Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Interprof Care. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):294-307. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2170994. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Interprofessional education facilitates collaborative practice, which promotes high-quality patient care and patient safety. Interprofessional education (IPE) experiences within clinical settings provide an opportunity for the development of interprofessional collaborative practice competence. The aim of this systematic review was to review the literature evaluating interprofessional education for health professional students within clinical settings and summarize the behavioral outcomes. Databases searched were PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Taylor & Francis Online, ERIC and PsycINFO. Full-text articles were independently screened by two reviewers and included if agreed. Outcomes were analyzed using Kirkpatrick's model modified for IPE. Studies with behavioral change outcomes were analyzed and synthesized using narrative methods. Included studies provided evidence that IPE experiences in clinical settings can enable students to develop and integrate interprofessional collaborative practice competencies, across diverse types of settings. Key tasks enabling students to achieve these learning outcomes included synchronous patient consultations, collaborative development of integrative health-care plans outside of patient consultations, and participation in socialization with health-care teams. There were limitations in the methodological design of the included studies, with limited use of comparator groups and validated tools, high usage of self-report data and serious risk of bias identified across all quantitative included studies. In conclusion, high-quality research designed to measure the construct of behavioral change is lacking. Such research could further investigate the key tasks in IPE experiences in clinical settings that are necessary for students to develop the range of required collaborative practice competencies and integrate these. This could provide clarification regarding if and how this could be achieved across different types of clinical placements.
跨专业教育促进了协作实践,从而提高了患者护理质量和安全性。临床环境中的跨专业教育(IPE)经验为发展跨专业协作实践能力提供了机会。本系统评价的目的是回顾评估临床环境中卫生专业学生跨专业教育的文献,并总结行为结果。搜索的数据库包括 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Taylor & Francis Online、ERIC 和 PsycINFO。两位评审员独立筛选全文文章,如果达成一致则纳入。使用为 IPE 定制的柯克帕特里克模型分析结果。使用叙述方法分析和综合具有行为改变结果的研究。纳入的研究提供了证据表明,临床环境中的 IPE 经验可以使学生发展和整合跨专业协作实践能力,涵盖各种类型的环境。使学生能够实现这些学习成果的关键任务包括同步患者咨询、在患者咨询之外共同制定综合医疗保健计划以及参与与医疗团队的社会化。纳入研究的方法设计存在局限性,包括对对照组和经过验证的工具的使用有限、自我报告数据的高使用率以及所有纳入的定量研究中存在严重的偏倚风险。总之,缺乏旨在衡量行为改变结构的高质量研究。此类研究可以进一步调查临床环境中 IPE 经验中的关键任务,这些任务对于学生发展所需的一系列协作实践能力并整合这些能力是必要的。这可以澄清在不同类型的临床实习中是否以及如何实现这一目标。