Suppr超能文献

核心微生物组分配比较分析:对生态综合的启示。

Comparative Analysis of Core Microbiome Assignments: Implications for Ecological Synthesis.

机构信息

Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.

Department of Plant Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

mSystems. 2023 Feb 23;8(1):e0106622. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01066-22. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

Abstract

The concept of a core microbiome has been broadly used to refer to the consistent presence of a set of taxa across multiple samples within a given habitat. The assignment of taxa to core microbiomes can be performed by several methods based on the abundance and occupancy (i.e., detection across samples) of individual taxa. These approaches have led to methodological inconsistencies, with direct implications for ecological interpretation. Here, we reviewed a set of methods most commonly used to infer core microbiomes in divergent systems. We applied these methods using large data sets and analyzed simulations to determine their accuracy in core microbiome assignments. Our results show that core taxa assignments vary significantly across methods and data set types, with occupancy-based methods most accurately defining true core membership. We also found the ability of these methods to accurately capture core assignments to be contingent on the distribution of taxon abundance and occupancy in the data set. Finally, we provide specific recommendations for further studies using core taxa assignments and discuss the need for unifying methodical approaches toward data processing to advance ecological synthesis. Different methods are commonly used to assign core microbiome membership, leading to methodological inconsistencies across studies. In this study, we review a set of the most commonly used core microbiome assignment methods and compare their core assignments using both simulated and empirical data. We report inconsistent classifications from commonly applied core microbiome assignment methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate the implication that variable core assignments may have on downstream ecological interpretations. Although we still lack a standardized approach to core taxa assignments, our study provides a direction to properly test core assignment methods and offers advances in model parameterization and method choice across distinct data types.

摘要

核心微生物组的概念被广泛用于指在给定栖息地的多个样本中一致存在的一组分类群。将分类群分配到核心微生物组可以通过几种基于个体分类群丰度和占有率(即跨样本检测)的方法来完成。这些方法导致了方法上的不一致,对生态解释有直接影响。在这里,我们回顾了一组最常用于推断不同系统中核心微生物组的方法。我们使用大型数据集应用这些方法,并进行模拟分析以确定它们在核心微生物组分配中的准确性。我们的结果表明,核心分类群的分配在方法和数据集类型之间存在显著差异,基于占有率的方法最能准确定义真正的核心成员。我们还发现,这些方法准确捕获核心分配的能力取决于数据集中文体丰度和占有率的分布。最后,我们提供了使用核心分类群分配的进一步研究的具体建议,并讨论了统一数据处理方法以推进生态综合的必要性。不同的方法常用于分配核心微生物组的成员,导致研究之间存在方法上的不一致。在这项研究中,我们回顾了一组最常用的核心微生物组分配方法,并使用模拟和经验数据比较它们的核心分配。我们报告了来自常用核心微生物组分配方法的不一致分类。此外,我们证明了可变核心分配可能对下游生态解释产生影响。尽管我们仍然缺乏标准化的核心分类群分配方法,但我们的研究为正确测试核心分配方法提供了方向,并在不同数据类型的模型参数化和方法选择方面提供了进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4f4/9948721/d5cce9953596/msystems.01066-22-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验