Suppr超能文献

中度至重度新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中地塞米松与体重调整剂量甲泼尼龙的比较。

Dexamethasone versus weight-adjusted methylprednisolone in patients with moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

作者信息

Aomar-Millán Ismael F, Fatoul-Del Pino Geoorgette, Torres-Parejo Úrsula, Pérez Fernández Laura, Martínez-Diz Silvia, Salvatierra Juan

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Med Clin (Engl Ed). 2023 Feb 24;160(4):156-159. doi: 10.1016/j.medcle.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the 30-day outcome (mortality and/or ICU admission) of patients admitted for moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with dexamethasone after the Recovery study versus those treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 65 patients with moderate-severe pneumonia who received dexamethasone 6 mg/day (DXM group) versus 80 treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone (MTPN group).

RESULTS

21 (32.3%) patients in the DXM group died vs 8 (10%) in the MTPN group (p-value < 0.001) and 29 (44.6%) in the DXM group required ICU admission vs 2 (2,5%) of the MTPN group (p-value <0.001). There were no baseline differences regarding sociodemographic characteristics with a higher mean qSOFA in the MTPN group. The hazard ratio for mortality and ICU admission adjusted for age, sex, and admission CRP was 2.189 (1.082-4.426; 95% CI) and 10.589 (2.139-48.347; 95% CI) for the DXM group, respectively, vs. MTPN group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality and admission to the ICU were lower in patients treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone compared to those treated with dexamethasone.

摘要

目的

比较在康复研究后接受地塞米松治疗的中度至重度SARS-CoV-2肺炎患者与接受体重调整的甲泼尼龙治疗的患者的30天结局(死亡率和/或入住重症监护病房)。

方法

对65例接受6毫克/天的地塞米松治疗的中度至重度肺炎患者(地塞米松组)和80例接受体重调整的甲泼尼龙治疗的患者(甲泼尼龙组)进行回顾性队列研究。

结果

地塞米松组21例(32.3%)患者死亡,而甲泼尼龙组为8例(10%)(p值<0.001);地塞米松组29例(44.6%)患者需要入住重症监护病房,而甲泼尼龙组为2例(2.5%)(p值<0.001)。两组在社会人口统计学特征方面无基线差异,但甲泼尼龙组的平均序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)较高。在对年龄、性别和入院时的C反应蛋白进行调整后,地塞米松组与甲泼尼龙组相比,死亡和入住重症监护病房的风险比分别为2.189(1.082 - 4.426;95%置信区间)和10.589(2.139 - 48.347;95%置信区间)。

结论

与接受地塞米松治疗的患者相比,接受体重调整的甲泼尼龙治疗的患者死亡率和入住重症监护病房的比例更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dac/9870753/6aa6c7898d0b/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验