Suppr超能文献

根据早期指数增长进行估算:1918年流感大流行与2020年新冠病毒大流行的相似之处

Estimating from early exponential growth: parallels between 1918 influenza and 2020 SARS-CoV-2 pandemics.

作者信息

Foster Grant, Elderd Bret D, Richards Robert L, Dallas Tad

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2022 Sep 17;1(4):pgac194. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac194. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

The large spatial scale, geographical overlap, and similarities in transmission mode between the 1918 H1N1 influenza and 2020 SARS-CoV-2 pandemics together provide a novel opportunity to investigate relationships between transmission of two different diseases in the same location. To this end, we use initial exponential growth rates in a Bayesian hierarchical framework to estimate the basic reproductive number, , of both disease outbreaks in a common set of 43 cities in the United States. By leveraging multiple epidemic time series across a large spatial area, we are able to better characterize the variation in across the United States. Additionally, we provide one of the first city-level comparisons of between these two pandemics and explore how demography and outbreak timing are related to . Despite similarities in transmission modes and a common set of locations, estimates for COVID-19 were uncorrelated with estimates of pandemic influenza in the same cities. Also, the relationships between and key population or epidemic traits differed between diseases. For example, epidemics that started later tended to be less severe for COVID-19, while influenza epidemics exhibited an opposite pattern. Our results suggest that despite similarities between diseases, epidemics starting in the same location may differ markedly in their initial progression.

摘要

1918年H1N1流感大流行和2020年SARS-CoV-2大流行在空间尺度、地理重叠以及传播模式上的相似性,共同提供了一个全新的机会,用以研究同一地点两种不同疾病传播之间的关系。为此,我们在贝叶斯分层框架中使用初始指数增长率,来估计美国43个共同城市中这两种疾病爆发的基本再生数 (R_0)。通过利用大空间区域内的多个疫情时间序列,我们能够更好地描述美国各地 (R_0) 的变化情况。此外,我们首次对这两种大流行的 (R_0) 进行了城市层面的比较,并探讨了人口统计学和疫情爆发时间与 (R_0) 的关系。尽管传播模式相似且地点相同,但同一城市中COVID-19的 (R_0) 估计值与大流行性流感的 (R_0) 估计值不相关。而且,两种疾病的 (R_0) 与关键人群或疫情特征之间的关系也有所不同。例如,对于COVID-19来说,开始较晚的疫情往往不太严重,而流感疫情则呈现相反的模式。我们的结果表明,尽管疾病之间存在相似性,但在同一地点开始的疫情在其初始进展上可能存在显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/551b/9802102/2864f03a77a8/pgac194fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验