Suppr超能文献

与黑人患者的共同决策:一项范围综述。

Shared decision making with black patients: A scoping review.

作者信息

Mhaimeed Nada, Mhaimeed Narjis, Mhaimeed Omar, Alanni Jamal, Burney Zain, Elshafeey Abdallah, Laws Sa'ad, Choi Justin J

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2023 May;110:107646. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107646. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to explore the breadth of research conducted on SDM in the care of Black patients.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review following the methodological framework outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. We searched articles related to original research on SDM in the care of Black patients in October 2022 using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Articles of all study designs (quantitative and qualitative), published or translated into English, were included. A standardized data extraction form and thematic analysis were used to facilitate data extraction by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

After removal of duplicates and screening, 30 articles were included in the final analysis. Black patients and clinician were found to not share the same understanding of SDM, and patients highly valued SDM in their care. Interventions to improve SDM yielded mixed results to enhance intent, participation in SDM, as well as health outcomes. Decision aids were the most effective form of intervention to enhance SDM. The most common barrier to SDM was patient-clinician communication, and was exacerbated by racial discordance, clinician mistrust, past experiences, and paternalistic clinician-patient dynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

SDM has the potential to improve health outcomes in Black patients when implemented contextually within Black patients' experiences and concerns. Significant barriers such as clinician mistrust exist, and the overall perception in the Black community is that SDM does not occur sufficiently. Barriers to SDM seem to be most pronounced when there is patient-clinician racial discordance. Several interventions aimed at improving SDM with Black patients have shown mixed results. Future studies should evaluate larger-scale interventions with longer follow-up. Practice implications Shared decision making (SDM) has been proposed as a useful tool for improving quality and equity in Black patients' care. However, Black patients experience lower rates of SDM compared to other populations. SDM has the potential to improve health outcomes in Black patients when implemented contextually within Black patients' experiences and concerns.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是探讨在黑人患者护理中开展的有关共同决策(SDM)研究的广度。

方法

我们按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单概述的方法框架进行了一项范围综述。2022年10月,我们使用PubMed、Embase和谷歌学术数据库搜索了与黑人患者护理中SDM的原始研究相关的文章。纳入所有已发表或翻译成英文的各种研究设计(定量和定性)的文章。使用标准化的数据提取表和主题分析,以便两名独立的评审员进行数据提取。

结果

在去除重复项和筛选后,最终分析纳入了30篇文章。发现黑人患者和临床医生对SDM的理解不一致,患者高度重视其护理中的SDM。改善SDM的干预措施在增强意愿、参与SDM以及健康结局方面产生了好坏参半的结果。决策辅助工具是增强SDM最有效的干预形式。SDM最常见的障碍是患者与临床医生之间的沟通,种族差异、临床医生的不信任、过去的经历以及家长式的医患关系加剧了这一障碍。

结论

当在黑人患者的经历和关切中因地制宜地实施时,SDM有可能改善黑人患者的健康结局。存在诸如临床医生不信任等重大障碍,黑人社区的总体看法是SDM实施得不够充分。当患者与临床医生存在种族差异时,SDM的障碍似乎最为明显。一些旨在改善与黑人患者共同决策的干预措施显示出好坏参半的结果。未来的研究应评估更大规模、随访时间更长的干预措施。实践意义 共同决策(SDM)已被提议作为改善黑人患者护理质量和公平性的有用工具。然而,与其他人群相比,黑人患者的SDM发生率较低。当在黑人患者的经历和关切中因地制宜地实施时,SDM有可能改善黑人患者的健康结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验