• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用日志文件衍生误差和机器学习技术预测门静脉剂量测定质量保证结果。

Prediction of portal dosimetry quality assurance results using log files-derived errors and machine learning techniques.

作者信息

Lew Kah Seng, Chua Clifford Ghee Ann, Koh Calvin Wei Yang, Lee James Cheow Lei, Park Sung Yong, Tan Hong Qi

机构信息

Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 13;12:1096838. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1096838. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.1096838
PMID:36713533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9880542/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to use machine learning models to predict gamma passing rate of portal dosimetry quality assurance with log file derived features. This allows daily treatment monitoring for patients and reduce wear and tear on EPID detectors to save cost and prevent downtime.

METHODS

578 VMAT trajectory log files selected from prostate, lung and spine SBRT were used in this work. Four machine learning models were explored to identify the best performing regression model for predicting gamma passing rate within each sub-site and the entire unstratified data. Predictors used in these models comprised of hand-crafted log file-derived features as well as modulation complexity score. Cross validation was used to evaluate the model performance in terms of R and RMSE.

RESULT

Using gamma passing rate of 1%/1mm criteria and entire dataset, LASSO regression has a R of 0.121 ± 0.005 and RMSE of 4.794 ± 0.013%, SVM regression has a R of 0.605 ± 0.036 and RMSE of 3.210 ± 0.145%, Random Forest regression has a R of 0.940 ± 0.019 and RMSE of 1.233 ± 0.197%. XGBoost regression has the best performance with a R and RMSE value of 0.981 ± 0.015 and 0.652 ± 0.276%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Log file-derived features can predict gamma passing rate of portal dosimetry with an average error of less than 2% using the 1%/1mm criteria. This model can potentially be applied to predict the patient specific QA results for every treatment fraction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用机器学习模型,通过从日志文件中提取的特征来预测门静脉剂量测定质量保证的伽马通过率。这有助于对患者进行每日治疗监测,减少电子射野影像装置(EPID)探测器的磨损,从而节省成本并防止停机。

方法

本研究使用了从前列腺、肺部和脊柱立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)中选取的578个容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)轨迹日志文件。探索了四种机器学习模型,以确定在每个子部位以及整个未分层数据中预测伽马通过率的最佳回归模型。这些模型中使用的预测因子包括手工制作的日志文件衍生特征以及调制复杂度得分。采用交叉验证来评估模型在R和均方根误差(RMSE)方面的性能。

结果

使用1%/1mm标准和整个数据集时,套索回归的R值为0.121±0.005,RMSE为4.794±0.013%;支持向量机回归的R值为0.605±0.036,RMSE为3.210±0.145%;随机森林回归的R值为0.940±0.019,RMSE为1.233±0.197%。极端梯度提升(XGBoost)回归性能最佳,R值和RMSE值分别为0.981±0.015和0.652±0.276%。

