• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习从基于人群到基于患者的心力衰竭住院死亡率预测

From population- to patient-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in heart failure using machine learning.

作者信息

König Sebastian, Pellissier Vincent, Hohenstein Sven, Leiner Johannes, Meier-Hellmann Andreas, Kuhlen Ralf, Hindricks Gerhard, Bollmann Andreas

机构信息

Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Electrophysiology, Strümpellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.

Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Mar 31;3(2):307-310. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac012. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztac012
PMID:36713020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9708014/
Abstract

AIMS

Utilizing administrative data may facilitate risk prediction in heart failure inpatients. In this short report, we present different machine learning models that predict in-hospital mortality on an individual basis utilizing this widely available data source.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Inpatient cases with a main discharge diagnosis of heart failure hospitalized between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018 in one of 86 German Helios hospitals were examined. Comorbidities were defined by ICD-10 codes from administrative data. The data set was randomly split into 75/25% portions for model development and testing. Five algorithms were evaluated: logistic regression [generalized linear models (GLMs)], random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), single-layer neural network (NNET), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). After model tuning, the receiver operating characteristics area under the curves (ROC AUCs) were calculated and compared with DeLong's test. A total of 59 074 inpatient cases (mean age 77.6 ± 11.1 years, 51.9% female, 89.4% NYHA Class III/IV) were included and in-hospital mortality was 6.2%. In the test data set, calculated ROC AUCs were 0.853 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.842-0.863] for GLM, 0.851 (95% CI 0.840-0.862) for RF, 0.855 (95% CI 0.844-0.865) for GBM, 0.836 (95% CI 0.823-0.849) for NNET, and 0.856 (95% CI 9.846-0.867) for XGBoost. XGBoost outperformed all models except GBM.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning-based processing of administrative data enables the creation of well-performing prediction models for in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients.

摘要

目的

利用管理数据可能有助于预测心力衰竭住院患者的风险。在本简短报告中,我们展示了不同的机器学习模型,这些模型利用这一广泛可用的数据源对个体的院内死亡率进行预测。

方法与结果

对2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间在德国86家赫利俄斯医院之一住院、主要出院诊断为心力衰竭的患者进行了研究。合并症由管理数据中的ICD - 10编码定义。数据集被随机分为75/25%用于模型开发和测试。评估了五种算法:逻辑回归[广义线性模型(GLMs)]、随机森林(RF)、梯度提升机(GBM)、单层神经网络(NNET)和极端梯度提升(XGBoost)。经过模型调整后,计算曲线下面积的受试者工作特征(ROC AUCs),并与德龙检验进行比较。共纳入59074例住院患者(平均年龄77.6±11.1岁,51.9%为女性,89.4%为纽约心脏协会III/IV级),院内死亡率为6.2%。在测试数据集中,GLM的计算ROC AUCs为0.853[95%置信区间(CI)0.842 - 0.863],RF为0.851(95% CI 0.840 - 0.862),GBM为0.855(95% CI 0.844 - 0.865),NNET为0.836(95% CI 0.823 - 0.849),XGBoost为0.856(95% CI 9.846 - 0.867)。除GBM外,XGBoost的表现优于所有模型。

结论

基于机器学习的管理数据处理能够为心力衰竭患者的院内死亡率创建性能良好的预测模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a58/9708014/e50c429f0fc4/ztac012ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a58/9708014/e50c429f0fc4/ztac012ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a58/9708014/e50c429f0fc4/ztac012ga1.jpg

