Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物使用障碍治疗药物的预先授权限制:2005 年至 2019 年各州法律的趋势。

Prior authorization restrictions on medications for opioid use disorder: trends in state laws from 2005 to 2019.

机构信息

School of Global Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine (Secondary Joint Appointment), University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):514-520. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2171107.

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) - including methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone - are the most effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). Historically, insurers have required prior authorization for MOUD, but prior authorization is often reported as a key barrier to MOUD prescribing. Some states have passed laws prohibiting MOUD prior authorization requirements. We sought to identify the frequency of MOUD prior authorization prohibitions in state laws and to categorize types of prohibitions.

METHODS

We searched for regulations and statutes present in all U.S. states and Washington DC between 2005 and 2019 using MOUD-related terms in Westlaw legal software. In qualitative software, we coded laws discussing MOUD prior authorization using template analysis - a mixed deductive/inductive approach. Finally, we used coded laws to identify frequencies of states with prior authorization prohibitions, including changes over time.

RESULTS

No states had laws prohibiting MOUD prior authorization between 2005 and 2015, with the first prohibition appearing in 2016. By 2019, fifteen states had MOUD prior authorization prohibitions. States varied significantly in their approach to prohibiting MOUD prior authorization. In 2019, it was more common for states to have MOUD prior authorization prohibitions applying to all insurers ( = 10 states) than to only Medicaid ( = 7 states) or only non-Medicaid insurers ( = 1 state). In 2019, general prior authorization prohibitions ( = 10 states) were more common than prohibitions only applicable to medications on the formulary, prohibitions only applicable to medications on the preferred drug list, prohibitions only applicable during the first 5 days of treatment, and prohibitions only applicable during the first 30 days of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of states with an MOUD prior authorization law prohibition increased in recent years. Such laws could help expand access to life-saving OUD treatments by making it easier for clinicians to prescribe MOUD.KEY MESSAGESNo states had MOUD prior authorization prohibitions between 2005 and 2015 in state statutes or regulations, and only one state had such a prohibition in 2016.By 2019, fifteen states had an MOUD prior authorization prohibition law.States varied significantly in their approach to prohibiting MOUD prior authorization, including with respect to the insurer type, duration of the prohibition, and applicable medication.

摘要

研究目的

阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUDs)的药物治疗——包括美沙酮、丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮——是治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)最有效的方法。历史上,保险公司对 MOUD 有事先授权的要求,但事先授权常被报告为 MOUD 处方的主要障碍。一些州已经通过法律禁止 MOUD 事先授权的要求。我们试图确定州法律中 MOUD 事先授权禁令的频率,并对禁令类型进行分类。

方法

我们在 Westlaw 法律软件中使用与 MOUD 相关的术语,搜索 2005 年至 2019 年期间所有美国州和华盛顿特区的法规和法规。在定性软件中,我们使用模板分析对讨论 MOUD 事先授权的法律进行编码——一种混合演绎/归纳的方法。最后,我们使用编码法律来确定具有事先授权禁令的州的频率,包括随时间的变化。

结果

2005 年至 2015 年间,没有州有禁止 MOUD 事先授权的法律,第一个禁令出现在 2016 年。到 2019 年,已有 15 个州禁止 MOUD 事先授权。各州在禁止 MOUD 事先授权的方法上存在显著差异。2019 年,更常见的情况是,所有保险公司( = 10 个州)都有 MOUD 事先授权禁令,而不是仅适用于医疗补助( = 7 个州)或仅适用于非医疗补助保险公司( = 1 个州)。2019 年,更常见的是一般的事先授权禁令( = 10 个州),而不是仅适用于处方药物的禁令,仅适用于首选药物清单上的药物的禁令,仅适用于治疗前 5 天的药物的禁令,以及仅适用于治疗前 30 天的药物的禁令。

结论

近年来,有 MOUD 事先授权法律禁令的州的数量有所增加。此类法律可以通过使临床医生更容易开出 MOUD 来帮助扩大挽救生命的 OUD 治疗的可及性。

关键信息

2005 年至 2015 年,州法规或法规中没有 MOUD 事先授权的禁令,2016 年只有一个州有这样的禁令。到 2019 年,已有 15 个州有 MOUD 事先授权禁令。各州在禁止 MOUD 事先授权的方法上存在显著差异,包括保险公司类型、禁令持续时间和适用药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff94/9897778/aa7506d4a0e1/IANN_A_2171107_F0001_C.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验