Dobler Liana, Hamza Blend, Attin Thomas, Wegehaupt Florian J
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2023 Feb 2;21:41-48. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b3858625.
To investigate the absolute wear caused by toothpastes with highly discrepant REA (Relative Enamel Abrasivity) and RDA (Relative Dentin Abrasivity) values on both enamel and dentin: Candida Peppermint (CP; REA: 1; RDA: 42), Colgate Total Original (CTO; REA: 4; RDA: 100), Signal White System (SWS; REA: 8; RDA: 143), and Candida White Diamond (CWD; REA 244; RDA: 12).
Eighty (80) bovine enamel samples and 80 dentin samples were divided into four groups each (n = 20) and investigated after a 6-h brushing procedure (21,600 cycles, 60 cycles/min, load of 2.5 N) with the four toothpastes. The abrasive enamel and dentin wear were registered using a contact profilometer. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of the abrasive enamel and dentin wear were calculated for each group. Pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank exact test, and the p-value was adjusted according to Holm (statistical significance set at 0.05).
CWD led to the highest abrasive enamel wear (9.86 μm [5.77]). CTO caused the highest abrasive dentin wear (166.70 μm [69.90]), being statistically significantly higher than the wear for CP (54.20 μm [24.00]) and CWD (17.00 μm [7.80]) (p = 0.00001). The abrasive dentin wear for CWD was statistically significantly lower in comparison to all other groups (p = 0.00001).
Toothpastes with highly discrepant REA and RDA values presented statistically significantly different absolute wear on enamel and dentin. REA and RDA values should both be declared for every toothpaste.
研究相对牙釉质磨损率(REA)和相对牙本质磨损率(RDA)值差异极大的牙膏对牙釉质和牙本质造成的绝对磨损情况:康齿家薄荷味牙膏(CP;REA:1;RDA:42)、高露洁全效原味牙膏(CTO;REA:4;RDA:100)、舒适达美白系统牙膏(SWS;REA:8;RDA:143)和康齿家白钻牙膏(CWD;REA:244;RDA:12)。
80个牛牙釉质样本和80个牙本质样本被分成四组,每组20个,使用这四种牙膏进行6小时刷牙程序(21600次循环,60次/分钟,2.5牛的负载)后进行研究。使用接触式轮廓仪记录牙釉质和牙本质的磨蚀磨损情况。计算每组牙釉质和牙本质磨蚀磨损的中位数和四分位间距(IQR)。使用Wilcoxon符号秩精确检验进行两两比较,并根据霍尔姆方法调整p值(设定统计学显著性为0.05)。
CWD导致最高的牙釉质磨蚀磨损(9.86微米[5.77])。CTO导致最高的牙本质磨蚀磨损(166.70微米[69.90]),在统计学上显著高于CP(54.20微米[24.00])和CWD(17.00微米[7.80])的磨损(p = 0.00001)。与所有其他组相比,CWD的牙本质磨蚀磨损在统计学上显著更低(p = 0.00001)。
REA和RDA值差异极大的牙膏在牙釉质和牙本质上呈现出统计学上显著不同的绝对磨损。每种牙膏都应同时标明REA和RDA值。