Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin (METRIC-B), QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge.
Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):512-522. doi: 10.1177/09567976221140828. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
In April 2019, published its first issue in which all Research Articles received the Open Data badge. We used that issue to investigate the effectiveness of this badge, focusing on the adherence to its aim at : sharing both data and code to ensure reproducibility of results. Twelve researchers of varying experience levels attempted to reproduce the results of the empirical articles in the target issue (at least three researchers per article). We found that all 14 articles provided at least some data and six provided analysis code, but only one article was rated to be exactly reproducible, and three were rated as essentially reproducible with minor deviations. We suggest that researchers should be encouraged to adhere to the higher standard in force at . Moreover, a check of reproducibility during peer review may be preferable to the disclosure method of awarding badges.
2019 年 4 月, 发表了第一期杂志,其中所有研究文章都获得了开放数据徽章。我们利用该期杂志调查了这一徽章的有效性,重点关注其目的的实现情况,即:共享数据和代码,以确保结果的可重复性。12 名不同经验水平的研究人员试图重现目标杂志中实证文章的结果(每篇文章至少有 3 名研究人员)。我们发现,所有 14 篇文章都至少提供了一些数据,6 篇文章提供了分析代码,但只有一篇文章被评为完全可重现,三篇文章被评为基本可重现,只有轻微偏差。我们建议鼓励研究人员遵守 的更高标准。此外,在同行评审期间检查可重复性可能比授予徽章的披露方法更好。