Park Chanhyun, Heo Ji-Haeng, Mehta Sanica, Han Sola, Spencer Jennifer C
College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2400 Inner Campus Drive, Austin, TX, 78705, USA.
College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Clin Drug Investig. 2023 Mar;43(3):167-176. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01247-w. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Although improving adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapies (AETs) is critical to ensure better patient outcomes, the evidence is still lacking on differences in 5-year AET adherence trajectories. This study aimed to estimate the time trend of adherence by the type of individual AET and the association of adherence to AETs with overall survival among older women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
This study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database 2006-2016. We included women aged ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and who had initiated AET (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen). Adherence to AETs was defined as the proportion of days covered that was calculated for the follow-up period (5 years). The overall survival time was defined as the time from the date of AET initiation to death. The linear mixed models with repeated measures were used to estimate the changes in adherence to AETs. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the relationships (hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) between adherence to AETs and death.
A total of 11,617 patients were included. Anastrozole was the most commonly used (n = 6,908), followed by letrozole (n = 2,586), tamoxifen (n = 1,750), and exemestane (n = 373). The mean (standard deviation) of proportion of days covered for 5 years was 57.4 (34.6), indicating the highest proportion of days covered in the anastrozole group [61.1 (34.1)] and the lowest proportion of days covered in the exemestane group [44.0 (35.1)]. Overall, adherence to AET decreased over the 5-year follow-up period in all AET groups, but the decrease in the tamoxifen group was steeper (42.3% decreased) compared with other AETs. Anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane groups were associated with a lower risk of death compared with the tamoxifen group (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.89 for anastrozole; HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93 for letrozole; HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.07 for exemestane).
Patients who initiated with tamoxifen had a steeper decrease in adherence over the 5 years compared with anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane groups. Furthermore, higher adherence was associated with a decreased risk of mortality. Physicians should be cognizant of decreasing adherence over time and choose effective treatment options with minimal side-effect profiles to better support adherence by patients with breast cancer.
尽管提高辅助内分泌治疗(AETs)的依从性对于确保更好的患者预后至关重要,但关于5年AET依从性轨迹差异的证据仍然不足。本研究旨在估计个体AET类型的依从性时间趋势,以及AETs依从性与激素受体阳性老年乳腺癌女性总生存之间的关联。
本研究使用了2006 - 2016年的监测、流行病学和最终结果 - 医疗保险数据库。我们纳入了年龄≥65岁、新诊断为激素受体阳性乳腺癌且已开始AET(阿那曲唑、来曲唑、依西美坦或他莫昔芬)治疗的女性。AETs的依从性定义为随访期(5年)内覆盖天数的比例。总生存时间定义为从开始AET治疗之日到死亡的时间。采用重复测量的线性混合模型来估计AETs依从性的变化。采用Cox比例风险模型评估AETs依从性与死亡之间的关系(风险比[HR]和95%置信区间[CI])。
共纳入11,617例患者。阿那曲唑是最常用的药物(n = 6,908),其次是来曲唑(n = 2,586)、他莫昔芬(n = 1,750)和依西美坦(n = 373)。5年覆盖天数比例的均值(标准差)为57.4(34.6),表明阿那曲唑组覆盖天数比例最高[61.1(34.1)],依西美坦组覆盖天数比例最低[44.0(35.1)]。总体而言,在所有AET组中,5年随访期内AET的依从性均下降,但他莫昔芬组的下降幅度比其他AETs更大(下降了42.3%)。与他莫昔芬组相比,阿那曲唑、来曲唑和依西美坦组的死亡风险较低(阿那曲唑的HR = 0.80,95% CI 0.71 - 0.89;来曲唑的HR = 0.82,95% CI 0.72 - 0.93;依西美坦的HR = 0.82,95% CI 0.63 - 1.07)。
与阿那曲唑、来曲唑和依西美坦组相比,起始使用他莫昔芬的患者在5年内依从性下降幅度更大。此外,更高的依从性与降低的死亡风险相关。医生应意识到依从性随时间的下降,并选择副作用最小的有效治疗方案,以更好地支持乳腺癌患者的依从性。