• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

净推荐值(NPS)作为评估儿科重症监护病房家长满意度的工具。

Net Promoter Score (NPS) as a tool to assess parental satisfaction in pediatric intensive care units.

机构信息

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Pediatria e Saúde da Criança da Escola de Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Pediatria e Saúde da Criança da Escola de Medicina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 May-Jun;99(3):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.11.013. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2022.11.013
PMID:36720434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10202723/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To verify the performance of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) as a tool to assess parental satisfaction in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).

METHODS

The authors conducted an observational cross-sectional multicenter study in the PICUs of 5 hospitals in Brazil. Eligible participants were all parents or legal guardians of PICU-admitted children, aged 18 years or over. The NPS was administered together with the EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care (EMPATHIC-30), used as the gold standard, and a sociodemographic questionnaire. For analysis, the results were dichotomized into values greater than or equal to the median of the tests. The associations between the 2 tools were evaluated and the distribution of their results was compared.

RESULTS

The parents or legal guardians of 78 PICU-admitted children were interviewed. Of the respondents, 85% were women and 62% were in a private hospital. The median NPS was 10 (IQR, 10-10), and the median EMPATHIC-30 score was 5.7 (IQR, 5.4-5.9). Compared with the gold standard, the NPS had a sensitivity of 100% at all cutoff points, except at cutoff 10, where the sensitivity was slightly lower (97.5%). As for specificity, NPS performance was poorer, with values ranging from 0% (NPS ≥ 5) to 47.4% (NPS = 10).

CONCLUSIONS

NPS proved to be a sensitive tool to assess parental satisfaction, but with poor ability to identify dissatisfied users in the sample.

摘要

目的

验证净推荐值(NPS)作为评估儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中家长满意度的工具的性能。

方法

作者在巴西 5 家医院的 PICU 中进行了一项观察性横断面多中心研究。合格的参与者为 PICU 住院儿童的父母或法定监护人,年龄在 18 岁或以上。NPS 与作为金标准的家长赋权在重症监护中量表(EMPATHIC-30)以及一份社会人口统计学问卷一起进行评估。为了进行分析,结果被分为大于或等于测试中位数的值。评估了两种工具之间的关联,并比较了它们结果的分布。

结果

对 78 名 PICU 住院儿童的家长或法定监护人进行了访谈。受访者中,85%为女性,62%在私立医院。NPS 的中位数为 10(IQR,10-10),EMPATHIC-30 评分的中位数为 5.7(IQR,5.4-5.9)。与金标准相比,NPS 在所有截止点的敏感性均为 100%,除了截止点 10 稍低(97.5%)。特异性方面,NPS 的表现较差,其值范围从 0%(NPS≥5)到 47.4%(NPS=10)。

