• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瘢痕化左心室中左束支起搏手术失败的预测因素

Predictors of procedural failure of left bundle branch pacing in scarred left ventricle.

作者信息

Ponnusamy Shunmuga Sundaram, Murugan Mariappan, Ganesan Vithiya, Vijayaraman Pugazhendhi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Velammal Medical College, Madurai, India.

Department of Radiodiagnosis, Velammal Medical College, Madurai, India.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):760-764. doi: 10.1111/jce.15853. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1111/jce.15853
PMID:36738155
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Presence of scar at the implantation-site is considered as a major factor in determining the success of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). We aimed at analyzing the predictors of procedural failure in patients with scarred-left ventricle (LV) as demonstrated by cardiac-magnetic resonance-imaging (CMR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational single-center-study that included consecutive cardiomyopathy patients with LV-scar as demonstrated by late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) in CMR requiring LBBP. Procedural-failure was defined as the inability to penetrate the septum to reach the LV subendocardium RESULTS: A total of 25 cardiomyopathy patients demonstrated LGE in CMR and were included in the study. LBBP was successful in 16 patients (group-I; 64% acute-procedural-success). In the remaining 9 patients (group-II) lead could not be penetrated and hence biventricular-pacing was done. LBBP resulted in reduction in QRS-duration and improvement in LV ejection fraction in group-I patients during a mean follow-up of 11.2 ± 3.7 months. Computed-tomography-angiography after LBBP showed the successful lead deployment site (LBBP-Zone) as the overlapping areas of inferior aspect of antero-septum and superior aspect of infero-septum (segment 2/3; AHA-model) in short-axis view(figure-1C). CMR showed LGE in significantly more number of LV-segments and high scar-burden in group-II as compared to group-I (figure-1). A total scar score value of >1.0 predicted failure with 100%-sensitivity and 75%-specificity. CMR revealed transmural-scar in the LBBP-Zone in all patients in group-II (n = 9; 100%). Transmural scar in LBBP-Zone by CMR had 100%-sensitivity and 100%-specificity for predicting the procedural-failure.

CONCLUSION

CMR helps in predicting the procedural failure of LBBP in patients with scarred LV. Presence of transmural-LGE in the LBBP-Zone predicts failure with high sensitivity and specificity.

摘要

引言

植入部位存在瘢痕被认为是决定左束支起搏(LBBP)成功与否的主要因素。我们旨在分析经心脏磁共振成像(CMR)证实的左心室(LV)瘢痕患者手术失败的预测因素。

方法

这是一项回顾性、观察性单中心研究,纳入了连续的心肌病患者,这些患者经CMR晚期钆增强(LGE)证实存在LV瘢痕且需要进行LBBP。手术失败定义为无法穿透间隔到达LV心内膜下。结果:共有25例心肌病患者在CMR中显示LGE,并被纳入研究。16例患者LBBP成功(I组;急性手术成功率64%)。其余9例患者(II组)电极无法穿透,因此进行了双心室起搏。I组患者在平均11.2±3.7个月的随访期间,LBBP导致QRS时限缩短和LV射血分数改善。LBBP后计算机断层血管造影显示成功的电极植入部位(LBBP区)为短轴视图下前间隔下方面和下间隔上方面的重叠区域(节段2/3;AHA模型)(图1C)。与I组相比,CMR显示II组LV节段的LGE数量明显更多,瘢痕负荷更高(图1)。总瘢痕评分值>1.0预测失败的敏感性为100%,特异性为75%。CMR显示II组所有患者(n = 9;100%)的LBBP区存在透壁瘢痕。CMR显示LBBP区的透壁瘢痕预测手术失败的敏感性和特异性均为100%。

