Papa Simonetta, Mercante Anna, Giacomelli Luca, Benini Franca
Polistudium SRL, 20121 Milan, Italy.
Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Ospedale San Bortolo, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;10(8):1406. doi: 10.3390/children10081406.
The proper assessment of needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is imperativeto ensure the best possible service to patients and families. However, given the multidimensionalnature of PPC, the low number of patients in this setting, the heterogeneity of diseases, the presenceof cognitive impairment in many patients, and the physiological development of children, outcomescan be complex and difficult to measure. Consequently, in this context, the use of standardizedand validated tools to assess the needs of children and families, to assess symptom severity, andto estimate the quality of PPC service represent a current need. Even if efforts have been made tostandardize approaches and tools for palliative care in adults, to our knowledge, a similar comprehensiveassessment of PPC has not yet been conducted to date. This narrative review provides anoverview and discusses the evaluation of tools currently applied in PPC, with an educational intentfor healthcare providers. We found that several instruments are available to assess different dimensionsof PPC. We proposed a classification into eligibility tools, patient and family needs assessmenttools, and care assessment tools. At present, two main eligibility tools exist, the PaPaS Scale and theACCAPED Scale questionnaire. Most of the tools for patient and family needs assessment have notbeen specifically validated in the PPC setting, and many may be more readily applied in researchsettings rather than in daily practice. Similar considerations can be made for tools assessing QoL,while tools assessing PPC service quality seem to be easily applied. Efforts to develop new specifictools and validate existing ones are undoubtedly advocated. However, in the patient's best interest,PPC healthcare providers should start using available tools, regardless of their validation status.
在儿科姑息治疗(PPC)中,对需求和结果进行恰当评估对于确保为患者及其家庭提供尽可能最佳的服务至关重要。然而,鉴于PPC的多维度性质、该领域患者数量较少、疾病的异质性、许多患者存在认知障碍以及儿童的生理发育情况,结果可能很复杂且难以衡量。因此,在这种情况下,使用标准化且经过验证的工具来评估儿童及其家庭的需求、评估症状严重程度以及评估PPC服务质量成为当前的一项需求。尽管已经努力对成人姑息治疗的方法和工具进行标准化,但据我们所知,迄今为止尚未对PPC进行类似的全面评估。这篇叙述性综述提供了一个概述,并讨论了目前在PPC中应用的工具的评估情况,旨在为医疗保健提供者提供教育。我们发现有几种工具可用于评估PPC的不同维度。我们提议将其分为资格评估工具、患者及家庭需求评估工具和护理评估工具。目前,存在两种主要的资格评估工具,即PaPaS量表和ACCAPED量表问卷。大多数患者及家庭需求评估工具尚未在PPC环境中得到专门验证,而且许多工具可能更适用于研究环境而非日常实践。对于评估生活质量的工具也有类似的考虑,而评估PPC服务质量的工具似乎易于应用。毫无疑问,提倡开发新的特定工具并验证现有工具。然而,为了患者的最大利益,PPC医疗保健提供者应开始使用现有的工具,无论其验证状态如何。