Patel Parth U, Bock David, Hettinger Christian A
Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kansas City Urology Care, Overland Park, KS, USA.
Curr Urol. 2022 Dec;16(4):213-217. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000140. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
To provide concise information to clinicians on how to better interpret multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer risk stratification.
We analyzed 2 separate cohorts. For patients receiving a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) score of 1 or 2, we reviewed the charts of 226 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate ordered from 2015 to 2017 to determine who developed clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by August 27, 2020. For patients receiving PI-RADSv2 a score of 3, 4, or 5, we reviewed the results of 733 fusion biopsies on solitary lesions. Statistical analysis was used to further determine risk factors for csPCa.
Ten percent of men with PI-RADSv2 a score of 1 eventually developed csPCa. Seven percent with a score of 2 were eventually diagnosed with csPCa. Only 1 of 226 with a score of 1 or 2 developed metastasis. For PI-RADSv2 scores of 3, 4, and 5, csPCa was detected in 16%, 45%, and 67% of fusion biopsies. Peripheral zone (PZ) PI-RADSv2 score of 4 or 5 and prostate-specific antigen density (PSA-D) were significant predictors of csPCa on multivariable analysis. Using a PSA-D × PI-RADSv2 score of ≤0.39, we identified 38% of men with a PI-RADSv2 score of 3 in the PZ or 3, 4, or 5 in the transition zone who could have avoided a benign biopsy.
The vast majority of patients with PI-RADSv2 scores 1 and 2 can be safely monitored with close surveillance. Lesions with PI-RADSv2 scores of 4 and 5 in the PZ should be biopsied. Peripheral zone lesions with a PI-RADSv2 score of 3 and transition zone lesions with 3, 4, or 5 can be risk-stratified using the PSA-D × PI-RADSv2 score to determine who may safely avoid a biopsy and who should proceed to fusion biopsy.
为临床医生提供简明信息,说明如何更好地解读多参数磁共振成像以进行前列腺癌风险分层。
我们分析了两个独立队列。对于前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADSv2)评分为1或2的患者,我们回顾了2015年至2017年接受前列腺多参数磁共振成像检查的226例患者的病历,以确定截至2020年8月27日哪些患者发展为临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)。对于PI-RADSv2评分为3、4或5的患者,我们回顾了733例对孤立性病变进行融合活检的结果。采用统计分析进一步确定csPCa的危险因素。
PI-RADSv2评分为1的男性中,10%最终发展为csPCa。评分为2的患者中,7%最终被诊断为csPCa。226例评分为1或2的患者中只有1例发生转移。对于PI-RADSv2评分为3、4和5的患者,融合活检中分别有16%、45%和67%检测到csPCa。多变量分析显示,外周带(PZ)PI-RADSv2评分为4或5以及前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSA-D)是csPCa的显著预测因素。使用PSA-D×PI-RADSv2评分≤0.39,我们确定了PZ中PI-RADSv2评分为3或移行带中评分为3、4或5的男性患者中有38%可以避免进行良性活检。
绝大多数PI-RADSv2评分为1和2的患者可通过密切监测安全随访。PZ中PI-RADSv2评分为4和5的病变应进行活检。PZ中PI-RADSv2评分为3的外周带病变以及移行带中评分为3、4或5的病变可以使用PSA-D×PI-RADSv2评分进行风险分层,以确定哪些患者可以安全地避免活检,哪些患者应进行融合活检。