Salm Daiana C, Horewicz Verônica V, Tanaka Fernanda, Ferreira Júlia K, de Oliveira Bruna H, Maio Julia Maria Batista, Donatello Nathalia N, Ludtke Daniela D, Mazzardo-Martins Leidiane, Dutra Aline R, Mack Josiel M, de C H Kunzler Deborah, Cargnin-Ferreira Eduardo, Salgado Afonso S I, Bittencourt Edsel B, Bianco Gianluca, Piovezan Anna Paula, Bobinski Franciane, Moré Ari O O, Martins Daniel F
Experimental Neuroscience Laboratory (LaNEx), University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, University of South Santa Catarina, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Mol Neurobiol. 2023 May;60(5):2889-2909. doi: 10.1007/s12035-023-03237-7. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
This study evaluated the antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of percutaneous vagus nerve electrical stimulation (pVNS) by comparing the effects of alternating and random frequencies in an animal model of persistent inflammatory hyperalgesia. The model was induced by Freund's complete adjuvant (CFA) intraplantar (i.pl.) injection. Mice were treated with different protocols of time (10, 20, or 30 min), ear laterality (right, left or both), and frequency (alternating or random). Mechanical hyperalgesia was evaluated, and some groups received i.pl. WRW4 (FPR2/ALX antagonist) to determine the involvement. Edema, paw surface temperature, and spontaneous locomotor activity were evaluated. Interleukin-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and IL4 levels were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. AnxA1, FPR2/ALX, neutrophil, M1 and M2 phenotype macrophage, and apoptotic cells markers were identified using western blotting. The antihyperalgesic effect pVNS with alternating and random frequency effect is depending on the type of frequency, time, and ear treated. The pVNS random frequency in the left ear for 10 min had a longer lasting antihyperalgesic effect, superior to classical stimulation using alternating frequency and the FPR2/ALX receptor was involved in this effect. There was a reduction in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and an increase in the immunocontent of AnxA1 and CD86 in mice paw. pVNS with a random frequency in the left ear for 10 min showed to be optimal for inducing an antihyperalgesic effect. Thus, the random frequency was more effective than the alternating frequency. Therefore, pVNS may be an important adjunctive treatment for persistent inflammatory pain.
本研究通过比较交替频率和随机频率在持续性炎性痛觉过敏动物模型中的作用,评估经皮迷走神经电刺激(pVNS)的抗痛觉过敏和抗炎作用。该模型通过足底注射弗氏完全佐剂(CFA)诱导产生。对小鼠采用不同的时间(10、20或30分钟)、耳部位置(右耳、左耳或双耳)和频率(交替或随机)方案进行治疗。评估机械性痛觉过敏情况,部分组接受足底注射WRW4(FPR2/ALX拮抗剂)以确定其参与情况。评估水肿、爪表面温度和自发运动活动。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法验证白细胞介素-1β、IL-6、IL-10和IL4水平。使用蛋白质印迹法鉴定膜联蛋白A1、FPR2/ALX、中性粒细胞、M1和M2表型巨噬细胞以及凋亡细胞标志物。交替频率和随机频率的pVNS的抗痛觉过敏作用取决于频率类型、时间和治疗的耳部。左耳随机频率的pVNS持续10分钟具有更持久的抗痛觉过敏作用,优于使用交替频率的经典刺激,且FPR2/ALX受体参与此作用。小鼠爪中促炎细胞因子水平降低,膜联蛋白A1和CD86的免疫含量增加。左耳随机频率的pVNS持续10分钟显示出诱导抗痛觉过敏作用的最佳效果。因此,随机频率比交替频率更有效。所以,pVNS可能是持续性炎性疼痛的一种重要辅助治疗方法。