Vermeulen Nicolas, Guyomarch Morgane, Jidovtseff Boris, Oleffe Amandine, Labat Aline, Paul Elisabeth
Université catholique de Louvain, Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Fund for Scientific Research, Brussels, Belgium.
IJID Reg. 2023 Mar;6:146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
Belgium enacted a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pass - the 'COVID Safe Ticket' (CST) - in October 2021. This study aimed to understand the expectations and reasons given by those supporting this policy measure.
This mixed methods study was based on a voluntary online survey among 9444 French-speaking residents in Belgium.
Most respondents were not very supportive of the CST, with only 617 respondents (7%) being pro-CST. Compared with other respondents, the pro-CST sample comprised more males, older people, people scared of COVID-19, people who had confidence in the COVID-19 vaccines, and highly educated people. A qualitative analysis was undertaken to identify the reasons why respondents supported the CST. Two lines of argument were related to personal comfort (individual protection and means of 'recovering freedom'), and two other lines were related to collective protection (controlling the pandemic and incentivizing vaccination). Pro-CST respondents also indicated some limitations of the CST.
The expectations regarding the CST were high, diverse and not entirely rational. Some contradictions and frustration emerged from the respondents' comments. The CST may have exacerbated the social divide in society. The high expectations risk leading to comparably high levels of disappointment, resulting in potential distrust towards future public health interventions.
比利时于2021年10月颁布了一项2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)通行证——“COVID安全通行证”(CST)。本研究旨在了解支持这一政策措施的人群的期望和理由。
这项混合方法研究基于对比利时9444名说法语居民的自愿在线调查。
大多数受访者不太支持CST,只有617名受访者(7%)支持CST。与其他受访者相比,支持CST的样本中男性更多、年龄更大、害怕COVID-19的人更多、对COVID-19疫苗有信心的人更多以及受教育程度高的人更多。进行了定性分析以确定受访者支持CST的原因。两条论据与个人舒适度有关(个人防护和“恢复自由”的方式),另外两条与集体防护有关(控制疫情和激励接种疫苗)。支持CST的受访者也指出了CST的一些局限性。
对CST的期望很高、多种多样且并不完全合理。受访者的评论中出现了一些矛盾和挫折感。CST可能加剧了社会中的社会分化。高期望可能导致同样高程度的失望,从而导致对未来公共卫生干预措施的潜在不信任。