• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用模糊层次分析法和贝叶斯网络模型对煤气化过程中多米诺效应的应急响应效果进行建模。

Modeling the effect of emergency response on domino effects in the coal gasification process by fuzzy hierarchical analysis and Bayesian network.

机构信息

College of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China.

College of Petrochemical Technology, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0279346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279346. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0279346
PMID:36730245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10045569/
Abstract

Emergency response has an important impact on the mitigation of the domino effects. However, consequence analysis of the domino effect often ignores emergency response due to its complexity and uncertainty. In this paper, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is adopted to evaluate the reliability of emergency response process. On this basis, using Bayesian Network (BN) model, the domino effect under the influence of emergency response is modeled. Based on the total duration of the above-mentioned emergency response process to determine the consequences of domino effect under the action of safety barriers. The application of the approach has been demonstrated by an illustrative case study. The results show that the probability of domino effect is reduced by an order of magnitude when active barriers, passive barriers and emergency response are considered together. This work can provide relevant basis for formulating safety protection measures in chemical process industry.

摘要

应急响应对缓解多米诺效应具有重要影响。然而,由于多米诺效应的复杂性和不确定性,其后果分析往往忽略了应急响应。本文采用模糊层次分析法(FAHP)来评估应急响应过程的可靠性。在此基础上,利用贝叶斯网络(BN)模型,对受应急响应影响的多米诺效应进行建模。基于上述应急响应过程的总持续时间,确定安全屏障作用下多米诺效应的后果。通过一个实例研究验证了该方法的应用。结果表明,当同时考虑主动防护、被动防护和应急响应时,多米诺效应的概率降低了一个数量级。这项工作可以为化工过程工业制定安全保护措施提供相关依据。

相似文献

1
Modeling the effect of emergency response on domino effects in the coal gasification process by fuzzy hierarchical analysis and Bayesian network.运用模糊层次分析法和贝叶斯网络模型对煤气化过程中多米诺效应的应急响应效果进行建模。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0279346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279346. eCollection 2023.
2
Fuzzy Bayesian estimation and consequence modeling of the domino effects of methanol storage tanks.甲醇储罐多米诺效应的模糊贝叶斯估计与后果建模。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2509-2519. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.2011656. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
3
Probabilistic risk analysis for coal mine gas overrun based on FAHP and BN: a case study.基于 FAHP 和 BN 的煤矿瓦斯超限概率风险分析:案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(19):28458-28468. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18474-3. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
4
Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment.双模态模糊层次分析法(BFAHP)在冠心病风险评估中的应用。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:204-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Fuzzy Bayesian Network-Bow-Tie Analysis of Gas Leakage during Biomass Gasification.生物质气化过程中气体泄漏的模糊贝叶斯网络-蝴蝶结分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 27;11(7):e0160045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160045. eCollection 2016.
6
Statistical analysis of domino chemical accidents.多米诺骨牌式化学事故的统计分析
J Hazard Mater. 2000 Jan 7;71(1-3):239-52. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00081-3.
7
Dynamic Human Error Assessment in Emergency Using Fuzzy Bayesian CREAM.基于模糊贝叶斯 CREAM 的急诊动态人为失误评估
J Res Health Sci. 2020 Feb 16;20(1):e00468. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2020.03.
8
Human reliability analysis of high-temperature molten metal operation based on fuzzy CREAM and Bayesian network.基于模糊CREAM和贝叶斯网络的高温熔融金属作业人员可靠性分析
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0254861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254861. eCollection 2021.
9
Risk management of domino effects considering dynamic consequence analysis.考虑动态后果分析的多米诺效应风险管理。
Risk Anal. 2014 Jun;34(6):1128-38. doi: 10.1111/risa.12158. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
10
Which Fire to Extinguish First? A Risk-Informed Approach to Emergency Response in Oil Terminals.先扑灭哪把火?油库应急响应的风险感知方法。
Risk Anal. 2018 Jul;38(7):1444-1454. doi: 10.1111/risa.12946. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of human and organizational factors that influence mining accidents based on Bayesian network.基于贝叶斯网络的影响矿山事故的人因与组织因素分析
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Dec;26(4):670-677. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1455411. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
2
Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires.积极情绪拓宽了注意力的范围以及思维行动指令系统。
Cogn Emot. 2005 May 1;19(3):313-332. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000238.
3
Industrial emergency planning modeling: a first step toward a robustness analysis tool.
工业应急规划建模:迈向稳健性分析工具的第一步。
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Sep 15;181(1-3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 May 11.
4
The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire.火灾引发多米诺效应中储存罐破坏概率的评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 Nov;41(6):1206-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
5
Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents.用于调查航运事故中人为失误的分析性人类因素分析系统(HFACS)
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 Jan;41(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
6
Preparing and responding to major accidents and disasters.重大事故和灾难的准备与应对。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2005 Jun;12(2):119-21. doi: 10.1080/17457300500102955.
7
ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance.ARAMIS项目:通过使用蝴蝶结图和评估安全屏障性能更明确地展示风险控制
J Hazard Mater. 2006 Mar 31;130(3):220-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010. Epub 2005 Aug 16.