结论

NPS 被证明是评估家长满意度的一种敏感工具,但识别样本中不满意用户的能力较差。

相似文献

1
Net Promoter Score (NPS) as a tool to assess parental satisfaction in pediatric intensive care units.净推荐值(NPS)作为评估儿科重症监护病房家长满意度的工具。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 May-Jun;99(3):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.11.013. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
2
[Spanish translation and validation of the EMPATHIC-30 questionnaire to measure parental satisfaction in intensive care units].[用于测量重症监护病房中家长满意度的EMPATHIC - 30问卷的西班牙语翻译及验证]
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2018 Jul;89(1):50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
3
EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care Questionnaire: Translation and Validation in Italian PICUs.重症监护问卷中家长赋权:意大利儿科重症监护病房的翻译与验证
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):e77-e85. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001031.
4
Brazilian Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care 30 (EMPATHIC-30) Questionnaire to Measure Parental Satisfaction in PICUs.巴西文翻译、跨文化调适、有效性和可靠性的父母赋权在重症监护室 30 (EMPATHIC-30)问卷来衡量儿科重症监护病房的父母满意度。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):e339-e348. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002594.
5
Construction and psychometric testing of the EMPATHIC questionnaire measuring parent satisfaction in the pediatric intensive care unit.构建并心理计量检验 EMPATHIC 问卷,以测量儿科重症监护病房中家长的满意度。
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Feb;37(2):310-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2042-y. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
6
Spanish adaptation and validation of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care-neonatology (EMPATHIC-N) questionnaire.西班牙语版父母赋权在新生儿重症监护病房(EMPATHIC-N)问卷的适应性和验证。
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2023 Aug;99(2):82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
7
Is Parental Presence in the Ambulance Associated With Parental Satisfaction During Emergency Pediatric Intensive Care Retrieval? A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.家长在救护车中陪伴是否与儿科重症监护室急救转运期间的家长满意度相关?一项横断面问卷调查研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;23(9):708-716. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002995. Epub 2022 May 27.
8
Perceptions of parents on satisfaction with care in the pediatric intensive care unit: the EMPATHIC study.父母对儿科重症监护病房护理满意度的看法:共情研究
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1082-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1491-7. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
9
The shortened EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care 30 questionnaire adequately measured parent satisfaction in pediatric intensive care units.缩短版的重症监护 30 项父母赋权量表充分测量了儿科重症监护病房父母的满意度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):1045-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.010. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
10
The Impact of Ethnic and Cultural Differences on Parental Satisfaction in the PICU.种族和文化差异对儿科重症监护病房中家长满意度的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;18(4):e167-e175. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001095.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Satisfaction in Ophthalmology: The Impact of Remote Scribes.眼科患者满意度:远程抄写员的影响。
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2025 May 28:24741264251340104. doi: 10.1177/24741264251340104.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-Evolutions of Pediatric and Adult Critical Care.儿科与成人重症监护的共同发展
Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):188-200. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004803.
2
Brazilian Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care 30 (EMPATHIC-30) Questionnaire to Measure Parental Satisfaction in PICUs.巴西文翻译、跨文化调适、有效性和可靠性的父母赋权在重症监护室 30 (EMPATHIC-30)问卷来衡量儿科重症监护病房的父母满意度。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):e339-e348. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002594.
3
The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method.净推荐值(NPS)在门诊过敏与肺病诊所的应用:对基于平板电脑工具与传统调查方法的创新性研究。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2020 May 19;11:137-142. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S248431. eCollection 2020.
4
Criteria for Critical Care Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance.危重症婴幼儿标准:PICU 收治、出院和分诊实施声明和分级护理指南。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):847-887. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001963.
5
Measuring the patient experience in community mental health services for older people: A study of the Net Promoter Score using the Friends and Family Test in England.测量老年人社区心理健康服务中的患者体验:使用英格兰的“朋友和家人测试”对净推荐值的研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;34(1):31-37. doi: 10.1002/gps.4978. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics.性健康和生殖健康诊所中客户体验洞察的净推荐值(NPS)。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Oct 4;6(3):413-424. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00068. Print 2018 Oct 3.
7
NPS and Online WOM: Investigating the Relationship Between Customers' Promoter Scores and eWOM Behavior.净推荐值与在线口碑:探究顾客推荐分数与电子口碑行为之间的关系。
J Serv Res. 2017 Aug;20(3):322-334. doi: 10.1177/1094670517696965. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
Empowering Parents of Australian Infants and Children in Hospital: Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the EMpowerment of PArents in The Intensive Care-30-AUS Questionnaire.赋能澳大利亚住院婴儿和儿童的父母:EMpowerment of PArents in The Intensive care-30-AUS 问卷的翻译、文化调适和验证。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;18(11):e506-e513. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001309.
9
Measuring quality of pediatric care: where we've been and where we're going.衡量儿科护理质量:我们的过去与未来。
Pediatrics. 2015 Apr;135(4):748-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3082. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
10
The Net Promoter Score--an asset to patient experience surveys?净推荐值——患者体验调查的一项资产?
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3099-109. doi: 10.1111/hex.12297. Epub 2014 Oct 27.