• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康与成瘾领域知识管理系统的实施:混合方法案例研究

Implementation of a Knowledge Management System in Mental Health and Addictions: Mixed Methods Case Study.

作者信息

Chorney Jill, Johnson Emberly Debbie, Jeffrey Jennifer, Hundert Amos, Pakkanlilar Onur, Abidi Sabina, Bagnell Alexa, Brennan Maureen, Campbell Leslie Anne, Clark Sharon, Bradley Kristina, Ross Olivia

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Mental Health and Addictions Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 6;7:e39334. doi: 10.2196/39334.

DOI:10.2196/39334
PMID:36745489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9941906/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mental health and addictions (MHA) care is complex and individualized and requires coordination across providers and areas of care. Knowledge management is an essential facilitator and common challenge in MHA services.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aimed to describe the development of a knowledge management system (KMS) and the associated processes in 1 MHA program. We also aimed to examine the uptake and use, satisfaction, and feedback on implementation among a group of pilot testers.

METHODS

This project was conducted as a continuous quality-improvement initiative. Integrated stakeholder engagement was used to scope the content and design the information architecture to be implemented using a commercially available knowledge management platform. A group of 30 clinical and administrative staff were trained and tested with the KMS over a period of 10 weeks. Feedback was collected via surveys and focus groups. System analytics were used to characterize engagement. The content, design, and full-scale implementation planning of the KMS were refined based on the results.

RESULTS

Satisfaction with accessing the content increased from baseline to after the pilot. Most testers indicated that they would recommend the KMS to a colleague, and satisfaction with KMS functionalities was high. A median of 7 testers was active each week, and testers were active for a median of 4 days over the course of the pilot. Focus group themes included the following: the KMS was a solution to problems for staff members, functionality of the KMS was important, quality content matters, training was helpful and could be improved, and KMS access was required to be easy and barrier free.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge management is an ongoing need in MHA services, and KMSs hold promise in addressing this need. Testers in 1 MHA program found a KMS that is easy to use and would recommend it to colleagues. Opportunities to improve implementation and increase uptake were identified. Future research is needed to understand the impact of KMSs on quality of care and organizational efficiency.

摘要

背景

心理健康与成瘾(MHA)护理复杂且具个性化,需要各提供者及护理领域间的协调。知识管理是MHA服务中的关键促进因素及常见挑战。

目的

本文旨在描述一个知识管理系统(KMS)在一个MHA项目中的开发及相关流程。我们还旨在研究一组试点测试者对该系统的采用与使用情况、满意度及对实施的反馈。

方法

本项目作为一项持续质量改进举措开展。通过整合利益相关者参与来确定内容范围,并设计将使用市售知识管理平台实施的信息架构。一组30名临床和行政人员在10周内接受了KMS培训并进行测试。通过调查和焦点小组收集反馈。使用系统分析来描述参与情况。根据结果对KMS的内容、设计和全面实施计划进行完善。

结果

从基线到试点结束后,对内容获取的满意度有所提高。大多数测试者表示会向同事推荐KMS,对KMS功能的满意度较高。每周活跃的测试者中位数为7人,在试点过程中,测试者活跃天数的中位数为4天。焦点小组的主题包括:KMS是解决工作人员问题的方案、KMS的功能很重要、高质量的内容很关键、培训有帮助且可改进、KMS访问需要简便且无障碍。

结论

知识管理在MHA服务中是持续需求,KMS有望满足这一需求。一个MHA项目中的测试者发现了一个易于使用的KMS,并会向同事推荐。确定了改进实施和提高采用率的机会。需要未来的研究来了解KMS对护理质量和组织效率的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e841/9941906/c2599d46c902/formative_v7i1e39334_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e841/9941906/eae29b22bfd8/formative_v7i1e39334_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e841/9941906/c2599d46c902/formative_v7i1e39334_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e841/9941906/eae29b22bfd8/formative_v7i1e39334_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e841/9941906/c2599d46c902/formative_v7i1e39334_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of a Knowledge Management System in Mental Health and Addictions: Mixed Methods Case Study.心理健康与成瘾领域知识管理系统的实施:混合方法案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 6;7:e39334. doi: 10.2196/39334.
2
3
Priority Given to Technology in Government-Based Mental Health and Addictions Vision and Strategy Documents: Systematic Policy Review.政府心理健康与成瘾愿景及战略文件中对技术的重视:系统政策审查
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 5;23(5):e25547. doi: 10.2196/25547.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Improving the quality of workers' compensation health care delivery: the Washington State Occupational Health Services Project.提高工伤赔偿医疗服务质量:华盛顿州职业健康服务项目。
Milbank Q. 2001;79(1):5-33. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00194.
6
7
Enabling health care decisionmaking through clinical decision support and knowledge management.通过临床决策支持和知识管理实现医疗保健决策。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Apr(203):1-784.
8
9
10
[A development and evaluation of nursing KMS using QFD in outpatient departments].[运用质量功能展开法开发与评估门诊护理知识管理系统]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014 Feb;44(1):64-74. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2014.44.1.64.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating implementation science in clinical research to maximize public health impact: a call for the reporting and alignment of implementation strategy use with implementation outcomes in clinical research.将实施科学融入临床研究,最大限度地提高公共卫生影响:呼吁在临床研究中报告和调整实施策略的使用与实施结果的一致性。
Implement Sci. 2020 Nov 25;15(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01060-5.
2
Knowledge Management Implementation and the Tools Utilized in Healthcare for Evidence-Based Decision Making: A Systematic Review.知识管理实施与医疗保健中用于循证决策的工具:一项系统综述。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017 Sep;27(5):541-558. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i5.13.
3
Knowledge management systems success in healthcare: Leadership matters.
医疗保健领域知识管理系统的成功:领导力至关重要。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:331-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Key success factors for clinical knowledge management systems: Comparing physician and hospital manager viewpoints.临床知识管理系统的关键成功因素:比较医生和医院管理者的观点。
Technol Health Care. 2015;24 Suppl 1:S297-306. doi: 10.3233/THC-151087.
5
An empirically based model for knowledge management in health care organizations.一种基于实证的医疗保健组织知识管理模型。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Jan-Mar;41(1):64-74. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000046.
6
Lessons from the business sector for successful knowledge management in health care: a systematic review.从商业领域汲取成功经验,助力医疗保健领域的知识管理:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul 25;11:173. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-173.
7
Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals.系统评价影响医疗保健专业人员采用信息和通信技术的因素。
J Med Syst. 2012 Feb;36(1):241-77. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
8
Critical factors for the adoption of mobile nursing information systems in Taiwan: the nursing department administrators' perspective.台湾地区采用移动护理信息系统的关键因素:护理部门管理人员的视角
J Med Syst. 2009 Oct;33(5):369-77. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9199-8.
9
Implementing guidance and guidelines for developing and delivering equitable child and adolescent mental health services.实施关于发展和提供公平的儿童及青少年心理健康服务的指导意见和准则。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;22(4):339-44. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832d905c.
10
Use of a wiki as a radiology departmental knowledge management system.使用维基作为放射科部门知识管理系统。
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):142-51. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9180-1. Epub 2009 Jan 30.