Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, Department of Sociology and Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sci Adv. 2023 Feb 3;9(5):eadd9038. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add9038.
Uncertainty around age at death, or lifetime uncertainty, is a key public health indicator and a marker of inequality in survival. How does the extent of violence affect lifetime uncertainty? We address this question by quantifying the impact of violence on dispersion in the ages at death, the metric most used to measure lifetime uncertainty. Using mortality data from the Global Burden of Disease Study and the Internal Peace Index between 2008 and 2017, we find that the most violent countries are also those with the highest lifetime uncertainty. In the Middle East, conflict-related deaths are the largest contributor to lifetime uncertainty. In Latin America, a similar pattern is attributable to homicides. The effects are larger in magnitude for men, but the consequences remain considerable for women. Our study points to a double burden of violence on longevity: Not only does violence shorten individual lives, but it also makes the length of life less predictable.
寿命不确定性是一个关键的公共卫生指标,也是衡量生存不平等的标志。暴力的严重程度如何影响寿命不确定性?我们通过量化暴力对死亡年龄离散度的影响来回答这个问题,这是衡量寿命不确定性最常用的指标。利用 2008 年至 2017 年全球疾病负担研究和内部和平指数中的死亡率数据,我们发现最暴力的国家也是寿命不确定性最高的国家。在中东,与冲突有关的死亡是导致寿命不确定性的最大因素。在拉丁美洲,类似的模式归因于凶杀案。这种影响在男性中更为显著,但对女性的影响仍然相当大。我们的研究表明,暴力对长寿有双重负担:暴力不仅缩短了个人的寿命,而且还使寿命的可预测性降低。