Schlaikjær Hartwig Tanja, Ambye Louise, Gruhn Jennifer R, Petersen Jesper Friis, Wrønding Tine, Amato Letizia, Chi-Ho Chan Andrew, Ji Boyang, Bro-Jørgensen Maiken Hemme, Werge Lene, Petersen Mette Marie Babiel Schmidt, Brinkmann Clara, Ribberholt Julie Boesgaard, Dunø Morten, Bache Iben, Herrgård Markus J, Jørgensen Finn Stener, Hoffmann Eva R, Nielsen Henriette Svarre
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Hvidovre Hospitals NIPT Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Hvidovre Hospitals NIPT Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Lancet. 2023 Mar 4;401(10378):762-771. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02610-1. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
One in four pregnancies end in a pregnancy loss. Although the effect on couples is well documented, evidence-based treatments and prediction models are absent. Fetal aneuploidy is associated with a higher chance of a next successful pregnancy compared with euploid pregnancy loss in which underlying maternal conditions might be causal. Ploidy diagnostics are therefore advantageous but challenging as they require collection of the pregnancy tissue. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal blood has the potential for evaluation of fetal ploidy status, but no large-scale validation of the method has been done.
In this prospective cohort study, women with a pregnancy loss were recruited as a part of the Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss (COPL) study from three gynaecological clinics at public hospitals in Denmark. Women were eligible for inclusion if older than 18 years with a pregnancy loss before gestational age 22 weeks (ie, 154 days) and with an intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound (including anembryonic sac), and women with pregnancies of unknown location or molar pregnancies were excluded. Maternal blood was collected while pregnancy tissue was still in situ or within 24 h after pregnancy tissue had passed and was analysed by genome-wide sequencing of cffDNA. Direct sequencing of the pregnancy tissue was done as reference.
We included 1000 consecutive women, at the time of a pregnancy loss diagnosis, between Nov 12, 2020, and May 1, 2022. Results from the first 333 women with a pregnancy loss (recruited between Nov 12, 2020, and Aug 14, 2021) were used to evaluate the validity of cffDNA-based testing. Results from the other 667 women were included to evaluate cffDNA performance and result distribution in a larger cohort of 1000 women in total. Gestational age of fetus ranged from 35-149 days (mean of 70·5 days [SD 16·5], or 10 weeks plus 1 day). The cffDNA-based test had a sensitivity for aneuploidy detection of 85% (95% CI 79-90) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI 88-96) compared with direct sequencing of the pregnancy tissue. Among 1000 cffDNA-based test results, 446 (45%) were euploid, 405 (41%) aneuploid, 37 (4%) had multiple aneuploidies, and 112 (11%) were inconclusive. 105 (32%) of 333 women either did not manage to collect the pregnancy tissue or collected a sample classified as unknown tissue giving a high risk of being maternal.
This validation of cffDNA-based testing in pregnancy loss shows the potential and feasibility of the method to distinguish euploid and aneuploid pregnancy loss for improved clinical management and benefit of future reproductive medicine and women's health research.
Ole Kirks Foundation, BioInnovation Institute Foundation, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation.
四分之一的妊娠以流产告终。尽管流产对夫妇的影响已有充分记录,但缺乏基于证据的治疗方法和预测模型。与整倍体妊娠流产相比,胎儿非整倍体与下一胎成功妊娠的几率更高,而整倍体妊娠流产可能由潜在的母体状况引起。因此,倍性诊断具有优势,但具有挑战性,因为它们需要收集妊娠组织。母体血液中的游离胎儿DNA(cffDNA)有评估胎儿倍性状态的潜力,但该方法尚未进行大规模验证。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,作为哥本哈根流产(COPL)研究的一部分,从丹麦公立医院的三家妇科诊所招募流产妇女。年龄超过18岁、妊娠22周(即154天)前流产且经超声确认宫内妊娠(包括空妊娠囊)的妇女符合纳入标准,排除妊娠位置不明或葡萄胎妊娠的妇女。在妊娠组织仍在原位时或妊娠组织排出后24小时内采集母体血液,并通过cffDNA的全基因组测序进行分析。对妊娠组织进行直接测序作为对照。
在2020年11月12日至2022年5月1日期间,我们纳入了1000名连续流产诊断时的妇女。前333名流产妇女(2020年11月12日至2021年8月14日招募)的结果用于评估基于cffDNA检测的有效性。纳入另外667名妇女的结果,以评估在总共1000名妇女的更大队列中cffDNA的性能和结果分布。胎儿孕周为35 - 149天(平均70.5天[标准差16.5],即10周加1天)。与妊娠组织的直接测序相比,基于cffDNA的检测对非整倍体检测的敏感性为85%(95%置信区间79 - 90),特异性为93%(95%置信区间88 - 96)。在1000份基于cffDNA的检测结果中,446份(45%)为整倍体,405份(41%)为非整倍体,37份(4%)有多个非整倍体,112份(11%)结果不确定。333名妇女中有105名(32%)未能收集到妊娠组织或收集的样本被归类为未知组织,存在高母体污染风险。
这项对流产中基于cffDNA检测的验证表明,该方法对于区分整倍体和非整倍体流产具有潜力和可行性,有助于改善临床管理,并为未来生殖医学和女性健康研究带来益处。
奥莱·柯克斯基金会、生物创新研究所基金会和诺和诺德基金会。