Qiu Hongquan, Zhang Liang, Wang Dongzhi, Miao Haiyan, Zhang Yu
Department of Surgery, Liuqiao Central Hospital, Nantong, China.
Department of General Surgery, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China.
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 20;13:1072229. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1072229. eCollection 2022.
The efficacy of pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic tumors is controversial. The study aims to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in the treatment of pancreatic tumors through systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of science databases were searched for clinical studies on the treatment of pancreatic tumors with LPD and OPD. The end time for the searches was 20 July 2022. Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen the articles, the Cochrane manual was used to evaluate the quality of the included articles, and the stata15.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the indicators. In total, 16 articles were included, including two randomized controlled trials and 14 retrospective studies. Involving a total of 4416 patients, 1275 patients were included in the LPD group and 3141 patients in the OPD group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: the operation time of LPD was longer than that of OPD [WMD = 56.14,95% CI (38.39,73.89), = 0.001]; the amount of intraoperative blood loss of LPD was less than that of OPD [WMD = -120.82,95% CI (-169.33, -72.30), = 0.001]. No significant difference was observed between LPD and OPD regarding hospitalization time [WMD = -0.5,95% CI (-1.35, 0.35), = 0.250]. No significant difference was observed regarding postoperative complications [RR = 0.96,95% CI (0.86,1.07, = 0.463]. And there was no significant difference regarding 1-year OS and 3-year OS: 1-year OS [RR = 1.02,95% CI (0.97,1.08), = 0.417], 3-year OS [RR = 1.10 95% CI (0.75, 1.62), = 0.614%]. In comparison with OPD, LPD leads to less blood loss but longer operation time, therefore the bleeding rate per unit time of LPD is less than that of OPD. LPD has obvious advantages. With the increase of clinical application of LPD, the usage of LPD in patients with pancreatic cancer has very good prospect. Due to the limitations of this paper, in future studies, more attention should be paid to high-quality, multi-center, randomized controlled studies.
胰十二指肠切除术与开放胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺肿瘤的疗效存在争议。本研究旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析比较腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)与开放胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)治疗胰腺肿瘤的疗效。检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of science数据库中关于LPD和OPD治疗胰腺肿瘤的临床研究。检索截止时间为2022年7月20日。采用严格的纳入和排除标准筛选文章,使用Cochrane手册评估纳入文章的质量,并使用stata15.0软件对指标进行统计分析。共纳入16篇文章,包括2篇随机对照试验和14篇回顾性研究。共涉及4416例患者,LPD组纳入1275例患者,OPD组纳入3141例患者。荟萃分析结果显示:LPD的手术时间长于OPD [加权均数差(WMD)=56.14,95%可信区间(CI)(38.39,73.89),P = 0.001];LPD的术中失血量少于OPD [WMD = -120.82,95%CI(-169.33,-72.30),P = 0.001]。LPD和OPD在住院时间方面未观察到显著差异[WMD = -0.5,95%CI(-1.35,0.35),P = 0.250]。在术后并发症方面未观察到显著差异[相对危险度(RR)=0.96,95%CI(0.86,1.07),P = 0.463]。在1年总生存率和3年总生存率方面也没有显著差异:1年总生存率[RR = 1.02,95%CI(0.97,1.08),P = 0.417],3年总生存率[RR = 1.10,95%CI(0.75,1.62),P = 0.614%]。与OPD相比,LPD导致的失血量更少,但手术时间更长,因此LPD单位时间的出血率低于OPD。LPD具有明显优势。随着LPD临床应用的增加,LPD在胰腺癌患者中的应用前景非常好。由于本文的局限性,在未来的研究中,应更加关注高质量、多中心、随机对照研究。