University of Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Sarawak, Malaysia.
University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(5):413-424. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.123197.
Preoxygenation during endotracheal intubation is important to ensure the safety of the procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preoxygenation in the head-elevated position as compared to the supine position. The Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception of the study until 29 June 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and GRADE assessment of certainty of evidence were used. Seven RCTs (n = 508) were analysed, of which 6 were included in the meta-analysis (n = 227). Six studies were carried out in the operating theatre (OT), while one was performed in the critical care (ICU) setting. Compared to the supine position, the head-elevated position significantly increased the duration of the safe apnoea period (mean difference 61.99 s; 95% confidence interval 42.93-81.05 s; P < 0.00001; I2 = 30%; certainty of evidence = high). This improvement was seen in both the obese and non-obese population (I2 = 0%). No differences were seen between both groups with regard to recovery time after apnoea, arterial oxygen tension after preoxygenation, and the incidence of adverse events. In the ICU setting, no difference was found between groups for the incidence of hypoxaemia and the lowest oxygen saturation between induction and after intubation. This meta-analysis demonstrated that the head-elevated position significantly improved the efficacy of preoxygenation during elective intubation in the OT. Clinicians should consider the head-elevated position as a starting intubating position for all patients undergoing anaesthesia in view of its many benefits and the lack of proven adverse consequences. Protocol Registration: This systematic review was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD42019128962).
在气管插管期间进行预充氧对于确保手术安全非常重要。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估头高位预充氧与仰卧位相比的效果。我们系统地检索了 Medline、PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 CENTRAL 数据库,检索时间从研究开始到 2021 年 6 月 29 日。仅纳入随机对照试验(RCT)。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具和 GRADE 评估证据确定性。分析了 7 项 RCT(n = 508),其中 6 项纳入荟萃分析(n = 227)。6 项研究在手术室(OT)进行,1 项在重症监护病房(ICU)进行。与仰卧位相比,头高位显著延长了安全无通气期的持续时间(平均差异 61.99 秒;95%置信区间 42.93-81.05 秒;P < 0.00001;I2 = 30%;证据确定性为高)。这种改善在肥胖和非肥胖人群中均可见(I2 = 0%)。两组在无通气后恢复时间、预充氧后动脉氧分压和不良事件发生率方面无差异。在 ICU 环境中,两组在低氧血症发生率和诱导后与气管插管后之间的最低血氧饱和度方面无差异。本荟萃分析表明,在 OT 中,头高位显著提高了择期插管期间预充氧的效果。鉴于其众多益处且缺乏已证实的不良后果,临床医生应考虑将头高位作为所有接受麻醉的患者的起始插管位置。方案注册:本系统评价前瞻性地在 PROSPERO(CRD42019128962)中进行了注册。