Piccinin Claire, Basch Ethan, Bhatnagar Vishal, Calvert Melanie, Campbell Alicyn, Cella David, Cleeland Charles S, Coens Corneel, Darlington Anne-Sophie, Dueck Amylou C, Groenvold Mogens, Herold Ralf, King-Kallimanis Bellinda L, Kluetz Paul G, Kuliś Dagmara, O'Connor Daniel, Oliver Kathy, Pe Madeline, Reeve Bryce B, Reijneveld Jaap C, Wang Xin Shelley, Bottomley Andrew
Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Feb;24(2):e86-e95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00654-4.
The use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement in oncology allows for the customisation of PRO assessment to measure key health-related quality of life concepts of relevance to the target population and intervention. However, no high-level recommendations exist to guide users on the design and implementation of these customised PRO measures (item lists) across different PRO measurement systems. To address this issue, a working group was set up, including international stakeholders (academic, independent, industry, health technology assessment, regulatory, and patient advocacy), with the goal of creating recommendations for the use of item libraries in oncology trials. A scoping review was carried out to identify relevant publications and highlight any gaps. Stakeholders commented on the available guidance for each research question, proposed recommendations on how to address gaps in the literature, and came to an agreement using discussion-based methods. Nine primary research questions were identified that formed the scope and structure of the recommendations on how to select items and implement item lists created from item libraries. These recommendations address methods to drive item selection, plan the structure and analysis of item lists, and facilitate their use in conjunction with other measures. The findings resulted in high-level, instrument-agnostic recommendations on the use of item-library-derived item lists in oncology trials.
在肿瘤学中,使用项目库进行患者报告结局(PRO)测量能够定制PRO评估,以衡量与目标人群及干预措施相关的关键健康相关生活质量概念。然而,目前尚无高级别建议来指导用户在不同的PRO测量系统中设计和实施这些定制的PRO测量指标(项目列表)。为解决这一问题,成立了一个工作组,成员包括国际利益相关者(学术界、独立机构、行业、卫生技术评估机构、监管机构和患者权益倡导组织),目标是为在肿瘤学试验中使用项目库制定建议。开展了一项范围综述以识别相关出版物并突出任何差距。利益相关者对每个研究问题的现有指南发表评论,就如何弥补文献中的差距提出建议,并通过基于讨论的方法达成共识。确定了九个主要研究问题,这些问题构成了关于如何选择项目以及实施从项目库创建的项目列表的建议的范围和结构。这些建议涉及推动项目选择的方法、规划项目列表的结构和分析,以及促进其与其他测量指标结合使用。研究结果产生了关于在肿瘤学试验中使用源自项目库的项目列表的高级别、与仪器无关的建议。