Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Feb 6;32(2):159-163. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1041.
In 2017, cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands switched from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing using the validated PCR-based cobas 4800. Women could order and subsequently received a free self-sampling kit (Evalyn Brush) at their home address instead of clinician sampling. In the laboratory, the shipped brush was placed into 20 mL of PreservCyt fluid, before testing. In the first 2 years of the new program, only 7% of screening tests were performed on a self-sample. Those who chose self-sampling versus clinician sampling were more likely to have never been screened previously and differed also with respect to sociodemographic factors. Subsequent more active promotion and increasing the ease to obtain kits increased the proportion opting for self-sampling (16% in 2020). HPV positivity and detection rate of precancer (CIN3+) were lower in the self-sampling compared with the clinician-sampling group (adjusted ORs of 0.65 and 0.86, respectively). Although population differences may partially explain these results, self-samples may have been too dilute, thereby reducing the analytic and clinical sensitivity. The Dutch findings demonstrate the importance of optimizing outreach, specimen handling and testing protocols for self-samples to effectively screen the target population and reach in particular the women at highest risk for cervical cancer. See related article by Aitken et al., p. 183.
2017 年,荷兰将宫颈癌筛查方法从细胞学检查改为基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的 cobas 4800 人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测。女性可以在自己的住址订购并随后收到免费的自我采样套件(Evalyn Brush),而不是由临床医生采样。在实验室中,将寄出的刷子放入 20 毫升 PreservCyt 液中,然后进行检测。在新计划的头 2 年,只有 7%的筛查测试是在自我样本上进行的。选择自我采样而非临床医生采样的人以前更不可能接受过筛查,而且在社会人口统计学因素方面也存在差异。随后更积极的推广和增加获取套件的便利性,增加了选择自我采样的比例(2020 年为 16%)。与临床医生采样组相比,自我采样组的 HPV 阳性率和癌前病变(CIN3+)检出率较低(调整后的比值比分别为 0.65 和 0.86)。尽管人群差异可能部分解释了这些结果,但自我样本可能过于稀释,从而降低了分析和临床敏感性。荷兰的研究结果表明,优化外展、标本处理和自我样本检测方案对于有效筛查目标人群、特别是那些宫颈癌风险最高的女性非常重要。请参阅 Aitken 等人的相关文章,第 183 页。