• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫苗的优化分配

The optimal allocation of Covid-19 vaccines.

作者信息

Babus Ana, Das Sanmay, Lee SangMok

机构信息

Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis, United States of America.

Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, United States of America.

出版信息

Econ Lett. 2023 Mar;224:111008. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111008. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111008
PMID:36741504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9886398/
Abstract

We develop a simple model of vaccine prioritization for a potential pandemic. We illustrate how the model applies to the case of Covid-19, using an early 2020 primitive estimate of occupation-based exposure risks and age-based infection fatality rates. Even based on primitive estimates the vaccine distribution strongly emphasizes age-based mortality risk rather than occupation-based exposure risk. Among others, our result suggests that 50-year-old food-processing workers and 60-year-old financial advisors should have been equally prioritized. We also find that the priorities minimally change when certain populations' exposure risks are altered by targeted stay-at-home orders or call-up of essential workers.

摘要

我们针对潜在的大流行情况开发了一个简单的疫苗优先排序模型。我们举例说明了该模型如何应用于新冠疫情的情况,使用了2020年初基于职业的暴露风险和基于年龄的感染死亡率的初步估计。即使基于初步估计,疫苗分配也强烈强调基于年龄的死亡风险而非基于职业的暴露风险。其中,我们的结果表明,50岁的食品加工工人和60岁的金融顾问应被同等优先考虑。我们还发现,当某些人群的暴露风险因针对性的居家令或关键岗位工作人员的征召而改变时,优先顺序的变化极小。

相似文献

1
The optimal allocation of Covid-19 vaccines.新冠疫苗的优化分配
Econ Lett. 2023 Mar;224:111008. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111008. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
3
Dynamic prioritization of COVID-19 vaccines when social distancing is limited for essential workers.在社交距离对基本工人有限时,对 COVID-19 疫苗进行动态优先级排序。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025786118.
4
Considerations for fair prioritization of COVID-19 vaccine and its mandate among healthcare personnel.医疗保健人员 COVID-19 疫苗公平优先排序及其授权的考虑因素。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jun;37(6):907-909. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1908245. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
5
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
6
Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers.当基本工作者的社交距离限制有限时,对2019冠状病毒病疫苗进行动态优先排序。
medRxiv. 2020 Dec 17:2020.09.22.20199174. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.22.20199174.
7
Did prioritizing essential workers help to achieve racial/ethnic equity in early COVID-19 vaccine distribution? The LA pandemic surveillance cohort study.优先考虑基本工人是否有助于在 COVID-19 疫苗早期分发中实现种族/族裔公平?洛杉矶大流行监测队列研究。
Am J Ind Med. 2022 Apr;65(4):231-241. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23335. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
8
Evaluation of the United States COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy.评估美国 COVID-19 疫苗分配策略。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 17;16(11):e0259700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259700. eCollection 2021.
9
COVID-19 Vaccine Allocation: Modeling Health Outcomes and Equity Implications of Alternative Strategies.2019冠状病毒病疫苗分配:模拟替代策略的健康结果和公平影响
Engineering (Beijing). 2021 Jul;7(7):924-935. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 May 3.
10
Cultivating community-based participatory research (CBPR) to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic: an illustrative example of partnership and topic prioritization in the food services industry.培育以社区为基础的参与式研究(CBPR)以应对 COVID-19 大流行:食品服务行业伙伴关系和主题优先化的实例说明。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):1939. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16787-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A network-based model to assess vaccination strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic by using Bayesian optimization.一种基于网络的模型,用于通过贝叶斯优化评估针对新冠疫情的疫苗接种策略。
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2024 Apr;181. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114695. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Vaccination strategies for different contact patterns: weighing epidemiological against economic outcomes.针对不同接触模式的疫苗接种策略:权衡流行病学结果与经济结果。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar;25(1):131-157. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09384-1. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.

本文引用的文献

1
Vaccine rollout strategies: The case for vaccinating essential workers early.疫苗接种策略:尽早为关键岗位工作人员接种疫苗的理由。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;1(10):e0000020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000020. eCollection 2021.
2
Which workers bear the burden of social distancing?哪些劳动者承担着社交距离的负担?
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):509-526. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09487-6. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
Vaccine optimization for COVID-19: Who to vaccinate first?2019冠状病毒病疫苗优化:优先接种对象为谁?
从新冠疫情中学习:数学疫苗优先排序模型的系统综述
Infect Dis Model. 2024 May 15;9(4):1057-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.05.005. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Vaccination for communicable endemic diseases: optimal allocation of initial and booster vaccine doses.传染病疫苗接种:初始和加强疫苗剂量的最佳分配。
J Math Biol. 2024 Jun 26;89(2):21. doi: 10.1007/s00285-024-02111-x.
5
Parity of esteem: A global COVID-19 vaccination approach for people with mental illnesses, based on facts from 34 countries; recommendations and solutions.同等重视:基于34个国家的事实,为精神疾病患者制定的全球新冠疫苗接种方法;建议与解决方案
Ind Psychiatry J. 2024 Jan-Jun;33(1):30-40. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_54_22. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
6
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.从新冠疫情中学习:数学疫苗优先级模型的系统综述
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 7:2024.03.04.24303726. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303726.
7
Predictive models for health outcomes due to SARS-CoV-2, including the effect of vaccination: a systematic review.预测 SARS-CoV-2 导致的健康结果的模型,包括疫苗接种的效果:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02411-1.
8
Vaccine rollout strategies: The case for vaccinating essential workers early.疫苗接种策略:尽早为关键岗位工作人员接种疫苗的理由。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;1(10):e0000020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000020. eCollection 2021.
9
Impacts of Vaccination on International Trade During the Pandemic Era.大流行时代疫苗接种对国际贸易的影响。
Dev Econ. 2022 Dec;60(4):206-227. doi: 10.1111/deve.12332. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
10
Ethical allocation of scarce vaccine doses: The Priority-Equality protocol.稀缺疫苗剂量的伦理分配:优先平等方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;10:986776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.986776. eCollection 2022.
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 3;7(6). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1374. Print 2020 Feb.
4
Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus.基于模型的 COVID-19 疫苗优先接种策略,按年龄和血清学状态分层。
Science. 2021 Feb 26;371(6532):916-921. doi: 10.1126/science.abe6959. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation.全球疫苗分配的伦理框架。
Science. 2020 Sep 11;369(6509):1309-1312. doi: 10.1126/science.abe2803. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
6
How many jobs can be done at home?有多少工作可以在家完成?
J Public Econ. 2020 Sep;189:104235. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Anthony Fauci, MD, on COVID-19 Vaccines, Schools, and Larry Kramer.医学博士安东尼·福奇谈新冠疫苗、学校及拉里·克莱默。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):220-222. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9222.
8
Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France.估算法国 SARS-CoV-2 的负担。
Science. 2020 Jul 10;369(6500):208-211. doi: 10.1126/science.abc3517. Epub 2020 May 13.