• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program.人工智能乳腺超声与手持式超声在乳腺病变 BI-RADS 分类中的比较:一项在筛查项目中的头对头初步比较研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;10:1098639. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of artificial intelligent breast ultrasound on lesion detection and characterization compared with hand-held ultrasound in asymptomatic women.在无症状女性中,将人工智能乳腺超声与手持超声在病变检测和特征描述方面进行比较的评估。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 15;13:1207260. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1207260. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.三维自动化乳腺超声与手持乳腺超声在致密乳腺病变检测和 BI-RADS 特征描述方面的比较:592 例研究。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Aug;29(8):1143-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.11.022. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.自动乳腺超声:病变检测与BI-RADS分类——一项初步研究。
Rofo. 2008 Sep;180(9):804-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027563. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
5
Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies?人工智能在 BI-RADS 超声乳腺病变分类中的应用:我们能否减少过度随访和活检?
Acad Radiol. 2024 Jun;31(6):2194-2202. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.11.031. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
6
7
The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.3D ABUS 与 HHUS 对 1886 例女性大样本乳腺病灶的可视化及 BI-RADS 特征评估的性能比较。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):592-601. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5011-9. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
8
Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.根据第五版 BI-RADS 对乳腺超声的评估与手持超声相比,自动乳腺容积扫描仪的评估。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Feb;99:138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术后的超声筛查中自动乳腺超声与手持超声的比较。
Tumori. 2021 Apr;107(2):132-138. doi: 10.1177/0300891620930278. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
10
Diagnostic Performance of Prototype Handheld Ultrasound According to the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound Compared with Automated Breast Ultrasound among Females with Positive Lumps.根据乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)第五版乳腺超声标准,对有阳性肿块的女性进行原型手持式超声与自动乳腺超声的诊断性能比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;13(6):1065. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061065.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of a predictive model for postoperative recurrence and metastasis in breast cancer using an artificial intelligence ultrasound breast system.使用人工智能乳腺超声系统开发和评估乳腺癌术后复发和转移的预测模型
Am J Transl Res. 2025 May 15;17(5):4038-4053. doi: 10.62347/MECC4748. eCollection 2025.
2
Epidemiological Characterisation of Chronic Diseases Among Civil Servants in Hebei Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Real-World Study of Approximately 50,000 Adults.中国河北省公务员慢性病的流行病学特征:一项对约5万名成年人的横断面真实世界研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 May 17;17:1301-1313. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S457345. eCollection 2024.
3
Inter-System Variability of Eight Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices-A Prospective Comparison of B-Scan Quality and Clinical Significance in Intensive Care.八种不同手持式超声(HHUS)设备的系统间变异性——重症监护中B超扫描质量及临床意义的前瞻性比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 26;14(1):54. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010054.
4
Prospective Comparison of Handheld Ultrasound Devices from Different Manufacturers with Respect to B-Scan Quality and Clinical Significance for Various Abdominal Sonography Questions.不同制造商的手持式超声设备在B超扫描质量及对各种腹部超声检查问题的临床意义方面的前瞻性比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;13(24):3622. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13243622.
5
Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology.开启5D超声时代?关于人工智能超声成像在妇产科应用的系统文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 29;12(21):6833. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216833.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.致密型乳腺女性补充性乳腺癌筛查超声检查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2020 Aug;123(4):673-688. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0928-1. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声筛查乳腺癌的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06992-1.
4
Automatic Breast Volume Scanner versus Handheld Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.自动乳腺容积扫描仪与手持超声在鉴别良恶性乳腺病变中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Aug;45(8):1874-1881. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.04.028. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses.可疑乳腺肿块的自动与手持式乳腺超声检查的可靠性
Ultrasonography. 2019 Jul;38(3):264-271. doi: 10.14366/usg.18055. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
6
Artificial intelligence in breast ultrasound.乳腺超声中的人工智能
World J Radiol. 2019 Feb 28;11(2):19-26. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v11.i2.19.
7
Cancer deaths and cases attributable to lifestyle factors and infections in China, 2013.中国 2013 年因生活方式因素和感染导致的癌症死亡和发病。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2567-2574. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx342.
8
Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention.乳腺癌筛查与预防。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jun 7;164(11):ITC81-ITC96. doi: 10.7326/AITC201606070.
9
Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.超声作为乳腺癌的主要筛查手段:来自ACRIN 6666研究的分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 28;108(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv367. Print 2016 Apr.
10
Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization.自动超声乳腺诊断:病灶检测和特征描述的观察者间一致性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):747-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5841.

