Byrne Kaileigh A, Silasi-Mansat Crina D, Worthy Darrell A
Texas A&M University.
Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Feb;74:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
The purpose of the present study was to examine whether the Big Five personality factors could predict who thrives or chokes under pressure during decision-making. The effects of the Big Five personality factors on decision-making ability and performance under social (Experiment 1) and combined social and time pressure (Experiment 2) were examined using the Big Five Personality Inventory and a dynamic decision-making task that required participants to learn an optimal strategy. In Experiment 1, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed an interaction between neuroticism and pressure condition. Neuroticism negatively predicted performance under social pressure, but did not affect decision-making under low pressure. Additionally, the negative effect of neuroticism under pressure was replicated using a combined social and time pressure manipulation in Experiment 2. These results support distraction theory whereby pressure taxes highly neurotic individuals' cognitive resources, leading to sub-optimal performance. Agreeableness also negatively predicted performance in both experiments.
本研究的目的是检验大五人格因素是否能够预测在决策过程中哪些人在压力下表现出色,哪些人会发挥失常。使用大五人格量表和一项动态决策任务,要求参与者学习最优策略,以此检验大五人格因素对社交压力下(实验1)以及社交和时间压力综合作用下(实验2)的决策能力和表现的影响。在实验1中,分层多元回归分析显示神经质与压力状况之间存在交互作用。神经质对社交压力下的表现有负面预测作用,但对低压下的决策没有影响。此外,在实验2中,通过综合社交和时间压力操作,重复验证了神经质在压力下的负面影响。这些结果支持了分心理论,即压力消耗了高度神经质个体的认知资源,导致表现欠佳。宜人性在两个实验中也对表现有负面预测作用。