Underwood Carol R, Casella Albert, Hendrickson Zoé Mistrale
Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior & Society, USA; Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, USA.
Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, USA.
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2023 Mar;35:100815. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100815. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
While considerable research has explored associations between gender norms and various sexual and reproductive health behaviors (SRH) with the aim of informing programs, no studies have examined whether couple concordance on specific gender norms is associated with both contraceptive use and reduced intimate partner violence (IPV) experience.
This study relies on analysis of Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) couples' datasets from Mali, Nigeria, Nepal, Pakistan, Tanzania, and Zambia that were collected in/after 2015 and include the DHS Domestic Violence Module for female respondents. To examine the associations between couple concordance regarding household decision-making or justification of violence (wife beating) and women's use of modern contraceptives or experience of violence, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fit using Stata15.
Joint decision-making about large household purchases was significantly positively associated with modern contraceptive use in all study countries as well as with reduced odds of IPV experience in adjusted models in Tanzania and Zambia. In Nigeria, women's justification for violence was negatively associated with contraceptive use. Across settings, women in couples where both justified violence had significantly increased odds of reporting IPV experience.
The evidence suggests that family planning programs should support joint decision-making as it was positively associated with contraceptive use across the six countries and is a proxy for shared economic power within the household. IPV reduction and prevention programs should also consider encouraging joint decision-making given the correlations found in two settings. Programs should enable participants to interrogate attitudes regarding justifying violence against female partners and propose approaches to avoid IPV. Finally, husbands' alcohol consumption, a strong predictor of IPV experience, has too long been overlooked.
虽然已有大量研究探讨了性别规范与各种性与生殖健康行为(SRH)之间的关联,旨在为相关项目提供信息,但尚无研究考察夫妻在特定性别规范上的一致性是否与避孕措施的使用及亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)经历的减少相关。
本研究依赖于对2015年及以后在马里、尼日利亚、尼泊尔、巴基斯坦、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚收集的人口与健康调查(DHS)夫妻数据集进行分析,这些数据集包含针对女性受访者的DHS家庭暴力模块。为了检验夫妻在家庭决策或暴力正当化(殴打妻子)方面的一致性与女性使用现代避孕措施或暴力经历之间的关联,使用Stata15拟合了双变量和多变量逻辑回归模型。
在所有研究国家,关于大额家庭采购的共同决策与现代避孕措施的使用显著正相关,在坦桑尼亚和赞比亚的调整模型中,也与IPV经历几率的降低相关。在尼日利亚,女性对暴力的正当化与避孕措施的使用呈负相关。在所有环境中,夫妻双方都为暴力行为正当化的女性报告IPV经历的几率显著增加。
证据表明,计划生育项目应支持共同决策,因为在这六个国家中,共同决策与避孕措施的使用呈正相关,且是家庭内部共享经济权力的一个指标。鉴于在两种环境中发现的相关性,减少和预防IPV的项目也应考虑鼓励共同决策。项目应使参与者能够审视对针对女性伴侣的暴力行为进行正当化的态度,并提出避免IPV的方法。最后,丈夫的饮酒行为,这是IPV经历的一个强有力预测因素,长期以来一直被忽视。