人工智能乳腺超声与手持式超声在乳腺病变 BI-RADS 分类中的比较:一项在筛查项目中的头对头初步比较研究。

Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in the BI-RADS categorization of breast lesions: A pilot head to head comparison study in screening program.

机构信息

Department of Breast, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Department of Surgery, Changting Maternity and Children's Hospital, Longyan, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;10:1098639. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098639
PMID:36743185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9889643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence breast ultrasound diagnostic system (AIBUS) has been introduced as an alternative approach for handheld ultrasound (HHUS), while their results in BI-RADS categorization has not been compared.

METHODS

This pilot study was based on a screening program conducted from May 2020 to October 2020 in southeast China. All the participants who received both HHUS and AIBUS were included in the study ( = 344). The ultrasound videos after AIBUS scanning were independently watched by a senior radiologist and a junior radiologist. Agreement rate and weighted Kappa value were used to compare their results in BI-RADS categorization with HHUS.

RESULTS

The detection rate of breast nodules by HHUS was 14.83%, while the detection rates were 34.01% for AIBUS videos watched by a senior radiologist and 35.76% when watched by a junior radiologist. After AIBUS scanning, the weighted Kappa value for BI-RADS categorization between videos watched by senior radiologists and HHUS was 0.497 ( < 0.001) with an agreement rate of 78.8%, indicating its potential use in breast cancer screening. However, the Kappa value of AIBUS videos watched by junior radiologist was 0.39, when comparing to HHUS.

CONCLUSION

AIBUS breast scan can obtain relatively clear images and detect more breast nodules. The results of AIBUS scanning watched by senior radiologists are moderately consistent with HHUS and might be used in screening practice, especially in primary health care with limited numbers of radiologists.

摘要

背景

人工智能乳腺超声诊断系统(AIBUS)已作为手持超声(HHUS)的替代方法引入,但其在 BI-RADS 分类中的结果尚未进行比较。

方法

本研究为 2020 年 5 月至 2020 年 10 月在中国东南部进行的筛查项目的基础上进行的。所有接受 HHUS 和 AIBUS 检查的参与者均纳入本研究(n=344)。AIBUS 扫描后,由一名资深放射科医生和一名初级放射科医生独立观看超声视频。使用一致性率和加权 Kappa 值来比较他们在 BI-RADS 分类中的结果与 HHUS 的结果。

结果

HHUS 检测到的乳腺结节检出率为 14.83%,而由资深放射科医生观看的 AIBUS 视频的检出率为 34.01%,由初级放射科医生观看的检出率为 35.76%。AIBUS 扫描后,资深放射科医生观看的视频与 HHUS 的 BI-RADS 分类之间的加权 Kappa 值为 0.497(<0.001),一致性率为 78.8%,表明其在乳腺癌筛查中具有潜在的应用价值。然而,与 HHUS 相比,由初级放射科医生观看的 AIBUS 视频的 Kappa 值为 0.39。

结论

AIBUS 乳腺扫描可以获得相对清晰的图像并检测到更多的乳腺结节。由资深放射科医生观看的 AIBUS 扫描结果与 HHUS 中度一致,可能在筛查实践中使用,特别是在放射科医生人数有限的初级保健中。