• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整形外科中的众包:系统评价及报告建议

Crowdsourcing in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review with Reporting Recommendations.

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jul 1;152(1):166e-187e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010232. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010232
PMID:36727828
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Crowdsourcing uses online platforms to collect large data from laypersons and has been increasingly used over the past 5 years to answer questions about aesthetic and functional outcomes following plastic and reconstructive surgery. This systematic review evaluates crowdsourcing articles in plastic and reconstructive surgery based on study topic, participants, and effect size in the hopes of describing best practices.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy was developed with a licensed librarian and attending plastic surgeon to query all articles using crowdsourcing in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Covidence systematic review manager was used by two independent reviewers to import articles, screen abstracts, evaluate full texts, and extract data.

RESULTS

A search run on October 8, 2021, yielded 168 studies, of which 45 were ultimately included. Craniofacial surgery and aesthetic surgery collectively constituted over half of studies. Participants in plastic surgery crowdsourcing studies are more commonly from the United States, female, straight, 25 to 35 years old; have completed college; and earn $20,000 to $50,000 per year. Studies typically assessed aesthetic perceptions, cost approximately $350, ran a median of 9 days, included approximately 60 unique survey items, and included approximately 40 unique human images.

CONCLUSIONS

Crowdsourcing is a relatively new, low-cost method of garnering high-volume data from laypersons that may further our understanding of public perception in plastic and reconstructive surgery. As with other nascent fields, there is significant variability in number of subjects used, subject compensation, and methodology, indicating an opportunity for quality improvement.

摘要

背景

众包利用在线平台从非专业人士那里收集大量数据,在过去 5 年中越来越多地被用于回答有关整形和重建手术后美学和功能结果的问题。本系统评价根据研究主题、参与者和整形和重建手术众包研究中的效应量评估众包文章,以期描述最佳实践。

方法

与持牌图书馆员和主治整形外科医生合作制定了系统搜索策略,以查询所有使用众包进行整形和重建手术的文章。两名独立审查员使用 Covidence 系统评价经理导入文章、筛选摘要、评估全文和提取数据。

结果

2021 年 10 月 8 日进行的搜索产生了 168 项研究,其中最终纳入了 45 项研究。颅面外科和美容外科的研究合计占一半以上。整形手术众包研究的参与者通常来自美国、女性、异性恋、25 至 35 岁、完成大学学业、年收入 20,000 至 50,000 美元。研究通常评估美学感知,费用约为 350 美元,平均运行 9 天,包括约 60 个独特的调查项目,包括约 40 个独特的人体图像。

结论

众包是一种相对较新的、低成本的方法,可以从非专业人士那里获取大量数据,从而进一步了解公众对整形和重建手术的看法。与其他新兴领域一样,使用的受试者数量、受试者补偿和方法存在很大差异,这表明有改进质量的机会。

相似文献

1
Crowdsourcing in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review with Reporting Recommendations.整形外科中的众包:系统评价及报告建议
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jul 1;152(1):166e-187e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010232. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
2
Applied Online Crowdsourcing in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes in Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Techniques.在线众包在整形与重建外科中的应用:单侧唇裂修复技术美学效果的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 May;84(5S Suppl 4):S307-S310. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002389.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
In the Age of Social Media, How Does the Public Choose a Plastic Surgeon? A Crowdsourcing Analysis of Major Deciding Factors.在社交媒体时代,公众如何选择整形外科医生?主要决策因素的众包分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jan 1;153(1):194e-203e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010571. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
5
What Do Our Patients Truly Want? Conjoint Analysis of an Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Practice Using Internet Crowdsourcing.我们的患者真正想要什么?利用互联网众包对美容整形手术实践进行联合分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jan;37(1):105-118. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw143. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
6
Commentary on: What Do Our Patients Truly Want? Conjoint Analysis of an Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Practice Using Internet Crowdsourcing.评论:我们的患者真正想要什么?利用互联网众包对美容整形手术实践进行联合分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jan;37(1):119-121. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw205. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
Program Director Survey of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Fellowships in the United States: Current State-of-the-Art.美国美容整形外科学术项目主任调查:当前的技术水平
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Nov;85(5):464-467. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002164.
8
Crowdsourcing as a Novel Method to Evaluate Aesthetic Outcomes of Treatment for Unilateral Cleft Lip.众包作为评估单侧唇裂治疗美学效果的一种新方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):864-874. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002545.
9
Perceptions and misconceptions of the plastic and reconstructive surgeon.整形与重建外科医生的认知与误解
Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Apr;38(4):426-30. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199704000-00020.
10
The Ethical Debate Over Fair Treatment of Workers for Crowdsourcing Studies in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.整形与重建外科众包研究中工人公平待遇的伦理辩论
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jan 1;151(1):188e-189e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009746. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Outcomes of Infant Ear Molding: A 10-year Single-Surgeon Experience.婴儿耳部塑形的长期结果:一位外科医生的10年经验
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Apr 15;13(4):e6673. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006673. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Crowdsourced Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes of Traditional Transverse Versus Skin-Reducing Mastectomy Incision Patterns Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.基于植入物的乳房重建术后传统横向与皮肤缩减乳房切除术切口模式美学效果的众包比较。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 2;17(3):e79924. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79924. eCollection 2025 Mar.