• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pediatric Palliative Care: Insights into Assessment Tools andReview Instruments.儿科姑息治疗:评估工具与综述工具的见解
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;10(8):1406. doi: 10.3390/children10081406.
2
Outcome measurement in paediatric palliative care: lessons from the past and future developments.儿科姑息治疗中的结果测量:过去的经验教训与未来的发展
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;7(Suppl 3):S151-S163. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.04.02. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
3
A Tool for the Evaluation of Clinical Needs and Eligibility to Pediatric Palliative Care: The Validation of the ACCAPED Scale.用于评估儿科姑息治疗临床需求和资格的工具:ACCAPED 量表的验证。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;24(2):205-210. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0148. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
Who needs and continues to need paediatric palliative care? An evaluation of utility and feasibility of the Paediatric Palliative Screening scale (PaPaS).谁需要并持续需要儿科姑息治疗?儿科姑息治疗筛选量表(PaPaS)的效用和可行性评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Feb 10;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0524-4.
5
Pediatric Palliative Care.儿科姑息治疗
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Oct;49(sup1):422-430. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1964867. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
6
Strengths, Gaps, and Opportunities: Results of a Statewide Community Needs Assessment of Pediatric Palliative Care and Hospice Resources.优势、差距和机遇:全州儿科姑息治疗和临终关怀资源社区需求评估结果。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Sep;60(3):512-521.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Using EmPalPed-An Educational Toolkit on Essential Messages in Palliative Care and Pain Management in Children-As a Strategy to Promote Pediatric Palliative Care.使用EmPalPed——儿童姑息治疗和疼痛管理基本信息教育工具包——作为促进儿童姑息治疗的一项策略。
Children (Basel). 2022 Jun 6;9(6):838. doi: 10.3390/children9060838.
9
Delphi Method to Develop a Palliative Care Tool for Children and Families in Sub-Saharan Africa.德尔菲法制定撒哈拉以南非洲儿童和家庭姑息治疗工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):962-970. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.021. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
10
Physician Perceptions of Palliative Care for Children With Cancer in Latin America.拉丁美洲儿科癌症患者姑息治疗的医师认知。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221245. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1245.

引用本文的文献

1
Needs, status and future directions in palliative care for children with cancer: an insight into the Italian situation.癌症患儿姑息治疗的需求、现状及未来方向:意大利情况洞察
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 16;15:1582341. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1582341. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of surgical simulation and training technologies on general surgery education.手术模拟和培训技术对普通外科学教育的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1297. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06299-w.
3
A cutting-edge new framework for the pain management in children: nanotechnology.一种用于儿童疼痛管理的前沿新框架:纳米技术。
Front Mol Neurosci. 2024 Sep 10;17:1391092. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1391092. eCollection 2024.
4
The specialized pediatric palliative care service in Italy: how is it working? Results of the nationwide PalliPed study.意大利的专业儿科姑息治疗服务:它是如何运作的?全国 PalliPed 研究的结果。
Ital J Pediatr. 2024 Mar 19;50(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13052-024-01604-1.
5
Assessment of Parental Needs and Quality of Life in Children with a Rare Neuromuscular Disease (Pompe Disease): A Quantitative-Qualitative Study.罕见神经肌肉疾病(庞贝氏病)患儿家长的需求与生活质量评估:一项定量-定性研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;13(12):956. doi: 10.3390/bs13120956.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Pediatric Palliative Care Quality: Challenges and Opportunities.测量儿科姑息治疗质量:挑战与机遇。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):e483-e495. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
International project on troublesome symptoms in paediatric palliative care will focus on neuro-irritability, dystonia and sleep disorders.国际儿童姑息治疗中棘手症状项目将聚焦于神经易激惹、肌张力障碍和睡眠障碍。
Acta Paediatr. 2023 Mar;112(3):569-570. doi: 10.1111/apa.16663. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
3
International Standards for Pediatric Palliative Care: From IMPaCCT to GO-PPaCS.《儿科姑息治疗国际标准:从IMPaCCT到GO-PPaCS》
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 May;63(5):e529-e543. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.031. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice.儿科姑息治疗中的疼痛评估工具:心理测量特性的系统评价及临床实践建议。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;36(1):30-43. doi: 10.1177/02692163211049309. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
Development and psychometric validation of the family-centered multidimensional outcome measure for pediatric palliative care targeted to children with severe neurological impairmentis-A multicenter prospective study.针对患有严重神经功能障碍儿童的儿科姑息治疗的以家庭为中心的多维结局测量工具的开发与心理测量学验证——一项多中心前瞻性研究
Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):611-620. doi: 10.1177/0269216320975626. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
6
Face and Content Validity, Acceptability, and Feasibility of the Adapted Version of the Children's Palliative Outcome Scale: A Qualitative Pilot Study.适应版儿童姑息治疗结局量表的表面效度、内容效度、可接受性和可行性:一项定性预试验研究。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;24(2):181-188. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0646. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
A Tool for the Evaluation of Clinical Needs and Eligibility to Pediatric Palliative Care: The Validation of the ACCAPED Scale.用于评估儿科姑息治疗临床需求和资格的工具:ACCAPED 量表的验证。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;24(2):205-210. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0148. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Factor structure of the Quality of Children's Palliative Care Instrument (QCPCI) when complete by parents of children with cancer.儿童姑息治疗质量工具(QCPCI)的父母完成版的因子结构,用于患有癌症的儿童。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Mar 1;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0406-9.
9
Instruments to Measure Outcomes in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.评估儿科舒缓治疗结局的工具:系统综述。
Pediatrics. 2019 Jan;143(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2379. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
10
Perspectives of parents and nurses on the content validity of the Family Empowerment Scale for parents of children with a chronic condition: A mixed-methods study.慢性病患儿家长与护士对家庭赋权量表内容效度的看法:一项混合方法研究
Child Care Health Dev. 2019 Jan;45(1):111-120. doi: 10.1111/cch.12629.

