Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情封锁期间的环境掌控与生活目的:一项深化个人及社区复原力作用的研究

Environmental mastery and purpose of life during COVID-19-related lockdown: A study deepening the role of personal and community resilience.

作者信息

Procentese Fortuna, Gatti Flora

机构信息

Department of Humanities University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy.

出版信息

J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 Nov 29. doi: 10.1002/casp.2671.

Abstract

COVID-19 outbreak and the measures needed to contain its first wave of contagion produced broad changes in citizens' daily lives, routines, and social opportunities, putting their environmental mastery and purpose of life at risk. However, these measures produced different impacts across citizens and communities. Building on this, the present study addresses citizens' understanding of the rationale for COVID-19-related protective measures and their perception of their own and their community's resilience as protective dimensions to unravel the selective effect of nationwide lockdown orders. An online questionnaire was administered to Italian citizens during Italian nationwide lockdown. Two moderation models were performed using the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) path analysis. The results show that the understanding of the rationale for lockdown only associated with citizens' purpose of life and that it represented a risk factor rather than a protective one. Furthermore, the interaction effects were significant only when community resilience was involved. That is, personal resilience did not show the expected moderation effect, while community resilience did. However, the latter varied between being either full or partial depending on the dependent variable. In light of the above, the theoretical and practical implications of these results will be discussed.

摘要

新冠疫情的爆发以及遏制其第一波传播所需的措施,给公民的日常生活、日常事务和社会机会带来了广泛变化,使他们对环境的掌控能力和生活目标面临风险。然而,这些措施对不同的公民和社区产生了不同的影响。基于此,本研究探讨公民对新冠相关防护措施基本原理的理解,以及他们对自身和社区恢复力作为保护维度的认知,以揭示全国性封锁令的选择性影响。在意大利全国封锁期间,对意大利公民进行了一项在线问卷调查。使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)路径分析进行了两个调节模型分析。结果表明,对封锁基本原理的理解仅与公民的生活目标相关,并且它代表的是一个风险因素而非保护因素。此外,仅当涉及社区恢复力时,交互效应才显著。也就是说,个人恢复力未显示出预期的调节效应,而社区恢复力则显示出了这种效应。然而,根据因变量的不同,后者在完全或部分调节之间有所变化。鉴于上述情况,将讨论这些结果的理论和实际意义。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Community dimensions and emotions in the era of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的社区维度与情感
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):358-373. doi: 10.1002/casp.2560. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
8
Sense of Coherence and COVID-19: A Longitudinal Study.韧性与 COVID-19:一项纵向研究。
J Psychol. 2021;155(7):657-677. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2021.1952151. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验