Suppr超能文献

癌症疼痛阿片类药物处方的执业护士预测因素:定量结果

Predictors of Nurse Practitioner Prescription of Opioids for Cancer Pain: Quantitative Results.

作者信息

McMenamin Erin, Kellermann Marye, Cunningham Regina, Selway Janet

机构信息

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Adv Pract Oncol. 2023 Jan;14(1):22-35. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.1.2. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurse practitioners (NPs) have assumed a greater role in the management of pain related to cancer. Several studies have associated adequate management of cancer pain with improved survival. Opioids are an essential treatment for cancer pain management and thus it is important to understand influences on prescribing these substances. However, due to a lack of previous studies on this topic, little is known about the influences on NP prescription of opioids for patients with pain due to cancer.

PURPOSE

Competent decision-making is highly correlated with dominant personality characteristics and dominant decision-making styles in everyday life. The rational approach to decision-making has demonstrated superior performance with different daily tasks, including career-related tasks. However, it is unknown whether dominant personality and/or decision-making style impacts the decisions of medical professionals. Using the Diffusion of Innovations theoretical framework, this study evaluated whether dominant personality, dominant decision style, advanced specialty certification, and/or demographic factors influenced oncology NP opioid prescribing proficiency (termed opioid decision score, or ODS) according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines. Other advanced practice providers (APPs) were excluded from the study due to controlled substance prescribing limitations.

METHODS

An internet-based descriptive comparative study was performed evaluating the dominant personality characteristic and dominant decision-making style as a predictor of opioid prescribing among NPs working in oncology. Participants were recruited using lists from the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) and American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). A nationwide convenience sample of NPs working with adult oncology patients was evaluated for opioid prescribing according to recommendations in the NCCN Cancer Pain Guidelines.

RESULTS

Univariate linear regression revealed a statistically significant increase in the ODS as the Big Five Inventory (BFI) Openness scale score increased (estimate = 0.36, standard error [] = 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.03-0.69). Nurse practitioners reporting advanced specialty certification in oncology and/or hospice or palliative care scored significantly higher on the ODS compared with those with no advanced specialty certification ( = 81, = 2.86, 2.34, = -2.75, 178, = .0065).

CONCLUSION

This study provides preliminary findings regarding the decision-making of NPs working with oncology patients and prescribing opioids for cancer pain. Nurse practitioners with a dominant personality characteristic of openness and those reporting an advanced specialty certification in oncology and/or hospice or palliative care were more likely to prescribe opioids for patients with cancer according to NCCN Guidelines. Further investigation is needed to determine additional factors impacting prescribing of controlled sub-stance by NPs and other prescribers.

摘要

背景

执业护士(NPs)在癌症相关疼痛管理中发挥着越来越重要的作用。多项研究表明,癌症疼痛的充分管理与生存率的提高相关。阿片类药物是癌症疼痛管理的重要治疗手段,因此了解影响这些药物处方的因素非常重要。然而,由于此前缺乏关于该主题的研究,对于影响NPs为癌症疼痛患者开具阿片类药物处方的因素知之甚少。

目的

在日常生活中,胜任的决策与主导人格特征和主导决策风格高度相关。理性的决策方法在包括职业相关任务在内的不同日常任务中表现出卓越的性能。然而,主导人格和/或决策风格是否会影响医学专业人员的决策尚不清楚。本研究使用创新扩散理论框架,根据美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南,评估主导人格、主导决策风格、高级专业认证和/或人口统计学因素是否会影响肿瘤NP阿片类药物处方能力(称为阿片类药物决策评分,或ODS)。由于受管制物质处方限制,其他高级实践提供者(APPs)被排除在研究之外。

方法

进行了一项基于互联网的描述性比较研究,评估主导人格特征和主导决策风格作为肿瘤学领域NPs阿片类药物处方的预测因素。使用肿瘤护理学会(ONS)和美国执业护士协会(AANP)的名单招募参与者。根据NCCN癌症疼痛指南中的建议,对全国范围内为成年肿瘤患者提供服务的NPs便利样本进行阿片类药物处方评估。

结果

单变量线性回归显示,随着大五人格量表(BFI)开放性量表得分的增加,ODS有统计学意义的显著增加(估计值 = 0.36,标准误差[] = 0.17,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.03 - 0.69)。报告在肿瘤学和/或临终关怀或姑息治疗方面有高级专业认证的执业护士在ODS上的得分显著高于没有高级专业认证的护士(= 81,= 2.86,2.34,= -2.75,178,= 0.0065)。

结论

本研究提供了关于肿瘤学领域NPs为癌症疼痛患者开具阿片类药物处方决策的初步结果。具有开放性主导人格特征的执业护士以及报告在肿瘤学和/或临终关怀或姑息治疗方面有高级专业认证的护士更有可能根据NCCN指南为癌症患者开具阿片类药物。需要进一步调查以确定影响NPs和其他开处方者开具受管制物质的其他因素。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Nurse Practitioner Prescription of Opioids for Cancer Pain: Quantitative Results.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2023 Jan;14(1):22-35. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.1.2. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
3
The impact of CARA mandates on nurse practitioner controlled substance prescribing in Oregon: a cohort study.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Jan 31;17(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00431-z.
4
[Patterns of prescription of opioid analgesics in Hôtel-Dieu de France of Beyrouth].
Encephale. 2016 Dec;42(6):511-516. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
A survey of nurse practitioner controlled drugs and substances prescribing in three Canadian provinces.
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4342-4356. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15008. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
6
Assessing Practice Patterns and Influential Factors for Nurse Practitioners Who Manage Chronic Pain.
Pain Manag Nurs. 2021 Jun;22(3):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
National opioid prescribing trends in emergency departments by provider type: 2005-2015.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1439-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.041. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Opioid-prescribing Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries Managed by Nurse Practitioners and Physicians.
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57(6):482-489. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001126.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioids in cancer-related pain: current situation and outlook.
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Aug;27(8):3105-3118. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04828-8. Epub 2019 May 24.
2
An Overview of Cancer Pain: Epidemiology and Pathophysiology.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jun;35(3):223-228. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 May 10.
3
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Mechanisms, Predictors, and Challenges in Assessing and Managing Painful Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jun;35(3):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Interprofessional pain education-with, from, and about competent, collaborative practice teams to transform pain care.
Pain Rep. 2018 May 30;3(3):e663. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000663. eCollection 2018 May.
6
Opioids for cancer pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD012592. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012592.pub2.
7
Pain and Opioids in Cancer Care: Benefits, Risks, and Alternatives.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2017;37:705-713. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_180469.
8
Who Chokes Under Pressure? The Big Five Personality Traits and Decision-Making under Pressure.
Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Feb;74:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
9
National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):159-165. doi: 10.1177/1078390316685154. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):1070-1090.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验