Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):1794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28164-4.
Assessment of burn extent and depth are critical and require very specialized diagnosis. Automated image-based algorithms could assist in performing wound detection and classification. We aimed to develop two deep-learning algorithms that respectively identify burns, and classify whether they require surgery. An additional aim assessed the performances in different Fitzpatrick skin types. Annotated burn (n = 1105) and background (n = 536) images were collected. Using a commercially available platform for deep learning algorithms, two models were trained and validated on 70% of the images and tested on the remaining 30%. Accuracy was measured for each image using the percentage of wound area correctly identified and F1 scores for the wound identifier; and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity for the wound classifier. The wound identifier algorithm detected an average of 87.2% of the wound areas accurately in the test set. For the wound classifier algorithm, the AUC was 0.885. The wound identifier algorithm was more accurate in patients with darker skin types; the wound classifier was more accurate in patients with lighter skin types. To conclude, image-based algorithms can support the assessment of acute burns with relatively good accuracy although larger and different datasets are needed.
烧伤程度和深度的评估至关重要,需要非常专业的诊断。基于图像的自动算法可以帮助进行伤口检测和分类。我们旨在开发两种深度学习算法,分别识别烧伤,并分类是否需要手术。另一个目的是评估在不同 Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型中的表现。收集了标注的烧伤(n=1105)和背景(n=536)图像。使用商业上可用的深度学习算法平台,在 70%的图像上训练和验证了两个模型,并在其余 30%的图像上进行了测试。使用正确识别的伤口面积百分比和伤口识别器的 F1 分数以及接收器操作特性(ROC)曲线下的面积(AUC)、灵敏度和特异性来测量每个图像的准确性。伤口识别器算法在测试集中平均准确地检测到 87.2%的伤口区域。对于伤口分类器算法,AUC 为 0.885。在皮肤较深的患者中,伤口识别器算法更准确;在皮肤较浅的患者中,伤口分类器算法更准确。总之,基于图像的算法可以支持急性烧伤的评估,具有相对较高的准确性,但需要更大和不同的数据集。