Winther Simon, Nissen Louise, Schmidt Samuel Emil, Westra Jelmer, Andersen Ina Trolle, Nyegaard Mette, Madsen Lene Helleskov, Knudsen Lars Lyhne, Urbonaviciene Grazina, Larsen Bjarke Skogstad, Struijk Johannes Jan, Frost Lars, Holm Niels Ramsing, Christiansen Evald Høj, Bøtker Hans Erik, Bøttcher Morten
Department of Cardiology, Gødstrup Hospital, Hospitalsparken 15, 7400 Herning, Denmark.
Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021 Mar 19;2(2):279-289. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab031. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Recent technological advances enable diagnosing of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) from heart sound analysis with a high negative predictive value. However, the prognostic impact of this approach remains unknown. To investigate the prognostic value of heart sound analysis as two scores, the Acoustic-score and the CAD-score, in patients with suspected CAD which is treated according to standard of care.
Consecutive patients with angina symptoms referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) were enrolled. The Acoustic-score was developed from eight acoustic CAD-related features. This score was combined with risk factors to generate the CAD-score. A cut-off score >20 was pre-specified for both scores to indicate disease. If coronary CTA raised suspicion of obstructive CAD, patients were referred to invasive angiography and revascularized when indicated. Of 1675 enrolled patients, 1464 (87.4%) were included in this substudy. The combined primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction ( = 26). Follow-up was 3.1 (2.7-3.4) years. Of patients with primary endpoints, the Acoustic-score was >20 in 25 (96%); the CAD-score was >20 in 22 (85%). In an unadjusted Cox analysis of the primary endpoints, the hazard ratio for scores >20 under current standard clinical care was 12.6 (1.7-93.2) for the Acoustic-score and 5.4 (1.9-15.7) for the CAD-score. The CAD-score contained prognostic information even after adjusting for lipid-lowering therapy initiation, stenosis at CTA, and early revascularization.
Heart sound analysis seems to carry prognostic information and may improve initial risk stratification of patients with suspected CAD.
NCT02264717.
近期的技术进步使得通过心音分析诊断阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)具有较高的阴性预测价值。然而,这种方法对预后的影响尚不清楚。为了研究心音分析作为两种评分,即声学评分和CAD评分,在按照标准治疗的疑似CAD患者中的预后价值。
纳入因心绞痛症状而接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)的连续患者。声学评分由八个与CAD相关的声学特征得出。该评分与危险因素相结合以生成CAD评分。预先设定两个评分均>20为疾病阳性。如果冠状动脉CTA引发对阻塞性CAD的怀疑,患者将接受有创血管造影,并在指征明确时进行血运重建。在1675名纳入患者中,1464名(87.4%)被纳入该亚研究。联合主要终点是全因死亡率和心肌梗死(n = 26)。随访时间为3.1(2.7 - 3.4)年。在有主要终点的患者中,声学评分>20的有25名(96%);CAD评分>20的有22名(85%)。在对主要终点进行的未调整Cox分析中,在当前标准临床治疗下,声学评分>20的风险比为12.6(1.7 - 93.2),CAD评分为5.4(1.9 - 15.7)。即使在调整了降脂治疗开始、CTA狭窄和早期血运重建后,CAD评分仍包含预后信息。
心音分析似乎携带预后信息,可能改善疑似CAD患者的初始风险分层。
NCT02264717。