Suppr超能文献

谁在压力下会窒息?大五人格特质与压力下的决策

Who Chokes Under Pressure? The Big Five Personality Traits and Decision-Making under Pressure.

作者信息

Byrne Kaileigh A, Silasi-Mansat Crina D, Worthy Darrell A

机构信息

Texas A&M University.

出版信息

Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Feb;74:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine whether the Big Five personality factors could predict who thrives or chokes under pressure during decision-making. The effects of the Big Five personality factors on decision-making ability and performance under social (Experiment 1) and combined social and time pressure (Experiment 2) were examined using the Big Five Personality Inventory and a dynamic decision-making task that required participants to learn an optimal strategy. In Experiment 1, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed an interaction between neuroticism and pressure condition. Neuroticism negatively predicted performance under social pressure, but did not affect decision-making under low pressure. Additionally, the negative effect of neuroticism under pressure was replicated using a combined social and time pressure manipulation in Experiment 2. These results support distraction theory whereby pressure taxes highly neurotic individuals' cognitive resources, leading to sub-optimal performance. Agreeableness also negatively predicted performance in both experiments.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验大五人格因素是否能够预测在决策过程中哪些人在压力下表现出色,哪些人会发挥失常。使用大五人格量表和一项动态决策任务,要求参与者学习最优策略,以此检验大五人格因素对社交压力下(实验1)以及社交和时间压力综合作用下(实验2)的决策能力和表现的影响。在实验1中,分层多元回归分析显示神经质与压力状况之间存在交互作用。神经质对社交压力下的表现有负面预测作用,但对低压下的决策没有影响。此外,在实验2中,通过综合社交和时间压力操作,重复验证了神经质在压力下的负面影响。这些结果支持了分心理论,即压力消耗了高度神经质个体的认知资源,导致表现欠佳。宜人性在两个实验中也对表现有负面预测作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f1e/5376094/20c80396bbe8/nihms-784834-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Personality profile of amateur team handball referees.业余男子手球裁判的性格特征。
Ger J Exerc Sport Res. 2022 Jul 14:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12662-022-00837-8.
3
Who excels in online learning in Japan?在日本,谁在在线学习方面表现出色?
Front Psychol. 2025 May 5;16:1420996. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1420996. eCollection 2025.
9
Individual predictors of tactical planning performance in junior military officers.初级军官战术规划表现的个体预测因素。
Mil Psychol. 2019 Dec 3;32(2):149-163. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1691405. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
Working-memory load and temporal myopia in dynamic decision making.工作记忆负荷与动态决策中的时间近视。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1640-58. doi: 10.1037/a0028146. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
3
With age comes wisdom: decision making in younger and older adults.年龄带来智慧:年轻人和老年人的决策制定。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1375-80. doi: 10.1177/0956797611420301. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
7
Choking and excelling under pressure.在压力下窒息与卓越并存。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Nov;17(11):944-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01809.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验