• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左束支区域起搏中导线植入的临床应用条件及模拟导线断裂率

Clinical use conditions of lead deployment and simulated lead fracture rate in left bundle branch area pacing.

作者信息

Zou Jiangang, Chen Keping, Liu Xingbin, Xu Yuanning, Jiang Lingyun, Dai Yan, Lin Jinxuan, Hou Xiaofeng, Qiu Yuanhao, Himes Adam, Lucas Ryan, Demmer Wade, Mara Nicki, Zhou Xiaohong, Lu Hongyang

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):718-725. doi: 10.1111/jce.15843. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1111/jce.15843
PMID:36738153
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is achieved by advancing the lead tip deep in the septum. Most LBBAP implants are performed using the Medtronic SelectSecure™ MRI SecureScan™ Model 3830 featuring a unique 4 Fr fixed helix lumenless design. Details of lead use conditions and long-term reliability have not been reported. This study was designed to quantify the mechanical use conditions for the 3830 lead during and after LBBAP implant, and to evaluate reliability using bench testing and simulation.

METHODS

Fifty bradycardia patients with implantation of the 3830 lead for LBBAP were enrolled. Use conditions of lead deployment at implantation were collected and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at 3-month follow-up. Curvature amplitude along the pacing lead was determined with CT images. Fatigue bending was performed using accelerated testing in a more severe environment than routine clinical use conditions. Conductor fracture rate in a simulated patient population was estimated based on clinical use conditions and fatigue test results.

RESULTS

The number of attempts to place the 3830 lead for LBBAP was 2.1 ± 1.3 (range: 1-7) with 13 ± 6 lead rotations at the final attempt. Extreme implant conditions were simulated in bench testing with 5 applications of 20 turns followed by up to 400 million bending cycles. Reliability modeling predicted a 10-year fracture rate of 0.02%.

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP implants require more lead rotations than standard pacing implants and result in unique lead bending. Application of simulated LBBAP use conditions to the 3830 lead in an accelerated in-vitro model does not produce excess conductor fractures. IMAGE-LBBP Study ID of ClinicalTrial.GOV: NCT04119323.

摘要

引言

左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)是通过将导线尖端推进到间隔深处来实现的。大多数LBBAP植入手术使用美敦力SelectSecure™ MRI SecureScan™ 3830型号导线,其具有独特的4 Fr固定螺旋无腔设计。导线使用条件和长期可靠性的细节尚未见报道。本研究旨在量化LBBAP植入过程中和植入后3830型号导线的机械使用条件,并通过台架测试和模拟评估其可靠性。

方法

纳入50例植入3830型号导线进行LBBAP的心动过缓患者。收集植入时导线展开的使用条件,并在3个月随访时进行计算机断层扫描(CT)。利用CT图像确定沿起搏导线的曲率幅度。在比常规临床使用条件更恶劣的环境中进行加速测试以进行疲劳弯曲。根据临床使用条件和疲劳测试结果估计模拟患者群体中的导线断裂率。

结果

用于LBBAP的3830型号导线放置尝试次数为2.1±1.3次(范围:1 - 7次),最后一次尝试时导线旋转13±6次。在台架测试中模拟极端植入条件,进行5次20圈的应用,随后进行多达4亿次弯曲循环。可靠性建模预测10年断裂率为0.02%。

结论

LBBAP植入比标准起搏植入需要更多的导线旋转次数,并导致独特的导线弯曲。在加速体外模型中将模拟的LBBAP使用条件应用于3830型号导线不会导致过多的导线断裂。ClinicalTrial.GOV的IMAGE - LBBP研究识别号:NCT04119323。

相似文献

1
Clinical use conditions of lead deployment and simulated lead fracture rate in left bundle branch area pacing.左束支区域起搏中导线植入的临床应用条件及模拟导线断裂率
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):718-725. doi: 10.1111/jce.15843. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Lead performance of stylet-driven leads in left bundle branch area pacing: Results from a large single-center cohort and insights from in vitro bench testing.探条驱动电极导线在左束支区域起搏中的领先表现:来自大型单中心队列的结果及体外台架测试的见解
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jun;21(6):865-873. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.049. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing.前瞻性评估左束支区域起搏的可行性及电生理和超声心动图特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1774-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 25.
4
The Implantation of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with and without Bundle Branch Block.左束支区域起搏在有和无束支阻滞患者中的植入。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Nov;31(11):1268-1272. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.11.1268.
5
Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing.左束支区域起搏与传统右心室起搏的即刻临床转归。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Aug;42(8):768-773. doi: 10.1002/clc.23215. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.心力衰竭合并完全性左束支传导阻滞患者中左束支区域起搏与双心室起搏的长期预后
Heart Vessels. 2022 Jul;37(7):1162-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-02016-5. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.左束支区域起搏抢救冠状静脉内起搏失败或双心室起搏无反应:来自国际 LBBAP 协作研究组的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug;19(8):1272-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.024. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
8
Left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads with a new delivery sheath: A comparison with lumen-less leads.使用新型输送鞘的 Stylet 驱动起搏导线进行左束支区域起搏:与无腔导线的比较。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):439-448. doi: 10.1111/jce.14851. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
9
Feasibility and safety of both His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: intermediate term follow-up.希氏束起搏和左束支区域起搏在心房颤动患者中的可行性和安全性:中期随访。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;66(2):271-280. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00964-6. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Contrast-enhanced image-guided lead deployment for left bundle branch pacing.对比增强图像引导的左束支起搏导线植入术。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Aug;18(8):1318-1325. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple electrode leads facilitate left bundle branch area pacing: A concept evaluation study.多电极导线有助于左束支区域起搏:一项概念评估研究。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 May 8;6(7):1005-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.04.012. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) clinical consensus statement on indications for conduction system pacing, with special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC and endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)关于传导系统起搏指征的临床共识声明,欧洲心律协会对ESC有特别贡献,并得到亚太心律协会、加拿大心律协会、心律协会和拉丁美洲心律协会的认可。
Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf050.
3
Sensing and detection performance of the novel, small-diameter OmniaSecure defibrillation lead: in-depth analysis from the LEADR trial.新型小直径OmniaSecure除颤导线的传感与检测性能:来自LEADR试验的深入分析
Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf062.
4
Stylet-driven Leads or Lumenless Leads for Conduction System Pacing.用于传导系统起搏的探条驱动导线或无腔导线。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Sep 13;13:e14. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.18. eCollection 2024.
5
Lumenless and Stylet-Driven Leads for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: Materials, Techniques, Benefits, and Trade-Offs of the Two Approaches.用于左束支区域起搏的无腔和导丝驱动电极:两种方法的材料、技术、益处及权衡
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4758. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164758.
6
The Emerging Role of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.左束支区域起搏在心脏再同步治疗中的新兴作用
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Dec 1;12:e29. doi: 10.15420/aer.2023.15. eCollection 2023.