结论

CMR有助于预测LV瘢痕患者LBBP的手术失败。LBBP区存在透壁LGE预测失败具有高敏感性和特异性。

相似文献

1
Predictors of procedural failure of left bundle branch pacing in scarred left ventricle.瘢痕化左心室中左束支起搏手术失败的预测因素
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):760-764. doi: 10.1111/jce.15853. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
MAgnetic resonance imaging based DUal lead cardiac Resynchronization therapy: A prospectIve Left Bundle Branch Pacing study (MADURAI LBBP study).基于磁共振成像的双导心脏再同步治疗:前瞻性左束支起搏研究(MADURAI LBBP 研究)。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Aug;20(8):1119-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.05.019. Epub 2023 May 20.
3
Left bundle branch area pacing for heart failure patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy: A meta-analysis.左束支区域起搏治疗心力衰竭需要心脏再同步治疗的患者:荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;34(9):1933-1943. doi: 10.1111/jce.16013. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
4
Right sided approach for left bundle branch pacing using lumen-less lead: Technical considerations and follow-up outcome.经心内膜左束支起搏的右侧入路:技术要点和随访结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Dec;34(12):2613-2616. doi: 10.1111/jce.16126. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
5
Early left bundle branch pacing in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.心力衰竭伴轻度射血分数降低和左束支传导阻滞时的早期左束支起搏。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Oct;20(10):1436-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.07.063. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
6
Feasibility, safety and outcomes of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing induced cardiomyopathy.升级为左束支起搏治疗右室起搏诱导心肌病的可行性、安全性和结果。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;45(6):726-732. doi: 10.1111/pace.14515. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
Effect of left bundle branch pacing on right ventricular function: A 3-dimensional echocardiography study.左束支起搏对右心室功能的影响:一项三维超声心动图研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Apr;21(4):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.12.012. Epub 2023 Dec 24.
8
Observations of interventricular septal behavior during left bundle branch pacing.左束支起搏期间室间隔行为的观察
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):2246-2254. doi: 10.1111/jce.16057. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
9
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Acute Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure.左束支起搏与双心室起搏治疗心力衰竭患者的急性心脏再同步化。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022 Nov;15(11):e011181. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011181. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
10
Resynchronization effects and clinical outcomes during left bundle branch area pacing with and without conduction system capture.左束支区域起搏时伴有和不伴有传导系统夺获的再同步化效果和临床结果。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Mar;46(3):287-295. doi: 10.1002/clc.23969. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Pacing: Meta-Analysis on Outcomes in Patients with Non-Left Bundle Branch Block.传导系统起搏与双心室心脏再同步起搏:非左束支传导阻滞患者结局的荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 9;61(7):1240. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071240.
2
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) clinical consensus statement on indications for conduction system pacing, with special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC and endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)关于传导系统起搏指征的临床共识声明,欧洲心律协会对ESC有特别贡献,并得到亚太心律协会、加拿大心律协会、心律协会和拉丁美洲心律协会的认可。
Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf050.
3
Conduction System Pacing for CRT: A Physiological Alternative.心脏再同步治疗的传导系统起搏:一种生理性替代方案。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2025 Feb 18;14:e04. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.10. eCollection 2025.
4
His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者的希氏束起搏与左束支起搏
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 16;12(10):2356. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102356.
5
Left Bundle Branch Block-associated Cardiomyopathy: A New Approach.左束支传导阻滞相关性心肌病:一种新方法。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Sep 25;13:e15. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.14. eCollection 2024.
6
Stylet-driven Leads or Lumenless Leads for Conduction System Pacing.用于传导系统起搏的探条驱动导线或无腔导线。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Sep 13;13:e14. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.18. eCollection 2024.
7
Conduction System Pacing: Hope, Challenges, and the Journey Forward.心脏传导系统起搏:希望、挑战与前行之路。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Aug;26(8):801-814. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02085-8. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
8
Is Conduction System Pacing a Valuable Alternative to Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?传导系统起搏对于心脏再同步治疗而言是双心室起搏的一种有价值的替代方法吗?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 May 2;11(5):144. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11050144.
9
Left bundle branch pacing vs ventricular septal pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中左束支起搏与室间隔起搏的比较
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jan 24;5(3):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.01.005. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived myocardial scar is associated with echocardiographic response and clinical prognosis of left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏磁共振衍生的心肌瘢痕与左束支区域起搏心脏再同步治疗的超声心动图反应和临床预后相关。
Europace. 2023 Nov 2;25(11). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad326.