Suppr超能文献

导师行为互动评分标准的开发与内容效度测试

Development and Content Validity Testing of the Mentor Behavioral Interaction Rubric.

作者信息

Tigges B, Sood A, Mickel N, Dominguez N, Helitzer D

机构信息

University of New Mexico, University of Oklahoma, & Arizona State University.

出版信息

Chron Mentor Coach. 2022 Dec;6(Spec Iss 15):630-636.

Abstract

Many mentor training interventions in higher education focus on improving interactions between mentors and mentees. Existing measures of interactions are based on reported perceptions of the mentor or mentee. However, there are currently no objective assessments of the mentor's behavioral skill. The purpose of this study was to develop a Mentor Behavioral Interaction (MBI) Rubric as a measure of a mentor's behavioral skill during single-episode interactions with a mentee. Subsequently, the content validity was assessed. The six items (Part 1), evaluated by five mentoring experts as quantifiable behaviors in any mentor-mentee interaction, were based on the Mentoring Competency Assessment (Fleming et al., 2013). The experts developed scoring criteria (highest, middle, and lowest performance) for each item, and created another eleven items (Part 2) to characterize the content (yes/no) of the interaction. Seven content experts rated the items and scoring criteria using a scale ranging from very (4) to not relevant (1) (Lynn, 1986). Five of the six Part 1 items and scoring criteria, and nine of the eleven Part 2 items had item content validity indices (I-CVI) ≥ 0.86. The Part 1 "motivates" item and scoring, and the Part 2 "personal/professional preferences" item were revised based on expert recommendations. One Part 2 item was deleted. Average scale content validity indices (S-CVI/Ave) were ≥ 0.90. The MBI Rubric is the first measure developed to assess single episodes of videoed mentor-mentee interactions. The Rubric may be used with other measures to assess the effectiveness of mentor training. Limitations include: evaluation of the mentor's behavior without accounting for the mentee's behavior; inability to infer cognitive processes; and focus on the quality of one interaction, rather than the effectiveness of the relationship over time. Future work will assess inter-rater reliability, sensitivity to change, and construct validity for the Rubric.

摘要

高等教育中的许多导师培训干预措施都侧重于改善导师与学员之间的互动。现有的互动衡量方法基于导师或学员报告的看法。然而,目前尚无对导师行为技能的客观评估。本研究的目的是开发一种导师行为互动(MBI)评分标准,以衡量导师在与学员的单次互动中的行为技能。随后,对内容效度进行了评估。由五位指导专家评估为在任何导师-学员互动中可量化行为的六个项目(第1部分),是基于指导能力评估(弗莱明等人,2013年)。专家们为每个项目制定了评分标准(最高、中等和最低表现),并创建了另外十一个项目(第2部分)来描述互动的内容(是/否)。七位内容专家使用从非常(4)到不相关(1)的量表(林恩,1986年)对这些项目和评分标准进行了评分。第1部分的六个项目中有五个以及评分标准,第2部分的十一个项目中有九个的项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)≥0.86。第1部分的“激励”项目及评分,以及第2部分的“个人/职业偏好”项目根据专家建议进行了修订。第2部分的一个项目被删除。平均量表内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)≥0.90。MBI评分标准是首个开发用于评估视频记录的导师-学员互动单次情节的测量工具。该评分标准可与其他测量方法一起用于评估导师培训的效果。局限性包括:在不考虑学员行为的情况下评估导师的行为;无法推断认知过程;以及关注一次互动的质量,而非随着时间推移关系的有效性。未来的工作将评估该评分标准的评分者间信度、对变化的敏感性和结构效度。

相似文献

9
Mentor-mentee relationship in medicine.医学中的导师-学员关系。
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;40(1):48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验