文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Shared decision making with black patients: A scoping review.

作者信息

Mhaimeed Nada, Mhaimeed Narjis, Mhaimeed Omar, Alanni Jamal, Burney Zain, Elshafeey Abdallah, Laws Sa'ad, Choi Justin J

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2023 May;110:107646. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107646. Epub 2023 Jan 25.


DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107646
PMID:36739706
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to explore the breadth of research conducted on SDM in the care of Black patients. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review following the methodological framework outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. We searched articles related to original research on SDM in the care of Black patients in October 2022 using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Articles of all study designs (quantitative and qualitative), published or translated into English, were included. A standardized data extraction form and thematic analysis were used to facilitate data extraction by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates and screening, 30 articles were included in the final analysis. Black patients and clinician were found to not share the same understanding of SDM, and patients highly valued SDM in their care. Interventions to improve SDM yielded mixed results to enhance intent, participation in SDM, as well as health outcomes. Decision aids were the most effective form of intervention to enhance SDM. The most common barrier to SDM was patient-clinician communication, and was exacerbated by racial discordance, clinician mistrust, past experiences, and paternalistic clinician-patient dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: SDM has the potential to improve health outcomes in Black patients when implemented contextually within Black patients' experiences and concerns. Significant barriers such as clinician mistrust exist, and the overall perception in the Black community is that SDM does not occur sufficiently. Barriers to SDM seem to be most pronounced when there is patient-clinician racial discordance. Several interventions aimed at improving SDM with Black patients have shown mixed results. Future studies should evaluate larger-scale interventions with longer follow-up. Practice implications Shared decision making (SDM) has been proposed as a useful tool for improving quality and equity in Black patients' care. However, Black patients experience lower rates of SDM compared to other populations. SDM has the potential to improve health outcomes in Black patients when implemented contextually within Black patients' experiences and concerns.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Shared decision making with black patients: A scoping review.

Patient Educ Couns. 2023-5

[2]
Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.

Ann Fam Med. 2025-3-24

[3]
Exploration of shared decision making in oncology within the United States: a scoping review.

Support Care Cancer. 2022-12-31

[4]
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.

Med J Aust. 2020-12

[5]
Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-2-21

[6]
Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020-8-12

[7]
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Shared Decision Making: Scoping Review.

JMIR Med Inform. 2022-8-9

[8]
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.

J Gen Intern Med. 2018-7-20

[9]
Development of a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Shared Decision making Among African-American LGBT Patients and their Clinicians.

J Gen Intern Med. 2016-6

[10]
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010-5-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Use of Co-Design Approaches to Identify Barriers to Health-Promoting Behaviors among African American Breast Cancer Survivors with Comorbid Obesity.

Health Behav Res. 2024-10

[2]
Real-world experience of barriers to diagnosis, early detection and disease management among migrants living with HIV in Spain: a qualitative study.

Ann Med. 2025-12

[3]
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation by Sex and Within High and Low Stroke Risk Populations.

J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2025-6-15

[4]
Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.

Ann Fam Med. 2025-3-24

[5]
Shared decision making in routine oncology appointments with Black patients with lung cancer.

Support Care Cancer. 2025-3-5

[6]
Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-2-21

[7]
Persistence of Lithium Underutilization in Patients of African Ancestry with Bipolar Disorder.

Psychopharmacol Bull. 2025-1-1

[8]
Patient Perspectives on Arteriovenous Fistula Placement, Maturation, and Use: A Qualitative Study.

Kidney Med. 2024-10-16

[9]
Factors Associated With Healthcare and Financial Decision Making Among Older Black Adults Without Dementia.

Clin Gerontol. 2025

[10]
Validating a model for predicting breast cancer and nonbreast cancer death in women aged 55 years and older.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024-1-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索