Suppr超能文献

单纯减压手术与减压加融合手术治疗症状性腰椎管狭窄症的比较:一项瑞士前瞻性多中心队列研究,随访 3 年。

Decompression Surgery Alone Versus Decompression Plus Fusion in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Swiss Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study With 3 Years of Follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.

Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Sep 15;42(18):E1077-E1086. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002068.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the added effect of surgical fusion as compared to decompression surgery alone in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis patients with spondylolisthesis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis patients with spondylolisthesis remains controversial.

METHODS

Patients of the Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study with confirmed DLSS and spondylolisthesis were enrolled in this study. The outcomes of this study were Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) symptoms (score range 1-5, best-worst) and function (1-4) over time, measured at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months follow-up. In order to quantify the effect of fusion surgery as compared to decompression alone and number of decompressed levels, we used mixed effects models and accounted for the repeated observations in main outcomes (SSM symptoms and SSM function) over time. In addition to individual patients' random effects, we also fitted random slopes for follow-up time points and compared these two approaches with Akaike's Information Criterion and the chi-square test. Confounders were adjusted with fixed effects for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale musculoskeletal disorders, and duration of symptoms.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one patients undergoing decompression surgery alone (n = 85) or decompression with fusion surgery (n = 46) were included in this study. In the multiple mixed effects model the adjusted effect of fusion compared with decompression alone surgery on SSM symptoms was 0.06 (95% confidence interval: -0.16-0.27) and -0.07 (95% confidence interval: -0.25-0.10) on SSM function, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among the patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis our study confirms that in the two groups, decompression alone and decompression with fusion, patients distinctively benefited from surgical treatment. When adjusted for confounders, fusion surgery was not associated with a more favorable outcome in both SSM scores as compared to decompression alone surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性、多中心队列研究的回顾性分析。

目的

评估与单纯减压手术相比,在伴有腰椎滑脱的症状性腰椎管狭窄症患者中,手术融合的附加效果。

背景资料概要

腰椎管狭窄伴腰椎滑脱患者的最佳手术治疗仍存在争议。

方法

本研究纳入了腰椎狭窄症研究中经证实存在退变性腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎滑脱的患者。本研究的结果是脊柱狭窄测量(SSM)症状(评分范围 1-5,最差-最佳)和功能(1-4)随时间的变化,在基线、6、12、24 和 36 个月随访时进行测量。为了量化融合手术与单纯减压手术以及减压水平数量的效果,我们使用混合效应模型,并考虑了主要结局(SSM 症状和 SSM 功能)随时间的重复观测。除了个体患者的随机效应外,我们还为随访时间点拟合了随机斜率,并通过赤池信息量准则和卡方检验比较了这两种方法。混杂因素通过年龄、性别、体重指数、糖尿病、累积疾病评分量表肌肉骨骼疾病以及症状持续时间的固定效应进行调整。

结果

本研究纳入了 131 例接受单纯减压手术(n=85)或减压联合融合手术(n=46)的患者。在多变量混合效应模型中,融合手术与单纯减压手术相比,SSM 症状的调整后效应为 0.06(95%置信区间:-0.16-0.27),SSM 功能为 0.07(95%置信区间:-0.25-0.10)。

结论

在伴有退变性腰椎管狭窄和腰椎滑脱的患者中,我们的研究证实,在单纯减压组和减压联合融合组中,患者均从手术治疗中明显获益。在调整混杂因素后,与单纯减压手术相比,融合手术在 SSM 评分方面并未带来更有利的结果。

证据等级

3。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验