Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Mar;102(3):246-256. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14518. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
Serous ovarian carcinomas constitute the largest group of epithelial ovarian cancer (60%-75%) and are further classified into high- and low-grade serous carcinoma. Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a relatively rare subtype (approximately 5% of serous carcinomas) and epidemiologic studies of large cohorts are scarce. With the present study we aimed to report trends in stage, primary treatment and relative survival of LGSC of the ovary in a large cohort of patients in an effort to identify opportunities to improve clinical practice and outcome of this relatively rare disease.
Patients diagnosed with LGSC between 2000 and 2019 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 855). Trends in FIGO stages and primary treatment were analyzed with the Cochran-Armitage trend test, and differences in and trends of 5-year relative survival were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression.
Over time, LGSC was increasingly diagnosed as stage III (39.9%-59.0%) and IV disease (5.7%-14.4%) and less often as stage I (34.6%-13.5%; p < 0.001). Primary debulking surgery was the most common strategy (76.2%), although interval debulking surgery was preferred more often over the years (10.6%-31.1%; p < 0.001). Following primary surgery, there was >1 cm residual disease in only 15/252 patients (6%), compared with 17/95 patients (17.9%) after interval surgery. Full cohort 5-year survival was 61% and survival after primary debulking surgery was superior to the outcome following interval debulking surgery (60% vs 34%). Survival following primary debulking surgery without macroscopic residual disease (73%) was better compared with ≤1 cm (47%) and >1 cm residual disease (22%). Survival following interval debulking surgery without macroscopic residual disease (51%) was significantly higher than after >1 cm residual disease (24%). Except FIGO stage II (85%-92%), survival did not change significantly over time.
Over the years, LGSC has been diagnosed as FIGO stage III and stage IV disease more often and interval debulking surgery has been increasingly preferred over primary debulking in these patients. Relative survival did not change over time (except for stage II) and worse survival outcomes after interval debulking surgery were observed. The results support the common recommendation to perform primary debulking surgery in patients eligible for primary surgery.
浆液性卵巢癌构成了上皮性卵巢癌(60%-75%)的最大群体,进一步分为高级别浆液性癌和低级别浆液性癌。低级别浆液性癌(LGSC)是一种相对罕见的亚型(约占浆液性癌的 5%),关于其的大型队列的流行病学研究很少。本研究旨在报告在一个大型患者队列中,LGSC 的分期、初始治疗和相对生存率的趋势,以寻找改善这种相对罕见疾病的临床实践和结果的机会。
从荷兰癌症登记处(n=855)中确定了 2000 年至 2019 年间诊断为 LGSC 的患者。使用 Cochran-Armitage 趋势检验分析 FIGO 分期和初始治疗的趋势,使用多变量泊松回归分析 5 年相对生存率的差异和趋势。
随着时间的推移,LGSC 被诊断为 III 期(39.9%-59.0%)和 IV 期疾病(5.7%-14.4%)的比例逐渐增加,而被诊断为 I 期疾病(34.6%-13.5%)的比例降低(p<0.001)。原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术是最常见的策略(76.2%),但近年来间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术的应用更为普遍(10.6%-31.1%;p<0.001)。在原发性手术后,仅有 15/252 例(6%)患者有>1cm 的残余疾病,而 95/95 例(17.9%)患者在间隔手术后有>1cm 的残余疾病。全队列 5 年生存率为 61%,原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术的生存率优于间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术(60% vs 34%)。原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术后无肉眼残留疾病(73%)的生存率优于残留疾病≤1cm(47%)和>1cm(22%)。间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术后无肉眼残留疾病(51%)的生存率显著高于残留疾病>1cm(24%)。除 II 期(85%-92%)外,生存率随时间变化不显著。
多年来,LGSC 被诊断为 III 期和 IV 期疾病的比例更高,并且在这些患者中,间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术越来越多地被优先于原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术。相对生存率没有随时间变化(除了 II 期),并且观察到间隔性肿瘤细胞减灭术后生存率更差。这些结果支持对有原发性手术适应证的患者进行原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术的常规建议。