for the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习对心力衰竭患者院内死亡风险的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jan;48(1):e70071. doi: 10.1002/clc.70071.
9
Machine learning models for predicting risks of MACEs for myocardial infarction patients with different VEGFR2 genotypes.用于预测不同VEGFR2基因型心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心血管事件风险的机器学习模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 5;11:1452239. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1452239. eCollection 2024.
10
Machine learning in heart failure diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis: review.机器学习在心力衰竭诊断、预测及预后中的应用:综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 May 6;86(6):3615-3623. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002138. eCollection 2024 Jun.
利用机器学习改善心力衰竭的风险预测。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;22(1):139-147. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1628. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
4
Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.机器学习预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Sample-Size Determination Methodologies for Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Research: A Systematic Review.机器学习在医学影像学研究中的样本量确定方法:系统评价。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019 Nov;70(4):344-353. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
6
Mortality and Readmission Following Hospitalisation for Heart Failure in Australia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.澳大利亚心力衰竭住院后的死亡率和再入院率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Aug;27(8):917-927. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
7
Clinical characteristics and causes of heart failure, adherence to treatment guidelines, and mortality of patients with acute heart failure: Experience at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.急性心力衰竭患者的临床特征、病因、对治疗指南的依从性及死亡率:南非开普敦古特·舒尔医院的经验
S Afr Med J. 2018 Feb 1;108(2):94-98. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v108i2.12519.
8
Heart failure care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家的心力衰竭护理:系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS Med. 2014 Aug 12;11(8):e1001699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001699. eCollection 2014 Aug.
9
How large a training set is needed to develop a classifier for microarray data?开发一个用于微阵列数据的分类器需要多大的训练集?
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jan 1;14(1):108-14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0443.