• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中文精神科实践中,重叠和忽视 DSM 人格障碍之间的妥协解决方案。

A compromise solution between overlapping and overlooking DSM personality disorders in Chinese psychiatric practice.

机构信息

Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 600 South Wanping Road, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.

Department of Psychiatry, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200021, China.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1444-3. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-017-1444-3
PMID:28956087
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the overlaps between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) Personality Disorders (PDs) in a high-risk clinical population and to explore a transitional model for implementing DSM-5 PDs.

METHOD

A sample population of 982 outpatients with at least one diagnosed PD was selected from 3,075 outpatients of the Shanghai Mental Health Center. The diagnostic process comprised of a personality diagnostic questionnaire and a structured clinical interview.

RESULTS

685 (22.3%) patients were diagnosed with at least one of six PDs (antisocial, avoidant, borderline, narcissistic, obsessive-compulsive, and schizotypal) under the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders proposed in Section III of the DSM-5. Nearly 20.3% of the subjects with PD met criteria for at least two PDs (of the 685 PD patients/6 PD model). Cluster and principal component analyses suggest a transitional model for the 7 specific PD categories (among the 722 PD patients, the overlapping rate was 24.1%) will be more appropriate for PD diagnosis in China.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the simplified PD categories in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders will reduce the overlaps in PD diagnoses in Chinese psychiatric practice, and should be preferred over the DSM-5 PD diagnostic system.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察高危临床人群中诊断与统计手册第 5 版(DSM-5)人格障碍(PD)之间的重叠,并探索实施 DSM-5 PD 的过渡模式。

方法

从上海精神卫生中心的 3075 名门诊患者中,选择了至少有一种已诊断 PD 的 982 名门诊患者作为样本人群。诊断过程包括人格诊断问卷和结构化临床访谈。

结果

根据 DSM-5 第三部分提出的替代 DSM-5 人格障碍模型,685 名(22.3%)患者被诊断为至少有一种六种 PD(反社会、回避、边缘、自恋、强迫和分裂型)。近 20.3%的 PD 患者符合至少两种 PD 的标准(685 名 PD 患者中有 6 种)。聚类和主成分分析表明,对于中国的 PD 诊断,7 种特定 PD 类别(在 722 名 PD 患者中,重叠率为 24.1%)的过渡模型将更为合适。

结论

在人格障碍的替代 DSM-5 模型中使用简化的 PD 类别将减少中国精神科实践中 PD 诊断的重叠,并应优先考虑 DSM-5 PD 诊断系统。

相似文献

1
A compromise solution between overlapping and overlooking DSM personality disorders in Chinese psychiatric practice.在中文精神科实践中,重叠和忽视 DSM 人格障碍之间的妥协解决方案。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1444-3. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
2
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
3
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
4
Prevalence of personality disorders using two diagnostic systems in psychiatric outpatients in Shanghai, China: a comparison of uni-axial and multi-axial formulation.采用两种诊断系统在中国上海精神科门诊患者中人格障碍的患病率:单一轴和多轴表述的比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;47(9):1409-17. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0445-x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
5
Co-morbidity of personality disorder in schizophrenia among psychiatric outpatients in China: data from epidemiologic survey in a clinical population.中国精神科门诊患者中精神分裂症伴发人格障碍的情况:来自临床人群的流行病学调查数据
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 8;16:224. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0920-8.
6
Frequency of narcissistic personality disorder in a counseling center population in China.中国咨询中心人群中自恋型人格障碍的频率。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2185-5.
7
Which DSM-IV personality disorders are most strongly associated with indices of psychosocial morbidity in psychiatric outpatients?在精神科门诊患者中,哪些 DSM-IV 人格障碍与心理社会发病率的指标关联最强?
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;53(7):940-5. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
8
The relationship between anxiety disorders and dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: A co-twin control study.焦虑症与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍维度表征之间的关系:一项双胞胎对照研究。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
9
Disentangling depressive personality disorder from avoidant, borderline, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.区分抑郁型人格障碍与回避型、边缘型和强迫型人格障碍。
Compr Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;47(4):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.09.002. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
10
[An exploratory study of a personality disorders questionnaire].[一项人格障碍问卷的探索性研究]
Encephale. 2008 Oct;34(5):517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related differences in borderline personality disorder traits and childhood maltreatment: a cross-sectional study.边缘型人格障碍特质与童年期虐待的年龄相关差异:一项横断面研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 22;16:1454328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1454328. eCollection 2025.
2
Distribution of self-reported borderline personality disorder traits symptoms in a large-scale clinical population.大规模临床人群中自我报告的边缘性人格障碍特质症状分布情况。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 25;15:1424966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1424966. eCollection 2024.
3
Sex differences in personality disorders in a Chinese clinical population.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening schizotypal personality disorder for detection of clinical high risk of psychosis in Chinese mental health services.中文精神卫生服务中筛查精神分裂型人格障碍以发现精神病临床高危风险。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Aug 30;228(3):664-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.04.049. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
2
The alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍替代模型
World Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;14(2):234-6. doi: 10.1002/wps.20232.
3
Culture and personality disorder: from a fragmented literature to a contextually grounded alternative.
中国临床人群中人格障碍的性别差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 23;13:1006740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1006740. eCollection 2022.
4
Prevalence of Comorbid Personality Disorder in Psychotic and Non-psychotic Disorders.精神病性障碍和非精神病性障碍中共病性人格障碍的患病率。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 24;12:800047. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.800047. eCollection 2021.
5
Frequency of narcissistic personality disorder in a counseling center population in China.中国咨询中心人群中自恋型人格障碍的频率。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2185-5.
文化与人格障碍:从零散的文献到基于情境的替代观点
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;28(1):40-5. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000120.
4
The need to establish diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder in China.在中国建立边缘型人格障碍诊断标准的必要性。
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;24(4):231-2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2012.04.006.
5
Personality disorders in the DSM-5: current status, lessons learned, and future challenges. Introduction.DSM-5 中的人格障碍:现状、经验教训和未来挑战。引言。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):341. doi: 10.1037/per0000051.
6
Stability and change in personality disorders.人格障碍的稳定性和变化。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:499-528. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185637. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
7
Does the diagnosis of multiple Axis II disorders have clinical significance?多重轴II障碍的诊断有临床意义吗?
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;24(3):195-201.
8
Subtypes, dimensions, levels, and mental states in narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder.自恋及自恋型人格障碍中的亚型、维度、水平和心理状态。
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Aug;68(8):886-97. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21893. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
9
Narcissistic pathology as core personality dysfunction: comparing the DSM-IV and the DSM-5 proposal for narcissistic personality disorder.自恋型人格障碍的核心人格障碍:比较 DSM-IV 和 DSM-5 自恋型人格障碍提案。
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Aug;68(8):908-21. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21895. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
10
Prevalence of personality disorders using two diagnostic systems in psychiatric outpatients in Shanghai, China: a comparison of uni-axial and multi-axial formulation.采用两种诊断系统在中国上海精神科门诊患者中人格障碍的患病率:单一轴和多轴表述的比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;47(9):1409-17. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0445-x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.