• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of a Polypill, Aspirin, and the Combination of Both on Cognitive and Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.复方药、阿司匹林及其联合应用对认知和功能结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Mar 1;80(3):251-259. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5088.
2
Polypill with or without Aspirin in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease.无心血管疾病人群中使用含或不含阿司匹林的复方药。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 21;384(3):216-228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028220. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
3
Effects of a polypill (Polycap) on risk factors in middle-aged individuals without cardiovascular disease (TIPS): a phase II, double-blind, randomised trial.一种复方制剂(Polycap)对无心血管疾病中年个体危险因素的影响(TIPS):一项II期双盲随机试验。
Lancet. 2009 Apr 18;373(9672):1341-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60611-5. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
4
Estimated cardiovascular relative risk reduction from fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) treatment in a wide range of patients with a moderate risk of cardiovascular disease.固定剂量复方药丸(多效药丸)治疗对广泛的中度心血管疾病风险患者心血管相对风险降低的估计。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Aug;23(12):1289-97. doi: 10.1177/2047487315624523. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
5
Comparison of risk factor reduction and tolerability of a full-dose polypill (with potassium) versus low-dose polypill (polycap) in individuals at high risk of cardiovascular diseases: the Second Indian Polycap Study (TIPS-2) investigators.全剂量复方药丸(含钾)与低剂量复方药丸(复方制剂)对心血管疾病高危个体危险因素降低及耐受性的比较:第二次印度复方制剂研究(TIPS-2)研究者
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jul 1;5(4):463-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963637. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
6
Effects of blood pressure and lipid lowering on cognition: Results from the HOPE-3 study.血压和血脂降低对认知的影响:HOPE-3 研究结果。
Neurology. 2019 Mar 26;92(13):e1435-e1446. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007174. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Effects of a fixed-dose combination strategy on adherence and risk factors in patients with or at high risk of CVD: the UMPIRE randomized clinical trial.固定剂量联合策略对 CVD 患者或高危患者的依从性及相关风险因素的影响:UMPIRE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Sep 4;310(9):918-29. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.277064.
9
Impact of switching from different treatment regimens to a fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) in patients with cardiovascular disease or similarly high risk.心血管疾病患者或具有类似高风险的患者从不同治疗方案转换为固定剂量复方药丸(多效药丸)的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jun;24(9):951-961. doi: 10.1177/2047487317695616. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
10
A pragmatic randomized trial of a polypill-based strategy to improve use of indicated preventive treatments in people at high cardiovascular disease risk.一项基于复方药丸策略改善高危心血管疾病人群接受既定预防治疗的实用随机试验。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jul;22(7):920-30. doi: 10.1177/2047487314530382. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the standard assessment of global everyday activities (SAGEA) scale for dementia diagnosis.用于痴呆诊断的日常活动综合标准评估(SAGEA)量表的验证
Age Ageing. 2025 May 3;54(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf115.
2
2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.《2025年心脏病和中风统计数据:美国心脏协会关于美国和全球数据的报告》
Circulation. 2025 Feb 25;151(8):e41-e660. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: Mechanisms, treatment, and future directions.血管性认知障碍与痴呆:机制、治疗及未来方向
Int J Stroke. 2024 Oct;19(8):838-856. doi: 10.1177/17474930241279888.
4
Polypill versus medication monotherapy in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Iran: An economic evaluation study.伊朗预防心血管疾病中多效药丸与单一药物治疗的比较:一项经济评估研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 5;7(7):e2240. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2240. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
New pharmacological agents and novel cardiovascular pharmacotherapy strategies in 2023.2023 年新的药理学药物和新型心血管药物治疗策略。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 May 4;10(3):219-244. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae013.
6
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.2024 年心脏病与中风统计数据:美国心脏协会发布的美国和全球数据报告。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
7
Antiplatelet therapy and incident cognitive impairment or dementia-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.抗血小板治疗与新发认知障碍或痴呆症:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2023 Oct 2;52(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad197.
8
Redefining the polypill: pros and cons in cardiovascular precision medicine.重新定义复方制剂:心血管精准医学中的利弊
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 19;14:1268119. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1268119. eCollection 2023.

复方药、阿司匹林及其联合应用对认知和功能结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effects of a Polypill, Aspirin, and the Combination of Both on Cognitive and Functional Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2023 Mar 1;80(3):251-259. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5088.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5088
PMID:36716007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9887530/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Vascular risk factors are associated with cognitive decline but studies addressing individual risk factors have not demonstrated an effect of risk factor management on the preservation of cognition. Few trials have examined the effect of vascular risk factor management on function.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a polypill could reduce cognitive and functional decline in people with risk factors but without manifest cardiovascular disease.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The International Polycap Study 3 (TIPS-3) was a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial randomized clinical trial. Hospital and community-based centers in 8 countries recruited and followed up participants between July 30, 2012, and September 30, 2020. A total of 5713 individuals were randomly assigned to treatment groups, and 2098 people 65 years or older at intermediate risk of cardiovascular disease completed a cognitive assessment and were included in the analyses.

