Ye Jing, Mu Yi-Yang, Wang Jiong, He Xiao-Feng
The First People's Hospital of Bijie, Bijie, Guizhou, China.
Orthopedics, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, China.
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 12;13:1074570. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1074570. eCollection 2022.
Studies have shown that glutathione S-transferase M1 () and. glutathione S-transferase T1 null genotype may increase the risk of cervical cancer (CC) or ovarian cancer (OC), however, the results of published original studies and meta-analyses are inconsistent. To investigate the association between present/null and present/null polymorphisms, with the risk of cervical cancer or ovarian cancer. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association between present/null and present/null polymorphisms and the risk of cervical cancer or ovarian cancer. To assess the confidence of statistically significant associations, we applied false positive reporting probability (FPRP) and bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP) tests. Overall analysis showed that null was associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer, and subgroup analysis showed a significant increase in cervical cancer risk in Indian and Chinese populations; was not found null genotype are significantly associated with cervical cancer. Overall analysis showed that and null were not associated with the risk of ovarian cancer, subgroup analysis showed that null was associated with an increased risk of OC in East Asia, and null was associated with an increased risk of OC in South America. However, when we used false positive reporting probability and bayesian false discovery probability to verify the confidence of a significant association, all positive results showed "low confidence" (FPRP > .2, BFDP > .8). Overall, this study strongly suggests that all positive results should be interpreted with caution and are likely a result of missing plausibility rather than a true association.
研究表明,谷胱甘肽S-转移酶M1()和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶T1无效基因型可能会增加患宫颈癌(CC)或卵巢癌(OC)的风险,然而,已发表的原始研究和荟萃分析的结果并不一致。为了研究谷胱甘肽S-转移酶M1现有/无效和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶T1现有/无效多态性与宫颈癌或卵巢癌风险之间的关联。比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)用于评估谷胱甘肽S-转移酶M1现有/无效和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶T1现有/无效多态性与宫颈癌或卵巢癌风险之间的关联。为了评估具有统计学意义的关联的可信度,我们应用了假阳性报告概率(FPRP)和贝叶斯假发现概率(BFDP)检验。总体分析表明,谷胱甘肽S-转移酶M1无效与宫颈癌风险增加相关,亚组分析显示印度和中国人群中宫颈癌风险显著增加;未发现谷胱甘肽S-转移酶T1无效基因型与宫颈癌显著相关。总体分析表明,谷胱甘肽S-转移酶M1和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶T1无效与卵巢癌风险无关,亚组分析显示谷胱甘肽S-转移酶M1无效与东亚卵巢癌风险增加相关,谷胱甘肽S-转移酶T1无效与南美洲卵巢癌风险增加相关。然而,当我们使用假阳性报告概率和贝叶斯假发现概率来验证显著关联的可信度时,所有阳性结果均显示“低可信度”(FPRP>.2,BFDP>.8)。总体而言,本研究强烈表明,所有阳性结果都应谨慎解释,可能是缺乏合理性的结果,而非真正的关联。