儿科姑息治疗:评估工具与综述工具的见解

Pediatric Palliative Care: Insights into Assessment Tools andReview Instruments.

作者信息

Papa Simonetta, Mercante Anna, Giacomelli Luca, Benini Franca

机构信息

Polistudium SRL, 20121 Milan, Italy.

Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Ospedale San Bortolo, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;10(8):1406. doi: 10.3390/children10081406.

DOI:10.3390/children10081406
PMID:37628404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10453330/
Abstract

The proper assessment of needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is imperativeto ensure the best possible service to patients and families. However, given the multidimensionalnature of PPC, the low number of patients in this setting, the heterogeneity of diseases, the presenceof cognitive impairment in many patients, and the physiological development of children, outcomescan be complex and difficult to measure. Consequently, in this context, the use of standardizedand validated tools to assess the needs of children and families, to assess symptom severity, andto estimate the quality of PPC service represent a current need. Even if efforts have been made tostandardize approaches and tools for palliative care in adults, to our knowledge, a similar comprehensiveassessment of PPC has not yet been conducted to date. This narrative review provides anoverview and discusses the evaluation of tools currently applied in PPC, with an educational intentfor healthcare providers. We found that several instruments are available to assess different dimensionsof PPC. We proposed a classification into eligibility tools, patient and family needs assessmenttools, and care assessment tools. At present, two main eligibility tools exist, the PaPaS Scale and theACCAPED Scale questionnaire. Most of the tools for patient and family needs assessment have notbeen specifically validated in the PPC setting, and many may be more readily applied in researchsettings rather than in daily practice. Similar considerations can be made for tools assessing QoL,while tools assessing PPC service quality seem to be easily applied. Efforts to develop new specifictools and validate existing ones are undoubtedly advocated. However, in the patient's best interest,PPC healthcare providers should start using available tools, regardless of their validation status.

摘要

在儿科姑息治疗(PPC)中,对需求和结果进行恰当评估对于确保为患者及其家庭提供尽可能最佳的服务至关重要。然而,鉴于PPC的多维度性质、该领域患者数量较少、疾病的异质性、许多患者存在认知障碍以及儿童的生理发育情况,结果可能很复杂且难以衡量。因此,在这种情况下,使用标准化且经过验证的工具来评估儿童及其家庭的需求、评估症状严重程度以及评估PPC服务质量成为当前的一项需求。尽管已经努力对成人姑息治疗的方法和工具进行标准化,但据我们所知,迄今为止尚未对PPC进行类似的全面评估。这篇叙述性综述提供了一个概述,并讨论了目前在PPC中应用的工具的评估情况,旨在为医疗保健提供者提供教育。我们发现有几种工具可用于评估PPC的不同维度。我们提议将其分为资格评估工具、患者及家庭需求评估工具和护理评估工具。目前,存在两种主要的资格评估工具,即PaPaS量表和ACCAPED量表问卷。大多数患者及家庭需求评估工具尚未在PPC环境中得到专门验证,而且许多工具可能更适用于研究环境而非日常实践。对于评估生活质量的工具也有类似的考虑,而评估PPC服务质量的工具似乎易于应用。毫无疑问,提倡开发新的特定工具并验证现有工具。然而,为了患者的最大利益,PPC医疗保健提供者应开始使用现有的工具,无论其验证状态如何。