From the Center for Interventional Oncology (J.N.T., H.A.N., P.S., B.J.W.), Molecular Imaging Program (F.V.M., P.L.C., B.T.), Laboratory of Pathology (M.J.M.), and Urologic Oncology Branch (P.A.P.), National Cancer Institute and Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, Building 10, MSC 1182, Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892; Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.K.G.); and Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Md (M.M.S.).
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):485-491. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170425. Epub 2018 May 22.
Purpose To determine the association between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 scores and prostate cancer (PCa) in a cohort of patients undergoing biopsy of transition zone (TZ) lesions. Materials and Methods A total of 634 TZ lesions in 457 patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients undergoing prostate magnetic resonance imaging. Prostate lesions were retrospectively categorized with the PI-RADS version 2 system by two readers in consensus who were blinded to histopathologic findings. The proportion of cancer detection for all PCa and for clinically important PCa (Gleason score ≥3+4) for each PI-RADS version 2 category was determined. The performance of PI-RADS version 2 in cancer detection was evaluated. Results For PI-RADS category 2 lesions, the overall proportion of cancers was 4% (one of 25), without any clinically important cancer. For PI-RADS category 3, 4, and 5 lesions, the overall proportion of cancers was 22.2% (78 of 352), 39.1% (43 of 110), and 87.8% (129 of 147), respectively, and the proportion of clinically important cancers was 11.1% (39 of 352), 29.1% (32 of 110), and 77.6% (114 of 147), respectively. Higher PI-RADS version 2 scores were associated with increasing likelihood of the presence of clinically important PCa (P < .001). Differences were found in the percentage of cancers in the PI-RADS category between PI-RADS 3 and those upgraded to PI-RADS 4 based on diffusion-weighted imaging for clinically important cancers (proportion for clinically important cancers for PI-RADS 3 and PI-RADS 3+1 were 11.1% [39 of 352] and 30.8% [28 of 91], respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Higher PI-RADS version 2 scores are associated with a higher proportion of clinically important cancers in the TZ. PI-RADS category 2 lesions rarely yield PCa, and their presence does not justify targeted biopsy.
在接受经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的患者中,评估前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第 2 版评分与前列腺癌(PCa)之间的相关性,该研究纳入了经前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)检查发现的移行带(TZ)病变。
该研究从连续接受前列腺 MRI 检查的患者前瞻性数据库中,共确定了 457 例患者的 634 个 TZ 病变。由 2 名读者通过 PI-RADS 第 2 版系统对前列腺病变进行回顾性分类,他们对组织病理学结果不知情。确定了每个 PI-RADS 第 2 版分类中所有 PCa 和临床显著 PCa(Gleason 评分≥3+4)的检出率。评估 PI-RADS 第 2 版在癌症检测中的性能。
对于 PI-RADS 类别 2 病变,癌症的总体检出率为 4%(25 个病变中的 1 个),没有任何临床显著的癌症。对于 PI-RADS 类别 3、4 和 5 病变,癌症的总体检出率分别为 22.2%(352 个病变中的 78 个)、39.1%(110 个病变中的 43 个)和 87.8%(147 个病变中的 129 个),临床显著癌症的检出率分别为 11.1%(352 个病变中的 39 个)、29.1%(110 个病变中的 32 个)和 77.6%(147 个病变中的 114 个)。较高的 PI-RADS 第 2 版评分与临床显著 PCa 的存在几率增加相关(P<.001)。在 PI-RADS 类别 3 和根据弥散加权成像升级为 PI-RADS 4 的病变之间,临床显著癌症的 PI-RADS 类别中癌症的百分比存在差异(PI-RADS 3 和 PI-RADS 3+1 中临床显著癌症的比例分别为 11.1%(39 个病变中的 39 个)和 30.8%(91 个病变中的 28 个);P<.001)。
PI-RADS 第 2 版评分较高与 TZ 中临床显著癌症的比例较高相关。PI-RADS 类别 2 病变很少产生 PCa,其存在并不能证明靶向活检的合理性。