结论

使用1%/1mm标准时,从日志文件中提取的特征能够预测门静脉剂量测定的伽马通过率,平均误差小于2%。该模型有可能应用于预测每个治疗分次的患者特定质量保证结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/ff38a298005f/fonc-12-1096838-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/de7955a58cb6/fonc-12-1096838-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/e798e9da3c84/fonc-12-1096838-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/7d4fe2964c4f/fonc-12-1096838-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/9d5fe69419bd/fonc-12-1096838-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/d914007801e5/fonc-12-1096838-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/ff38a298005f/fonc-12-1096838-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/de7955a58cb6/fonc-12-1096838-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/e798e9da3c84/fonc-12-1096838-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/7d4fe2964c4f/fonc-12-1096838-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/9d5fe69419bd/fonc-12-1096838-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/d914007801e5/fonc-12-1096838-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e82/9880542/ff38a298005f/fonc-12-1096838-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of portal dosimetry quality assurance results using log files-derived errors and machine learning techniques.使用日志文件衍生误差和机器学习技术预测门静脉剂量测定质量保证结果。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 13;12:1096838. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1096838. eCollection 2022.
2
Predicting gamma passing rates for portal dosimetry-based IMRT QA using machine learning.使用机器学习预测基于门控剂量学的调强放射治疗 QA 的伽马通过率。
Med Phys. 2019 Oct;46(10):4666-4675. doi: 10.1002/mp.13752. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files.基于日志文件提供的投递剂量信息的深度学习:预测调强放疗的伽马通过率。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221104881. doi: 10.1177/15330338221104881.
4
Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.基于体模和日志文件的患者特定 QA 与 VMAT 复杂性评分的相关性。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Nov 8;15(6):4994. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4994.
5
A novel approach to SBRT patient quality assurance using EPID-based real-time transit dosimetry : A step to QA with in vivo EPID dosimetry.一种使用基于 EPID 的实时传输剂量学进行 SBRT 患者质量保证的新方法:采用体内 EPID 剂量学进行 QA 的步骤。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Feb;196(2):182-192. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01549-z. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Machine learning models to predict the delivered positions of Elekta multileaf collimator leaves for volumetric modulated arc therapy.机器学习模型预测 Elekta 多叶准直器叶片在容积调强弧形治疗中的投递位置。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Aug;23(8):e13667. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13667. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
Study of the prediction of gamma passing rate in dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using machine learning models based on plan complexity.基于计划复杂性的机器学习模型在调强放射治疗剂量验证中伽马通过率预测的研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 21;13:1094927. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1094927. eCollection 2023.
8
IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi-institutional validation.使用机器学习的调强放射治疗质量保证:多机构验证
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Sep;18(5):279-284. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12161. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
9
Detecting MLC modeling errors using radiomics-based machine learning in patient-specific QA with an EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.利用基于放射组学的机器学习在 EPID 用于调强放射治疗的个体化 QA 中检测 MLC 建模误差。
Med Phys. 2021 Mar;48(3):991-1002. doi: 10.1002/mp.14699. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans.评估 4-Hz 日志文件和二次蒙特卡罗剂量计算在 VMAT 前列腺计划中的患者特异性质量保证中的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jul;22(7):235-244. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13315. Epub 2021 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Error sensitivity of a log file analysis tool compared with a helical diode array dosimeter for VMAT delivery quality assurance.与螺旋二极管阵列剂量仪相比,日志文件分析工具对容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)输送质量保证的误差敏感性
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Nov;21(11):163-171. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13051. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
What is plan quality in radiotherapy? The importance of evaluating dose metrics, complexity, and robustness of treatment plans.放疗中的计划质量是指什么?评估剂量指标、计划复杂性和稳健性的重要性。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.038. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance.
治疗计划的复杂性并不能预测 IROC 休斯顿人体头颈部模体的性能。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Oct 17;63(20):205015. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae29e.
4
Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology: Opportunities, Requirements, and Needs.放射肿瘤学中的机器学习:机遇、要求与需求
Front Oncol. 2018 Apr 17;8:110. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00110. eCollection 2018.
5
Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218.调强放射治疗(IMRT)测量验证 QA 的容忍限度和方法:AAPM 工作组第 218 号报告的建议。
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):e53-e83. doi: 10.1002/mp.12810. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
6
Gamma index comparison of three VMAT QA systems and evaluation of their sensitivity to delivery errors.三种容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)质量保证(QA)系统的伽马指数比较及其对传输误差的敏感性评估。
Phys Med. 2015 Nov;31(7):720-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
7
Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.独立剂量计算效率和有效性的评估,以及对传统基于机器日志文件分析的 IMRT QA 的评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Sep 6;13(5):3837. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3837.
8
A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability.用于评估调强放疗调制复杂度和计划可交付性的新指标。
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):505-15. doi: 10.1118/1.3276775.
9
Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.第142任务组报告:医用加速器的质量保证
Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4197-212. doi: 10.1118/1.3190392.
10
A literature review of electronic portal imaging for radiotherapy dosimetry.用于放射治疗剂量测定的电子射野影像系统的文献综述。
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Sep;88(3):289-309. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Aug 14.