Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BMJ. 2023 Feb 1;380:e072415. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072415.
To provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of antidepressants for pain according to condition.
Overview of systematic reviews.
PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 20 June 2022.
Systematic reviews comparing any antidepressant with placebo for any pain condition in adults.
Two reviewers independently extracted data. The main outcome measure was pain; for headache disorders it was frequency of headaches. Continuous pain outcomes were converted into a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain) and were presented as mean differences (95% confidence intervals). Dichotomous outcomes were presented as risk ratios (95% confidence intervals). Data were extracted from the time point closest to the end of treatment. When end of treatment was too variable across trials in a review, data were extracted from the outcome or time point with the largest number of trials and participants. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability (withdrawals because of adverse events). Findings were classified from each comparison as efficacious, not efficacious, or inconclusive. Certainty of evidence was assessed with the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation framework.
26 reviews (156 unique trials and >25 000 participants) were included. These reviews reported on the efficacy of eight antidepressant classes covering 22 pain conditions (42 distinct comparisons). No review provided high certainty evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants for pain for any condition. 11 comparisons (nine conditions) were found where antidepressants were efficacious, four with moderate certainty evidence: serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for back pain (mean difference -5.3, 95% confidence interval -7.3 to -3.3), postoperative pain (-7.3, -12.9 to -1.7), neuropathic pain (-6.8, -8.7 to -4.8), and fibromyalgia (risk ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.6). For the other 31 comparisons, antidepressants were either not efficacious (five comparisons) or the evidence was inconclusive (26 comparisons).
Evidence of efficacy of antidepressants was found in 11 of the 42 comparisons included in this overview of systematic reviews-seven of the 11 comparisons investigated the efficacy of SNRIs. For the other 31 comparisons, antidepressants were either inefficacious or evidence on efficacy was inconclusive. The findings suggest that a more nuanced approach is needed when prescribing antidepressants for pain conditions.
PROSPERO CRD42022311073.
根据病情全面概述抗抑郁药治疗疼痛的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
系统评价概述。
从建库至 2022 年 6 月 20 日,PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。
比较任何抗抑郁药与安慰剂治疗成人任何疼痛疾病的系统评价。
两名审查员独立提取数据。主要结局指标是疼痛;对于头痛疾病,是头痛发作的频率。连续疼痛结局转换为 0(无疼痛)至 100(最严重疼痛)的量表,并呈现为均数差异(95%置信区间)。二项结局呈现为风险比(95%置信区间)。数据从最接近治疗结束的时间点提取。当一个综述中的试验结束时间在各试验之间变化太大时,数据从试验数量和参与者最多的结局或时间点提取。次要结局是安全性和耐受性(因不良事件而停药)。从每项比较中判断为有效、无效或不确定。使用推荐评估、制定和评估框架评估证据的确定性。
纳入 26 项综述(156 项独特试验和超过 25000 名参与者)。这些综述报告了八种抗抑郁药类别的疗效,涵盖 22 种疼痛疾病(42 种不同的比较)。没有综述为任何条件下抗抑郁药治疗疼痛的疗效提供高确定性证据。发现 11 项比较(9 种疾病)抗抑郁药有效,其中 4 项具有中度确定性证据:血清素-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)治疗背痛(平均差异-5.3,95%置信区间-7.3 至-3.3)、术后疼痛(-7.3,-12.9 至-1.7)、神经病理性疼痛(-6.8,-8.7 至-4.8)和纤维肌痛(风险比 1.4,95%置信区间 1.3 至 1.6)。对于其他 31 项比较,抗抑郁药要么无效(5 项比较),要么疗效证据不确定(26 项比较)。
在本次系统评价概述中纳入的 42 项比较中的 11 项中发现了抗抑郁药疗效的证据——其中 7 项比较研究了 SNRIs 的疗效。对于其他 31 项比较,抗抑郁药要么无效,要么疗效证据不确定。研究结果表明,在为疼痛疾病开具抗抑郁药时,需要采取更细致的方法。
PROSPERO CRD42022311073。