Am J Epidemiol. 2023 May 5;192(5):790-799. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad021.
Epidemiologists face a unique challenge in measuring risk relationships involving time-varying exposures in early pregnancy. Each week in early pregnancy is distinct in its contribution to fetal development, and this period is commonly characterized by shifts in maternal behavior and, consequently, exposures. In this simulation study, we used alcohol as an example of an exposure that often changes during early pregnancy and miscarriage as an outcome affected by early exposures. Data on alcohol consumption patterns from more than 5,000 women in the Right From the Start cohort study (United States, 2000-2012) informed measures of the prevalence of alcohol exposure, the distribution of gestational age at cessation of alcohol use, and the likelihood of miscarriage by week of gestation. We then compared the bias and precision of effect estimates and statistical power from 5 different modeling approaches in distinct simulated relationships. We demonstrate how the accuracy and precision of effect estimates depended on alignment between model assumptions and the underlying simulated relationship. Approaches that incorporated data about patterns of exposure were more powerful and less biased than simpler models when risk depended on timing or duration of exposure. To uncover risk relationships in early pregnancy, it is critical to carefully define the role of exposure timing in the underlying causal hypothesis.
流行病学家在衡量涉及妊娠早期时变暴露的风险关系时面临着独特的挑战。妊娠早期的每一周都有其独特的贡献,这段时间通常以母亲行为的转变为特征,从而导致暴露的变化。在这项模拟研究中,我们以酒精为例,说明了一种在妊娠早期经常变化的暴露,以及一种受早期暴露影响的流产结局。来自美国(2000-2012 年)Right From the Start 队列研究的 5000 多名女性的酒精消费模式数据为衡量酒精暴露的流行率、停止使用酒精的孕龄分布以及妊娠周的流产可能性提供了信息。然后,我们比较了 5 种不同建模方法在不同模拟关系中的效应估计值的偏倚和精度以及统计功效。我们展示了效应估计值的准确性和精度如何取决于模型假设与潜在模拟关系的一致性。当风险取决于暴露的时间或持续时间时,纳入关于暴露模式数据的方法比简单模型更有力且偏差更小。为了揭示妊娠早期的风险关系,必须仔细定义暴露时间在潜在因果假设中的作用。