相似文献

1
From population- to patient-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in heart failure using machine learning.利用机器学习从基于人群到基于患者的心力衰竭住院死亡率预测
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Mar 31;3(2):307-310. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac012. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Machine learning-derived prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory infection: analysis of claims data from the German-wide Helios hospital network.机器学习预测严重急性呼吸道感染患者的住院死亡率:德国 Helios 医院网络索赔数据分析。
Respir Res. 2022 Sep 23;23(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02180-w.
3
Machine ​learning algorithms for claims data-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure.基于索赔数据的机器学习算法预测心力衰竭患者住院死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3026-3036. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13398. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
4
Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Analyses of the MIMIC-III Database.机械通气患者的机器学习预测模型:对MIMIC-III数据库的分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 1;8:662340. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.662340. eCollection 2021.
5
Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Central Lymph Node Metastasis in T1-T2, Non-invasive, and Clinically Node Negative Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.应用机器学习算法预测T1-T2期、非侵袭性且临床淋巴结阴性的乳头状甲状腺癌的中央淋巴结转移
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 9;8:635771. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.635771. eCollection 2021.
6
Expected and observed in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Introduction of the machine learning-based standardized mortality ratio at Helios hospitals.心力衰竭患者在 COVID-19 大流行前后的预期和观察到的院内死亡率:引入基于机器学习的 Helios 医院标准化死亡率比。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 Jan;45(1):75-82. doi: 10.1002/clc.23762. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
7
Prediction of clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Machine-learning analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结局的预测:基于全国住院患者样本的机器学习分析
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 1;392:131339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131339. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
8
Machine learning methods to predict 30-day hospital readmission outcome among US adults with pneumonia: analysis of the national readmission database.机器学习方法预测美国成年人肺炎 30 天内住院再入院结局:国家再入院数据库分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01995-3.
9
Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: results from an Italian multicenter study.机器学习在预测 2019 年冠状病毒病患者住院死亡率中的应用:一项意大利多中心研究的结果。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2022 Jul 1;23(7):439-446. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001329.
10
Machine learning as a tool to identify inpatients who are not at risk of adverse drug events in a large dataset of a tertiary care hospital in the USA.机器学习在识别美国一家三级护理医院大型数据集中心非药物不良事件风险患者中的应用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Dec;89(12):3523-3538. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15846. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review.采用人工智能在心血管医学中的应用:范围综述。
Hypertens Res. 2024 Mar;47(3):685-699. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01469-7. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine ​learning algorithms for claims data-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure.基于索赔数据的机器学习算法预测心力衰竭患者住院死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3026-3036. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13398. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
2
In-hospital care in acute heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the German-wide Helios hospital network.COVID-19 大流行期间急性心力衰竭的院内治疗:来自德国 Helios 医院网络的见解。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;22(12):2190-2201. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2044. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
Machine learning does not improve upon traditional regression in predicting outcomes in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the ORBIT-AF and GARFIELD-AF registries.
机器学习在预测心房颤动结局方面并未优于传统回归分析:对 ORBIT-AF 和 GARFIELD-AF 注册研究的分析。
Europace. 2020 Nov 1;22(11):1635-1644. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa172.
4
Evaluating risk prediction models for adults with heart failure: A systematic literature review.评估成人心力衰竭风险预测模型:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0224135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224135. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
6
Leveraging Machine Learning Techniques to Forecast Patient Prognosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.利用机器学习技术预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的患者预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 22;12(14):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.035. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Prediction of Survival in Asian Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure: Validation of the OPTIMIZE-HF Risk Score.亚洲心力衰竭住院患者生存预测:OPTIMIZE-HF 风险评分的验证。
J Card Fail. 2019 Jul;25(7):571-575. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
8
Characterising risk of in-hospital mortality following cardiac arrest using machine learning: A retrospective international registry study.使用机器学习对心脏骤停后院内死亡率进行特征描述:一项回顾性国际登记研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 30;15(11):e1002709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002709. eCollection 2018 Nov.
9
Derivation and Validation of an In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Model Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance in Heart Failure.适合用于评估心力衰竭医院绩效的院内死亡率预测模型的推导和验证。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 8;7(4):e005256. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005256.
10
Risk prediction in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and analysis.心力衰竭患者的风险预测:系统评价和分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;2(5):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Sep 3.