INTERVENTIONS

Polypill (antihypertensives and a statin), aspirin, or a combination of both treatments.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cognitive and functional assessments completed at baseline, 2 years, and study end. The primary outcome was the effect of a polypill compared with placebo and a polypill plus aspirin compared with double placebo on the composite outcome of the proportion of participants in each group who experienced a substantive decrease (>1.5 SD change) in cognitive or functional abilities.

RESULTS

Of the 2389 study participants older than 65 years, a total of 2098 (88%; mean [SD] age, 70.1 [4.5] years; 1266 female individuals [60%]) completed the baseline and follow-up assessment. A total of 1796 participants (86%) had hypertension, and 680 participants (32%) had impaired fasting plasma glucose levels. Mean (SD) baseline systolic blood pressure was 146.1 (17.7) mm Hg, and mean (SD) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level was 124.3 (40.7) mg/dL and decreased by 5.7 mm Hg and 24 mg/dL, respectively, among those assigned to the polypill group. During a 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between treatment groups in the number of participants who experienced substantive cognitive decline (356 assigned polypill, 328 assigned placebo) or dementia (2 assigned polypill, 4 assigned placebo). Functional decline was reduced during follow-up for those assigned to polypill compared with placebo (mean [SD] country-standardized adjusted follow-up Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities [SAGEA] scores, 0.06 [0.03] vs 0.15 [0.03]; P = .01) and polypill plus aspirin compared with double placebo (mean [SD] country-standardized adjusted follow-up SAGEA scores, 0.01 [0.04] vs 0.14 [0.04]; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial of patients 65 years or older with vascular risk factors, a polypill, with or without aspirin, was not associated with reduced cognitive outcomes but was associated with reduced functional decline.

摘要

重要性

血管风险因素与认知能力下降有关,但研究单个风险因素并未表明风险因素管理对认知能力的保护有效果。很少有试验研究血管风险因素管理对功能的影响。

目的

确定复方药能否降低有风险因素但无明显心血管疾病的人群的认知和功能下降。

设计、地点和参与者:国际多药胶囊研究 3 期(TIPS-3)是一项 2×2×2 析因随机临床试验。8 个国家的医院和社区中心招募并随访了参与者,时间为 2012 年 7 月 30 日至 2020 年 9 月 30 日。共有 5713 人被随机分配到治疗组,2098 名年龄在 65 岁及以上、有中等心血管疾病风险的人完成了认知评估,并纳入了分析。

干预措施

复方药(降压药和他汀类药物)、阿司匹林或两者联合治疗。

主要结局和测量指标

基线、2 年和研究结束时的认知和功能评估。主要结局是与安慰剂相比,复方药组与复方药加阿司匹林组相比,对每个组中经历认知或功能能力实质性下降(>1.5 SD 变化)的参与者比例的复合结局的影响。

结果

在 2389 名年龄大于 65 岁的研究参与者中,共有 2098 名(88%;平均[标准差]年龄为 70.1[4.5]岁;1266 名女性[60%])完成了基线和随访评估。共有 1796 名参与者(86%)患有高血压,680 名参与者(32%)有空腹血糖受损。基线收缩压的平均(标准差)为 146.1(17.7)mmHg,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平的平均(标准差)为 124.3(40.7)mg/dL,分别下降了 5.7mmHg 和 24mg/dL,在接受复方药治疗的参与者中。在 5 年的随访中,接受复方药治疗的参与者中出现认知能力实质性下降的人数(356 名接受复方药,328 名接受安慰剂)或痴呆(2 名接受复方药,4 名接受安慰剂)与安慰剂治疗组之间没有显著差异。与安慰剂相比,接受复方药治疗的参与者的功能下降在随访期间有所减少(平均[标准差]经国家标准化调整后的随访标准评估日常活动[Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities,SAGEA]评分,0.06[0.03]与 0.15[0.03];P=0.01),与双安慰剂相比,接受复方药加阿司匹林治疗的参与者的功能下降也有所减少(平均[标准差]经国家标准化调整后的随访 SAGEA 评分,0.01[0.04]与 0.14[0.04];P=0.01)。

结论和相关性

在这项对 65 岁及以上有血管风险因素的患者进行的随机临床试验中,复方药(无论是否联合阿司匹林)与认知结局的降低无关,但与功能下降的减少有关。