Wiktorski Cody A, Michelogiannakis Dimitrios, Rossouw P Emile, Javed Fawad
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14620, USA.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Mar 1;12(3):58. doi: 10.3390/dj12030058.
The objective was to systematically review studies that evaluated the effect of charcoal-based dentifrices (CbDs) and conventional whitening toothpastes (CWTs) on the color stability (CS) and/or surface roughness (SR) of composite resin (CR). The question we focused on was "Do CbD and CWT affect the CS and/or SR of CR?" Indexed databases were searched without language and time restrictions up to and including May 2023 using different keywords. Original experimental studies were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies. Ten in vitro studies performed on CR were included. The number of CR samples assessed ranged between 18 and 200. In one study, CbDs altered the CS and SR of CR, whereas another study showed no difference in changes in the SR and CS of CR when CbDs were compared with CWTs. One study showed that compared with CWTs, CbDs caused changes in the CS of CR but changes in SR were similar between the two dentifrices. One study showed that CbDs and CWTs improved the overall color and enhanced the SR of CR. Three studies had a high RoB, five had a medium RoB, and two had a low RoB. Compared to CWTs, CbDs appeared to affect the CS of CR, but the SR of CR induced by both dentifrices remained consistent. Further well-designed and power-adjusted studies are needed.
目的是系统评价评估基于木炭的牙膏(CbD)和传统美白牙膏(CWT)对复合树脂(CR)颜色稳定性(CS)和/或表面粗糙度(SR)影响的研究。我们关注的问题是“CbD和CWT是否会影响CR的CS和/或SR?” 使用不同关键词检索截至2023年5月(含)的索引数据库,无语言和时间限制。纳入原创性实验研究。使用体外研究质量评估工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。纳入了10项对CR进行的体外研究。评估的CR样本数量在18至200之间。一项研究中,CbD改变了CR的CS和SR,而另一项研究表明,将CbD与CWT比较时,CR的SR和CS变化无差异。一项研究表明,与CWT相比,CbD导致CR的CS发生变化,但两种牙膏之间SR的变化相似。一项研究表明,CbD和CWT改善了整体颜色并提高了CR的SR。三项研究的RoB高,五项中等,两项低。与CWT相比,CbD似乎会影响CR的CS,但两种牙膏引起的CR的SR保持一致。需要进一步设计良好且进行功效调整的研究。